The article went on to say, and I highlighted it in my first post: Both Mitt Romney and Barack Obama profess to be Christians. Both make this claim, but neither are biblical Christians.
“The article went on to say, and I highlighted it in my first post: Both Mitt Romney and Barack Obama profess to be Christians. Both make this claim, but neither are biblical Christians. “
At least it is clear that Romney is a Mormon. Nobody is quite sure what the heck Obama is.
He is more of an equivocator than whatever he professes to be, couching his answers or statements of what he believes himself to be in confusing language.
I know, I saw that. But that’s a statement I disagree with also. Unless one is a Biblical Christian - they aren’t a Christian. The article (not the first) uses the word ‘Christian’ as if it applies to all and it doesn’t. He says he a Christian but later on he explains it. SPEAK the truth at ALL TIME. Write the church he goes to instead of ‘he was baptized and chose Christianity as an adult’. It’s a lie from the pit. People not informed read it and stay uninformed. The writer is deliberately misleading - wonder ‘the type’ of Christian he claims to be. Then he goes on to quoting Scripture as if he is teaching us something. What a farce!
My point is, I haven’t heard Mitt or barry ashamed of where they went to church. I don’t care what romney and obama called themselves, it what this author is calling them! Why is the author being so dishonest - for what reason? To keep the sheeple ignorant or he bowed to PC? I am so out of patience for lies, and had very little to begin with.
Then the title ‘Christians under a non-Christian King’. So he made Obama a King. When does a ‘Christian’ ever teach our president is our King? Got an idea why I’m rebelling at the author of this thread. He can cram his teaching. FWIW, I did not read the whole article. I got to a point and stopped.