Skip to comments.
Hindu extremists wreck plans for statue of 'Christian' Charlie Chaplin
Times Online UK ^
| March 16, 2009
| Rhys Blakely
Posted on 03/17/2009 12:27:39 PM PDT by Alex Murphy
He fought Fascism in the 1940s armed with little more than a crumpled suit, a bemused look and funny walk. Now Charlie Chaplin is embroiled in another battle of beliefs, this time with Indias Hindu extremists.
Radicals in the southern state of Karnataka have stymied plans to erect a 20m (67ft) statue of the film star because he was a Christian. The move comes amid a campaign against Western culture that has raised concerns that parts of India are being Talebanised by Hinduisms far Right.
The Chaplin sculpture, which would have shown him in his baggy trousers and bowler hat, was being built at a cost of about 3.5 million rupees (£48,600) near the town of Udupi, the site of several important Hindu temples. It was to form part of a set for a dance routine in a film but work ground to a halt when Hindu activists chased the workers away and buried the materials.
Hemant Hegde, the film-maker, told local reporters that he abandoned the project after being threatened by a mob of 50 people whose leader told him: We will not allow you to construct a statue of a Christian actor.
The protesters were said to belong to the Hindu Jagarna Vedike (Hindu Enlightenment Group), a group linked to an attack on a Christian school in the same state last May. They demanded that Mr Hegde instead erect a statue of Swami Vivekananda, a 19th-century Hindu missionary to the West.
Mr Hegde told a local TV channel: Im really surprised that people would associate Charlie Chaplin with being a Christian and not allow the statue. Chaplin, whose 1940 masterwork The Great Dictator mocked Hitler and Nazism, might also have been confused: the British-born actor was baptised into the Church of England but later avowed himself agnostic.
(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Eastern Religions; Mainline Protestant; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics
KEYWORDS:
Mr Hegde told a local TV channel: Im really surprised that people would associate Charlie Chaplin with being a Christian and not allow the statue. Chaplin, whose 1940 masterwork The Great Dictator mocked Hitler and Nazism, might also have been confused: the British-born actor was baptised into the Church of England but later avowed himself agnostic.
To: Alex Murphy
I wasn’t aware that Chaplain was a Christian, but then, I’ve only seen a couple of his movies and know nothing of his personal life.
2
posted on
03/17/2009 12:30:02 PM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: Alex Murphy
Charlie Chaplin a Christian?
Kinda doubt it.
3
posted on
03/17/2009 12:30:12 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(Mornie` utulie`. Mornie` alantie`.)
To: Alex Murphy
“Im really surprised that people would associate Charlie Chaplin with being a Christian”
Maybe they got his name mixed up and thought he was “Chaplin Charlie”.
To: Alex Murphy
I could think of many reasons not to make statues of actors, and not to make 67ft statues of anyone, but this one really boggles the mind.
5
posted on
03/17/2009 12:32:58 PM PDT
by
annalex
(http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
To: Alex Murphy
Chaplin only fought Fascism because he was a Communist. He also left the U.S. because his anti-Americanism caused such a backlash. Of course, later he was adored and celebrated by Hollywood with an honorary Oscar. Now people just talk about his “left-leaning politics”, if at all.
6
posted on
03/17/2009 12:39:21 PM PDT
by
Deb
(Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
To: Alex Murphy

62-foot Charlie Chaplin statue in Karnataka, thanks to film
7 Mar 2009, 1121 hrs IST, IANS
BANGALORE: Beautiful Maravanthe beach will soon get a 62-foot-high statue of master comedian Charlie Chaplin, thanks to a film being shot there. The
crew hopes their efforts will find a place in the Guinness Book of World Records.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Cities/62-foot-Charlie-Chaplin-statue-in-Karnataka-thanks-to-film/rssarticleshow/4237904.cms
BJP activists attack 'Christian' Chaplin statue
15 Mar 2009, 0050 hrs IST, TNN
BANGALORE: The last laugh may be on Charlie Chaplin, cinema's funny man who mocked prejudice and fascism. The Left-leaning, suspected communist sympathizer was called many names during his eventful life, but `Christian' wasn't one of them. But the new tag comes courtesy BJP activists in Baindur, near Udupi. They have blocked installation of Chaplins statue saying it would hurt Hindu sentiment.
The statue was being put up by Karnataka film director Hemant Hegde for the shoot of his
movie `Housefull' and was meant for a song sequence. On Friday, local BJP leader Suresh Batwadi stopped the film unit from going ahead with the project, claiming that the land on which the statue was to be erected belonged to the Someshwara temple and the crew lacked the requisite permissions.
Hegde said he had obtained all the clearances and had discussed the shoot with the officials. "I had apprised the gram panchayat and the Udupi deputy commissioner. The BJP activists questioned me as to why I was not installing Vivekananda's statue," he said. He said he planned to shift the shoot elsewhere.
While condemnation poured in from artistes, the local authorities said they couldn't do anything because there was "no complaint registered".
The government is backing the protesters. Home minister V S Acharya, who is in Udupi, told TOI that locals had every right to show their concern. He dismissed reports that BJP workers had objected because Chaplin was a "Christian and not Indian".
"It is all fabrication, and a communal colour is being given to it. The local people have valid objections that a statue of 67 feet and of a permanent nature cannot be established." He also claimed permissions had not been obtained.
But the police chief had a different take. "As the location is near a temple, the local people are against installing a Chaplin statue and instead want one of Vivekananda. We will wait for the deputy commissioner's opinion and take suitable action based on that," said Gopal B Hosur, deputy inspector general of police.
Udupi's deputy commissioner of police Hemalatha admitted that Hegde and his team had discussed the shooting schedule and had sought permission for the statue.
"I accorded oral permission for a permanent statue at the place where they were constructing on Friday. The official allotment of land was made at the lower level of the revenue department."
"In the last year, episodes of communal intolerance have been shameful events for Karnataka. It's not only because Chaplin's statue is being opposed, it's because these elements are unconstitutional. The constitution allows you the freedom to express your religion. Then how can these extra-constitutional bodies take over?" asked Girish Kasaravalli, noted Kannada film-maker.
Added Jayamala, actress and president of the Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce, "How can anyone discriminate against an artist on the basis of religion or caste? Chaplin belongs to all."
Rajeev Gowda, IIM-B professor and Congress politician, said, "These people must be crazy. Chaplin was an artiste who made movies against dictatorship, against the oppression of workers. He united workers and doesn't belong only to the West."
However, local BJP legislator K Lakshminarayana was unapologetic about supporting fellow partyman Suresh Batwadi's fatwa for the removal of the statue. "If the locals are against such a statue, I am also against it. Why should one bother so much about Charlie Chaplin, who was not even an Indian? Who is worried about the Guinness Book of
Records for the statue? If we really need one, we can think of installing a Hanuman statue."
Hegde, fearing further trouble and vandalism, has decided to seek other sites now. He has gone to Uttara Kannada and is considering Om beach at Gokarna, or perhaps Karwar, as alternate locations. He has not approached the police, fearing that frequent trips to the police station and the courts would upset his shooting schedule.
Times View: Hindutva brigands attacking a statue of Charlie Chaplin on the grounds that he was a Christian and having his statue close to a temple was offensive to Hindu sentiments may appear too bizzare to be taken seriously. It is indeed ludicrous. But unless such groups are dealt with summarily and the nuisance nipped in the bud, what seems farcical today could become tragically real tomorrow. The state government must show that it will not allow such lumpen activity to go unpunished. It must crack down hard to deter potential imitators of such trends.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/BJP-activists-attack-Christian-Chaplin-statue/articleshow/4265487.cms
7
posted on
03/17/2009 12:44:34 PM PDT
by
MyTwoCopperCoins
(I don't have a license to kill; I have a learner's permit.)
To: Deb
He wasn’t a communist. He got on the wrong said of J. Edgar Hoover and made some leftist remarks during the Depression.
As for being a Christian — he was a non-practicing Christian. His brother was half-Jewish, hence his hatred of Hitler.
8
posted on
03/17/2009 12:44:50 PM PDT
by
durasell
To: durasell
9
posted on
03/17/2009 12:46:39 PM PDT
by
Deb
(Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
To: annalex; Alex Murphy
The land belongs to a temple, and the film crew want to construct a permanent statue on it, with the “oral permission” of a local politician, who wants to put a communal spin against those who don’t want a gigantic statue of an actor, in what is a religious place.
10
posted on
03/17/2009 12:46:48 PM PDT
by
MyTwoCopperCoins
(I don't have a license to kill; I have a learner's permit.)
To: Deb
I’ve read several books on him, including his autobiography and communism was never mentioned, except in passing. Do you have a source?
11
posted on
03/17/2009 12:49:30 PM PDT
by
durasell
To: MyTwoCopperCoins
I agree it’s a horrible idea even not on temple grounds; I couldn’t resist laughing at this characterization of Chaplin though.
12
posted on
03/17/2009 12:52:51 PM PDT
by
annalex
(http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
To: durasell
Gee, he never mentioned he was a Communist in his own bio? What a shock. That must prove it. Try reading any account of his life that wasn’t written during the white-washing period. I suppose Paul Robeson wasn’t either.
13
posted on
03/17/2009 12:54:28 PM PDT
by
Deb
(Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
To: Alex Murphy
I’m sick of Hindus, Charlie Chaplin notwithstanding.
14
posted on
03/17/2009 1:05:40 PM PDT
by
onedoug
To: Deb
Again, do you have a source?
What was the “white washing” period? I’ll check the copyright dates.
15
posted on
03/17/2009 1:07:16 PM PDT
by
durasell
To: durasell
The whitewash period was anything written during the period when they referred to the House Un-American Activities hearings as "Witch Hunts".
You don't get thrown out of the country just because you date and marry children...or land on the "wrong side of J.E. Hoover."
16
posted on
03/17/2009 1:16:17 PM PDT
by
Deb
(Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
To: Deb
He wasn’t “thrown out.” He was denied re-entrance after he left to promote a film in Europe.
His films, which regularly ridiculed the rich as well as government authorities, were seen as leftist.
17
posted on
03/17/2009 1:20:07 PM PDT
by
durasell
To: onedoug
Home minister V S Acharya, who is in Udupi, told TOI that locals had every right to show their concern. He dismissed reports that BJP workers had objected because Chaplin was a "Christian and not Indian". "It is all fabrication, and a communal colour is being given to it. The local people have valid objections that a statue of 67 feet and of a permanent nature cannot be established." He also claimed permissions had not been obtained.
18
posted on
03/17/2009 1:20:12 PM PDT
by
MyTwoCopperCoins
(I don't have a license to kill; I have a learner's permit.)
To: durasell
He was thrown out because he was a Communist.
19
posted on
03/17/2009 1:22:06 PM PDT
by
Deb
(Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
To: Deb
No, he was denied re-entrance. It isn’t a fine distinction. Nobody, anywhere claims that he was deported.
20
posted on
03/17/2009 1:24:21 PM PDT
by
durasell
To: durasell
He knew when he left he would not be permitted to return because he was a Communist. So, he threw himself out...same difference.
You are really looking stupid, but I'm having fun.
21
posted on
03/17/2009 1:27:58 PM PDT
by
Deb
(Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
To: Deb
He threw himself out? Why didn’t his brother, Sid, go along? Why did he leave a ton of businesses behind and not liquidate them?
22
posted on
03/17/2009 1:32:49 PM PDT
by
durasell
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson