Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NFL Team Can Keep 'Redskins' Trademark
Yahoo! News (AP) ^ | 10/1/2003 | Sam Hananel

Posted on 10/01/2003 10:16:03 AM PDT by Pyro7480

NFL Team Can Keep 'Redskins' Trademark

By SAM HANANEL, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - A federal judge has overturned a ruling revoking the Washington Redskins trademark, finding there was insufficient evidence to conclude that the name is disparaging to American Indians.

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly issued the ruling in connection with a 1999 decision by a panel of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. But she also made clear that her ruling does not address the issue of whether the name "Redskins" actually is offensive to Indians.

Redskins spokesman Karl Swanson said the team hadn't reviewed the entire ruling but "from what we've been told by our attorneys, we are pleased."

If the team lost, it could have been stripped of the exclusive rights to market the Redskins name.

The lawsuit began in 1992 when seven American Indians, led by Suzan Shown Harjo, asked the trademark office to cancel six trademarks containing the word "Redskin." In 1999, the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board granted a petition to cancel the team's trademark registrations because of a federal law, the Lanham Act, prohibiting registering "disparaging" names.

In her 84-page decision, issued late Tuesday, Kollar-Kotelly also found that the plaintiffs waited too long to make their claims under the law, which was in effect when the Redskins trademarks were registered in 1967.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: courts; lanhamact; nfl; racism; redskins; trademark
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
A little sanity returns to the courts!
1 posted on 10/01/2003 10:16:04 AM PDT by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Interesting. I still believe it is a disparaging mascot, but the courts have spoken. back to work....
2 posted on 10/01/2003 10:18:46 AM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (I'm normally not a praying man, but if you're up there, please save me Superman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Weren't they the Duluth Eskimos at one time?
3 posted on 10/01/2003 10:19:32 AM PDT by akorahil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
I understand the argument, but it's not meant to demoralize people. It's actually meant to praise them.
4 posted on 10/01/2003 10:19:54 AM PDT by rs79bm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe
I believe Redskins were the ones that helped name them "Redskins" in the first place!
5 posted on 10/01/2003 10:20:08 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (If it weren't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMan55
Somebody send this to Rush!
6 posted on 10/01/2003 10:20:42 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (If it weren't for double standards, liberals would have no standards at all!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
At least they don't call themselves the "Washington Savages," or the "Washington Firewater Drinkers."
7 posted on 10/01/2003 10:21:04 AM PDT by My2Cents (Well...there you go again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
yay! thank God for that too, otherwse the Fighting Irish would be sued by Irish people, and the Falcons would be sued by birdwatchers!
8 posted on 10/01/2003 10:21:29 AM PDT by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Actually, I have always believed that the name was disparaging as well as the Canucks.
When the Redskins were formed in Boston, there were similar sentiments conveyed when they chose that as their name.
9 posted on 10/01/2003 10:21:58 AM PDT by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Washington Redksins BUMP!!

10 posted on 10/01/2003 10:22:22 AM PDT by jgrubbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
This has much more to do with economic and political clout than it does with justice. "Redskin" is racist in any context.
11 posted on 10/01/2003 10:23:09 AM PDT by Kleon (To see what is in front of one's nose needs a constant struggle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Well, while I personally find the term "redskin" as offensive as if someone called blacks "BlackSkins", or asians "YellowSkins", I never could see the point of making a federal case out of it...
12 posted on 10/01/2003 10:23:59 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks (<Tag>Something unspeakably clever</Tag>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kleon
so is "cracker" and "nigger" but many minorities excercise those words with impunity.
13 posted on 10/01/2003 10:24:34 AM PDT by MacDorcha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
And if they created a professional team named after one of those slurs, I would expect the court to thry and block them.
14 posted on 10/01/2003 10:26:57 AM PDT by Kleon (To see what is in front of one's nose needs a constant struggle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly
found the litigant's case to be smelly
so Washington wins
sing "Hail to the Redskins"
And go put some beer in your belly
15 posted on 10/01/2003 10:27:52 AM PDT by ko_kyi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jgrubbs
Spurrier sucks. :)P
16 posted on 10/01/2003 10:27:58 AM PDT by TheBigB ("Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats." --P.J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
I'd imagine that the court's ruling would've been different if the team in question were named the "Yellowskins" or the "Blackskins."
17 posted on 10/01/2003 10:30:16 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
It would have been a pity if we lost the Redskins fight song.
"Hail to the Chestnut Shirts" would not have worked.
18 posted on 10/01/2003 10:30:44 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MacDorcha
A group of Native American and non-Indian students of the University of Northern Colorado came up with the "Fighting Whites" to deliver a simple, sincere, message about ethnic stereotyping. I'm white, and I don't find it offensive.


19 posted on 10/01/2003 10:31:11 AM PDT by jgrubbs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
These are the two most popular jackets worn by Indians on the Flathead Indian Reservation where I am employed.

>
20 posted on 10/01/2003 10:33:47 AM PDT by GunnyHartman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson