Posted on 03/08/2009 5:04:58 AM PDT by GonzoII
Kindly point out where I "denied" the mass murder of non-Jews by the Nazis? (And btw, I am a non-Jew.).
Thank you. You should also keep an eye on someone who thinks that homosexuality is a capital crime in the name of religion.
Male homosexuality is a capital crime under the Laws of G-d. There is nothing that you, I, or anyone else can do about this. However, I doubt that any Nazi courts were Noachide courts (which require only eyewitnesses and accept neither confessions nor circumstantial evidence and which permits non-Jews to execute only via "the sword").
I understand your point and don't deny it. I was wondering if you could refer me to some "cool-headed" websites that go into the Holocaust, showing orders from Hitler and other documents and such? I could search myself but perhaps you've searched around already..
"What is the term for people slaughtered by Stalin? By Genghis Khan? By Attila the Hun? By Mao? By Pol Pot? By Basil the Bulgar Slayer? "
They are victims of Me, myself and "I"sm, stoked on by Satan; as the unborn know are.
In fairness to those who say Gypsies and others were also victims of the Holocaust, I was also wondering if there are any documents showing a "final solution" for them also? If there are it seems they would be just in complaining, if they have, that the Holocaust issue has been turned into a Jewish matter only.
The Jews were, are, and ever will be the absolute center of the worldview of all Nazis (hence their cooperation with moslems even today).
know are.=now are.
And yes, there are documents showing it was official policy. Google for "Heydrich-Endlosung.jpg"
And for a summary in English, you might try this: What was the final solution?
On the other point being discussed, the killing of massive numbers of people, I strongly recommend Rummel's research on democide (which is exhaustive on his website and therefore difficult to navigate) - but is summarized here
Thanks for the links.
If you'd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
----------------------------
Catholic ping!
The truth always hurts.
Saying the Holocaust was a Jewish issue is a form of Holocaust denial. Only about half of the folks exterminated by the Nazis were Jewish.
And while you are listing the collaborators, don’t forget the Jewish leaders who collaborated with the Nazis, some under duress, some more freely.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/judenrat.html
Hitler never signed any of the documents setting the 'Final Solution' into motion. It stretches credulity, however, to suggest that he was unaware of what was being carried out in his name.
There is no doubt that Hitler’s strange obsession with the Jews was one of the cornerstone’s of his policy. It went far beyond antisemticism, displaying a hatred that was personal and deep-rooted.
It's really tiresome to have to say this over and over again.
Hitler had some eleven million human beings murdered. No one is denying that. But the Jewish people were the object of his deepest hate and the term "the Holocaust" and its equivalents refers specifically to the attempt to eradicate the Jewish nation from the face of the earth as his ancient `Amaleqi ancestors also tried to do.
To refer to this position, that "the Holocaust" refers specifically to the attempt to exterminate the Jews (G-d forbid!) and not to all the other victims, as "Holocaust denial" is on a par with comparing Israel to the Nazis (G-d forbid!).
He was a descendant of the evil `Amaleq. The destruction of Israel, in order to prove that the world is purposeless and random, is `Amaleq's undying mission until they are destroyed utterly (may this happen immediately!).
Don't leave out IHR (spit!).
In a just and honest world, Pius XII would need a forest to pay him tribute.
To add some detail to the raging debate above about the definition of the word holocaust. A dictionary definition follows :
1. a great or complete devastation or destruction, esp. by fire.
2. a sacrifice completely consumed by fire; burnt offering.
3. (usually initial capital letter) the systematic mass slaughter of European Jews in Nazi concentration camps during World War II (usually prec. by the).
4. any mass slaughter or reckless destruction of life.
Good for him. Why on earth should he be expected to endorse a lie?
Thank you, Petronski.
Reading your posts, I think I have found the first issue on which we agree profoundly.
There had to be at least one, right?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.