To: Orangedog
For starters, nobody is disputing that she tried to bite police officers. It's ridiculous to claim that anyone has the right to physically attack police officers, even if they're old and blind.
5 posted on
10/01/2003 9:45:11 AM PDT by
xm177e2
(Stalinists, Maoists, Ba'athists, Pacifists: Why are they always on the same side?)
To: xm177e2
What you said.
6 posted on
10/01/2003 9:48:22 AM PDT by
annyokie
(One good thing about being wrong is the joy it brings to others.)
To: xm177e2
"For starters, nobody is disputing that she tried to bite police officers."Oh yeah...were her dentures in?? Good gosh...thse officers could have been in for a serious gumming....Oh the horror!
Dentures = Assault with a deadly weapon...
When dentures are outlawed, only outlaws will have dentures....
NeverGore :^)
7 posted on
10/01/2003 9:50:12 AM PDT by
nevergore
(Please return your seat trays and seat backs to their full and upright position....)
To: xm177e2
It's ridiculous to claim that anyone has the right to physically attack police officers,
even if they're old and blind.Are there old and blind police officers?
To: xm177e2
For starters, nobody is disputing that she tried to bite police officers. It's ridiculous to claim that anyone has the right to physically attack police officers, even if they're old and blind. Let me get this straight...The brave policemen felt it was an appropriate use of force to pepper spray and taser a 70 year old woman because she bit one of them. How many cops does it take to restrain a 70 year old woman? If there was more than one cop there and they really felt justified in using a taser and pepper spray on a woman in her 70's then they shouldn't have a badge and a gun.
28 posted on
10/01/2003 3:26:53 PM PDT by
Orangedog
(Soccer-Moms are the biggest threat to your freedoms and the republic !)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson