Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic bishops bemoan condoms, gays as threats to marriage
Salt Lake Tribune ^ | October 14, 2009 | Daniel Burke

Posted on 10/15/2009 5:26:16 AM PDT by NYer

Washington » Cohabitation, divorce, contraception and same-sex unions are undermining the traditional meaning and purposes of marriage, the nation's Catholic bishops warn in an upcoming statement.

"We are troubled by the fact that far too many people do not understand what it means to say that marriage -- both as a natural institution and a Christian sacrament -- is a blessing and gift from God," the bishops say in a "pastoral letter" to be adopted at next month's U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops meeting in Baltimore.

National Catholic Reporter, an independent weekly newspaper, obtained a draft of the 57-page document, entitled "Marriage: Love and Life in the Divine Plan" and posted the document on its Web site on Monday (Oct. 12).

The bishops are expected to offer amendments to the draft when they gather in Baltimore Nov. 16-19. They will also issue a document on reproductive technologies, revise guidelines on end-of-life care, and hear a preliminary report on the causes and contexts of the clergy sex abuse scandal.

Large portions of the bishops' letter reiterate arguments the church has made for centuries. But it comes as more Americans, including Catholics, are adopting sexual ethics that contradict church teaching. Meanwhile, President Obama last Saturday criticized "outworn arguments and old attitudes" and pledged to fight for gay rights, including same-sex marriage.

Catholics must lean on centuries of church documents and dogma to fight such innovations, particularly gay marriage, the bishops argue in the letter. "The legal recognition of same-sex unions poses a multifaceted threat to the very fabric of society, striking at the very source from which society and culture come..." the letter reads.

Recognizing gay marriage threatens "the intrinsic dignity of every human person, and the common good," the bishops say.

The bishops also condemn cohabitation and contraception as "intrinsically evil" because they separate the unifying and procreative dimensions of sex.

H. Richard McCord, executive director of the bishops' Secretariat of Laity, Marriage, Family Life and Youth, said the letter is part of the bishops' National Pastoral Initiative on Marriage, which began in 2005 and aims to "strengthen marriage as a human institution and as a sacramental reality."

Pastoral letters from the bishops conference are relatively rare, McCord said, noting that they are often directed at "big subjects" such as war and capitalism. "It is a teaching tool in which the bishops attempt to summarize the relevant and foundational points of Catholic teaching on a particular subject and apply it to certain issues of the day," he said.

Already, though, the draft has drawn criticism. In an editorial, National Catholic Reporter said the letter "reads as if it was written by someone who has never once engaged in a marriage preparation program, let alone actually ever been married."


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Current Events; Moral Issues
KEYWORDS: catholic; condoms; homosexual; homosexualagenda; marriage; usccb

1 posted on 10/15/2009 5:26:16 AM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...
In an editorial, National Catholic Reporter said the letter "reads as if it was written by someone who has never once engaged in a marriage preparation program, let alone actually ever been married."

Look at the source ... no surprise at their criticism.

2 posted on 10/15/2009 5:27:26 AM PDT by NYer ( "One Who Prays Is Not Afraid; One Who Prays Is Never Alone"- Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I think the “bemoans” be coming from the WH

And question for SLC- if 2 men is OK, why not 3 men?

Or why not 1 man and 7 women?

Who “makes the rules”, on what is marriage, anyway? Society? Or individuals?


3 posted on 10/15/2009 5:28:46 AM PDT by silverleaf (If we are astroturf, why are the democrats trying to mow us?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Even the title is meant to make the bishops look like lunatics. No one considers gay people themselves a threat to marriage.


4 posted on 10/15/2009 6:19:43 AM PDT by Julia H. (Freedom of speech and freedom from criticism are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Julia H.
No one considers gay people themselves a threat to marriage.

what is your understanding of marriage?

5 posted on 10/15/2009 6:42:11 AM PDT by NYer ( "One Who Prays Is Not Afraid; One Who Prays Is Never Alone"- Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Could it be that gubberment involvement in marriage has cheapened it for the average person? It’s not like social security checks are held sacred either...Also when you rely on the gubberment to define and defend something so important as marriage I’m suprised that anyone would be shocked when it gets all messed up.

Freegards


6 posted on 10/15/2009 7:12:17 AM PDT by Ransomed (Son of Ransomed Says Keep the Faith!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Marriage is the union of one man and one woman, and the foundation of the family structure.

The mere existence of gays doesn’t threaten this. The traditional view of marriage has prevailed for millennia despite the fact that every society in the history of this planet has had homosexual members. When active homosexuals keep their behavior to themselves, accept the full brunt of the consequences, and don’t try to change laws and radically overhaul society’s notion of morality in an attempt to normalize their behavior, the evil is contained and society as we know it remains unharmed.


7 posted on 10/15/2009 7:56:35 AM PDT by Julia H. (Freedom of speech and freedom from criticism are mutually exclusive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYer
"...bemoan..."

knew by the title it was either a legacy rag or a "Vatican source."

8 posted on 10/15/2009 8:36:51 AM PDT by the invisib1e hand (Fearing for the republic 24/7.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson