Skip to comments.
Mormons: The Most Conservative Religious Group In America
The Atlantic ^
| Jul 24 2009
| Chris Good
Posted on 07/24/2009 7:04:16 PM PDT by night reader
Mormons: The Most Conservative Religious Group In America
That's according to a new report from Pew, released today and based on data from the group's 2007 U.S. Religious Landscape Survey.
More Mormons (60 percent) identify themselves as conservatives than any other religious group; they also lead every other group in GOP party identification (at 65 percent)--much higher than the general population in both categories.
(Excerpt) Read more at politics.theatlantic.com ...
TOPICS: General Discusssion; Other Christian; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS: conservative; mormon; mormons; mythromney; pimpromney; pimpromneythread; romney; romneyrevison
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-56 next last
Well, this may get me booted as I've come to feel that LDS are
persona non grata on FR.
If so, OK. But this article seems to indicate that most of us are on the plan!
To: night reader
You’re fine posting this.
You don’t claim to have golden tablets.
2
posted on
07/24/2009 7:08:21 PM PDT
by
ConservativeMind
(The UN has never won a war, nor a conflict, but liberals want it to rule all militaries.)
To: night reader
>Well, this may get me booted as I've come to feel that LDS are persona non grata
Never noticed that.
Folks might get playful about
magic underwear . . .
To: night reader
The LDS church strikes me as a religious version of something which really is too big to die. It serves mainly as a support group for middle class people trying to raise children and also as a very necessary counterweight to the power of the fed govt. in areas in which 90% of the land is owned by BLAM. But you need to bag the sci-fi theology....
4
posted on
07/24/2009 7:11:52 PM PDT
by
wendy1946
To: night reader
Just one FReeper’s opinion:
I like, respect and admire Mormons. So much so, I am considering a move to Utah.
What turns me away from Mormons, is Mitt Romney’s flunkies attacking Sarah Palin.
If Mormons can take Mitt out behind the woodshed and break him of this bad habit, it would help both Mitt, and the LDS church - to win over those of us who actually do want to like them.
Seriously.
Someone please tell Mitt to call off his dogs.
For all of us.
5
posted on
07/24/2009 7:12:46 PM PDT
by
Cringing Negativism Network
(Governor Palin is to Comrade Zero, as Ronald Reagan was to Jimmy Carter.)
To: night reader; appleseed
6
posted on
07/24/2009 7:15:27 PM PDT
by
panaxanax
(Obama is an illegal alien.)
To: night reader
7
posted on
07/24/2009 7:15:57 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(With God all things are possible.)
To: theFIRMbss
This article was already posted. But since the replies destroyed the myth, apparently this was posted again. Harry Reid is now the great Mormon political leader. So much for conservative unity within LDS. It would be nice if Mormons would quit using FreeRepublic just to promote their church.
8
posted on
07/24/2009 7:16:59 PM PDT
by
aimhigh
To: night reader
Evidently whole denominations or known groups are rated. But there are thousands and thousands of autonomous Christian congregations around the country whose members are Constitutional conservatives.
To: aimhigh
Are Mormos the only ones who use FR to promote their church?
To: night reader
If I may paraphrase...
“For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of “conservatives”, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.”
To: Cringing Negativism Network
I’m not going to become one, but I like them too!
To: Salvation
The thread is about the conservatism of Mormons as a GROUP. It’s not a thread about their religious beliefs. I can feel pretty safe in assuming that Mormons as a GROUP voted far more Republican in the last election than did Catholics.
To: night reader
Mormons: The Most Conservative Religious Group In America Not around Chapel Hill they're not!
14
posted on
07/24/2009 7:29:07 PM PDT
by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
Romney didn’t attack Palin. That’s another ruse perpetuated by those who blindly hate Romney.
Romney DID,however, go after McCain pretty strong ... and it turns out Mitt was correct in doing so.
15
posted on
07/24/2009 7:29:53 PM PDT
by
Edit35
(.)
To: night reader
Pew is of course, the in house polling organization of the Tribune companies.
Spinning it off and giving it a new name hasn’t changed the bias it was crafted to produce.
16
posted on
07/24/2009 7:31:27 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: Edit35
To: Edit35
Romney goes after women and children. Disgusting.
Late in October, The American Spectator's The Prowler revealed:
"Former Mitt Romney presidential campaign staffers, some of whom are currently working for Sen. John McCain and Gov. Sarah Palin's bid for the White House,
have been involved in spreading anti-Palin spin to reporters, seeking to diminish her standing after the election.
'Sarah Palin is a lightweight, she won't be the first, not even the third, person people will think of when it comes to 2012,'
says one former Romney aide, now working for McCain-Palin.
'The only serious candidate ready to challenge to lead the Republican Party is Mitt Romney.
He's in charge on November 5th.'"
The Prowler added: "Some former Romney aides were behind the recent leaks to media, including CNN, that Governor Sarah Palin was a 'diva' and was going off message intentionally."
The Romney supporters in the McCain campaign had access to internal polling which indicated well in advance of the November 4 election that McCain had no chance to win.
So they began working to position their man Mitt for a run in 2012. Just two days after the election,The Palmetto Scoop reported:
"One of the first stories to hit the national airwaves was the claim of a major internal strife between close McCain aides and the folks handling his running mate Sarah Palin."
"Im told by very good sources that this was indeed the case and that a rift had developed, but it was between Palins people and the staffers brought on from the failed presidential campaign of former Gov. Mitt Romney, not McCain aides."
"The sources said nearly 80 percent of Romneys former staff was absorbed by McCain and these individuals were responsible for what amounts to a premeditated, last-minute sabotage of Palin."
These aides loyal to Romney inside the McCain campaign, said The Scoop, reportedly saw that Palin would be a serious contender for the Republican nomination in 2012 or 2016, which made her a threat to another presidential quest by Romney.
Erick Erickson, who organized Operation Leper, said:
"Heres what I think: I think there are some staffers on the McCain campaign who seriously screwed up the roll out of Sarah Palin, to which Governor Palin herself objected.
These staffers are now out trying to finish her off thinking, as typical D.C. types do, that if they dont do it to her, shell do it to them. They just never understood who Palin is or what she is about."
"Likewise, I do think there are some staffers and others who expect Mitt Romney to run again in 2012,
they decided McCain could not win, and decided to undermine Sarah Palin and her chances hoping it would ingratiate themselves with Mitt Romney."
"Who's the Palin Leaker from the McCain Campaign? (Mark Wallace, Romney pimp)
National Review Online The publication of a Vanity Fair profile of Sarah Palin
appears to have opened old wounds in the McCain campaign.
... the source of the Diva leak was Nicolle Wallaces husband."
Who benefits most from Sanford meltdown? Californian (that's right) Mitt Romney
"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"
"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"
"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"
"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"
"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"
18
posted on
07/24/2009 7:33:15 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
To: Edit35
Poor sport spoiler Romney doing what he does best. Your hero.
Novak: "Fred Thompson drop-out rumors traced to Romney campaign"
Said Novak: "The rumors were traced in part to Mitt Romney's campaign,
trying to stir up strife between McCain and Thompson."
"Despite outspending his rivals by huge margins throughout the primaries,
(Mitt Romney, Carpetbagger UT,CA,MA,NH,Mexico) lost Iowa, South Carolina, Florida and California.
The only primaries he won were in Michigan, where Dad was governor; LDS states;
and a few states on Super Tuesday in which his California-obsessed rivals
couldn't spare the cash to advertise.
Only John Connolly in 1968 had a worse cash-to-delegates ratio.
And John McCain rightly did not like Romney's tactics during the primaries.
(W)hen (Romney's early leads) started slipping away, he resorted to unfair,
distorted, scorched-earth negative ads, betting that his opponents couldn't
afford to spend enough for the truth to catch up to his charges."
[Romney: A Mistake for McCain, 7/23/2008, Dick Morris]
19
posted on
07/24/2009 7:34:52 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
To: John Leland 1789
Are Mormos the only ones who use FR to promote their church? The Catholics do that quite a bit, too.
20
posted on
07/24/2009 7:35:44 PM PDT
by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
To: theFIRMbss; wendy1946
If this article is correct, Latter-day Saints are more conservative in their politics than those who wear Fruit-of-the-Loom, and whose theology is mainstream... and isn't conservatism what FR is supposed to be all bout?
It is the nature of all religion to make perfect sense to its adherents and seem weird to nonbelievers.
21
posted on
07/24/2009 7:37:48 PM PDT
by
night reader
(NRA Life Member since 1962)
To: Edit35
If that’s true, I’d sure like to see Mitt more obviously demonstrate it.
It seemed pretty clear to me, that Mitt’s organization launched an immediate attack on Governor Palin’s qualifications with a rather thin veneer of “plausible deniability”, within 24 hours of her nomination as Vice President of the United States.
Successfully. So successfully it might be said, that America is now presided over by a MARXIST.
I’ll not say congratulations.
I’ll not spit either.
I’d prefer Mitt DEMONSTRATE good faith. To an extent as to eliminate once and for all - the suspicions of myself and so many others.
This poster still has my original “Mitt 08” bumper stickers. I donated to his campaign. I am now so apalled by what I have seen that unless Mitt does something concrete (such as perhaps teaming up *with* Palin right away for the good of our country), that I may work actively to defeat him.
He’s a smart, capable guy. He needs to lead. For all of us.
Not just for him.
Now.
To: night reader
Why does an article have more validity than, say, behavior?
23
posted on
07/24/2009 7:41:11 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
To: Cringing Negativism Network
What turns me away from Mormons, is Mitt Romneys flunkies attacking Sarah Palin. Amazing how perceptions vary! I seem to perceive Romney being attacked unfairly. But that being said, I love Sarah Palin and would vote for her in an instant. I might suggest that she put Mitt in Treasury. General Petraeus as SecDef, Ron Paul as Veep (No lefty would try to assassinate Sarah if they were afraid they'd end up with Paul in the Oval Office,)
24
posted on
07/24/2009 7:47:47 PM PDT
by
night reader
(NRA Life Member since 1962)
To: night reader
You wrote:
“Well, this may get me booted as I’ve come to feel that LDS are persona non grata on FR.”
Mormons are actually very welcome here - they just have to develop some thicker skins and learn how to defend their faith (okay, that won’t work...).
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
To: vladimir998
Mormons... just have to develop some thicker skins and learn how to defend their faith... But why should I have to defend my faith in the house of my friends? I don't attack anyone else's faith.
27
posted on
07/24/2009 8:03:39 PM PDT
by
night reader
(NRA Life Member since 1962)
To: night reader
Very good point.
I don’t recall even having seen a Mormon dismiss the faith of (any) poster here.
Ever.
Just take Mitt out behind the woodshed, please.
:)
To: night reader
>But why should I have to defend my faith in the house of my friends? I don't attack anyone else's faith
Passionate people
sometimes respond to any
discussion as an
"attack." The forum
is built for discussing things
but it can get hard
when "discussions" are
just attacks and defenses.
But time sorts that out.
To: Cringing Negativism Network
(Governor Palin is to Comrade Zero, as Ronald Reagan was to Jimmy Carter.) While we're into analogies, Harry Reid is to Mormons as Jimmy Carter is to Southern Baptists. Both may talk the talk, but they don't walk the walk!
30
posted on
07/24/2009 8:18:20 PM PDT
by
night reader
(NRA Life Member since 1962)
To: night reader
This thread is posted in the Religion Forum.
If you do not wish to see RF posts, do NOT use the "everything" option on the browse. Instead, browse by "News/Activism." When you log back in, the browse will reset to "everything" - so be sure to set it back to "News/Activism."
To: Religion Moderator
This thread is posted in the Religion Forum.
If you do not wish to see RF posts... I don't mind seeing RF posts, but see no reason for attacks. Tell me how great your religion is, not how bad mine is.
32
posted on
07/24/2009 8:25:17 PM PDT
by
night reader
(NRA Life Member since 1962)
To: night reader
I’m happy to agree with you.
As a wayward Protestant libertarian, you have just nudged me one more tiny bit toward my first step into an LDS church.
I’m not there yet, but thanks and I am on your side.
Be nice to me please when I show up on at the door, nervous. :)
To: night reader
If that is the kind of the thread you wanted, then you should have labeled it "LDS Caucus."
Click here for guidelines pertaining to the Religion Forum.
To: night reader
You wrote:
“But why should I have to defend my faith in the house of my friends?”
Friends? Don’t go all Pollyanna on me. You may have friends here, but that doesn’t mean they agree with your religion. I don’t confuse the two. You shouldn’t either.
“I don’t attack anyone else’s faith.”
So? How does that matter? Just because you refrain from doing a thing, that doesn’t mean doing that thing is wrong. And it certainly doesn’t make LDS right.
Clear thinking is always good. Not confusing one idea with another is a must.
To: night reader
Doesn’t really surprise me.
To: Diogenesis
Thanks for posting those.
To: Religion Moderator
If that is the kind of the thread you wanted, then you should have labeled it "LDS Caucus." No... having read the guidelines, I believe that Ecumenic is what I should have used. I don't mind responses from other denominations; I just don't like attacks. In addition to being LDS, I am a Son of the South (another much maligned group). My mother taught me to try to be a gentleman always ("Now, you mind your manners, boy!").
In any event, thanks for the heads-up!
38
posted on
07/24/2009 8:45:32 PM PDT
by
night reader
(NRA Life Member since 1962)
To: night reader
Ron Paul as Veep (No lefty would try to assassinate Sarah if they were afraid they'd end up with Paul in the Oval Office,) Now that's funny! :)
To: John Leland 1789
Evidently whole denominations or known groups are rated. But there are thousands and thousands of autonomous Christian congregations around the country whose members are Constitutional conservatives. Excellent (and quite true) point, which bears repeating.
I understand liberals thinking in terms of large groups, but it exasperates me when conservatives do it.
40
posted on
07/24/2009 8:57:49 PM PDT
by
Celtman
(It's never right to do wrong to do right.)
To: night reader; Jim Robinson
Well, this may get me booted as I've come to feel that LDS are persona non grata on FR.
Then you must have missed all the LDS Caucus threads.
The only Mormons I have trouble with are Mitt Romney and Harry Reid.
I'm pretty sure that same sentiment is shared by the vast majority of Freepers, including Jim Robinson
To: Artemis Webb
The thread is about the conservatism of Mormons as a GROUP. Its not a thread about their religious beliefs. I can feel pretty safe in assuming that Mormons as a GROUP voted far more Republican in the last election than did Catholics.
Probably a safe assumption.
To: Artemis Webb; SoConPubbie; night reader
I can feel pretty safe in assuming that Mormons as a GROUP voted far more Republican in the last election than did CatholicsYour assumptions would be correct - not that the Catholics like hearing it.
43
posted on
07/24/2009 10:36:52 PM PDT
by
Alex Murphy
("I always longed for repose and quiet" - John Calvin)
To: night reader
Mitt Romney was destroyed on his religion by axelrod/dnc. That was wy out of line. What is Obama’s religion. Just curious. L Ron Hubbard?
44
posted on
07/24/2009 10:51:05 PM PDT
by
circumbendibus
(Where's the Birth Certificate?)
To: circumbendibus
No one would have known Romney’s religion if he
and his RomneyBOTs did not bring it up all the time,
use it continuously as an excuse for his bad performance,
and use it to falsely accuse everyone of “hate” when
they did not bow before, and vote for, demented Romney.
45
posted on
07/25/2009 2:58:28 AM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("Those who go below the surface do so at their peril" - Oscar Wilde)
To: vladimir998
And Protestants dont? Not nearly as much as the Catholics, no.
46
posted on
07/25/2009 6:13:00 AM PDT
by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
You wrote:
“Not nearly as much as the Catholics, no.”
“Not nearly as much,” still means YES.
To: vladimir998
So? Never said they didn’t, just that Catholics tend to spam up the forum with their stuff much more than do the Lutherans or Presbyterians.
48
posted on
07/25/2009 7:17:12 AM PDT
by
Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
(We bury Democrats face down so that when they scratch, they get closer to home.)
To: Celtman
Evidently whole denominations or known groups are rated. But there are thousands and thousands of autonomous Christian congregations around the country whose members are Constitutional conservatives.Yeah, but these groups don't have a multi-million dollar per year public relations firm making sure they are in the newspapers and other public venues...although that kinda bit the mormons on the Prop8 matter.
Mormons have learned that two things have aided their public persona through the years....playing the "persecution" card and getting the message out that they are "special", even though as a general rule, they have as many troubled souls among their numbers as any other group of people.
Spoken from experience, as one who was born mormon and has lived in mormon enclaves a good portion of my life.
49
posted on
07/25/2009 7:28:30 AM PDT
by
greyfoxx39
(There is no justice at the Dept. of Justice when Black Panthers are cleared for terrorizing voters.)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
You wrote:
“So? Never said they didnt, just that Catholics tend to spam up the forum with their stuff much more than do the Lutherans or Presbyterians.”
Spam? No. Multiple posts - and I mean MULTIPLE - posts on Calvin’s birthday is spaming up a forum. Also, I think Protestant posters used to post much more often than they do now. Why they stopped posting as much as they used to, I don’t know.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-56 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson