Skip to comments.
US Government - Bin Laden and Iraq Agreed to Cooperate on Weapons Development
New York Times, Facts on File World News Digest
| Novemeber 1998
| BENJAMIN WEISER
Posted on 09/19/2003 3:03:29 PM PDT by tallhappy
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-160 next last
To: cyncooper
Their legacy seems to be a lot of fiddle music.
81
posted on
09/20/2003 12:34:12 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
(nd)
To: tallhappy
Excuse me .. don't you know there's no connection between Saddam and Usama ..??
82
posted on
09/20/2003 12:51:56 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - "The Greatest Nation on the Face of the Earth")
To: RobbyS
Their legacy seems to be a lot of fiddle music. Worse.
Fiddling when in power. Lying about the facts to undermine the Bush administration now that they're out of power.
Stunning, but there it is.
83
posted on
09/20/2003 12:59:41 PM PDT
by
cyncooper
(I believe VP Cheney)
To: RDangerfield
"Apparently the President, Rice and Rumsfeld don't agree with you or New York Times and Facts on File. They state flatly that they have no such evidence."
I have myself heard from Cheney that they have no link between Al Queada and September 11, 2001, but that there is plenty of links between Al Queada and Saddam's Iraq.
To: tallhappy
Fabulous research Mr. Happy. Thank you very much. I did not know this.
To: tallhappy
From New York Times and Facts on File -- articles from November 1998.
Will the New York Times claim that they lied to their archives...???
86
posted on
09/20/2003 8:57:43 PM PDT
by
okie01
(www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
To: thtr
"Thats pure speculation, not fact. It even says alleged surely you knew what alleged means?"
Yes, it means that it has not gone through a trial. It has, however gone through a 2 year grand jury process and an indictment was handed down. That means it is not speculatio without fact either.
To: tallhappy
Great post. Thanks.
88
posted on
09/20/2003 9:30:28 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: tallhappy
Bump.
Why doesn't Clare explain why the Clinton administration officially stated Iraq and al Qaeda were working to together specifically for weaposns development.
"In addition, al Qaeda reached an understanding with the Government of Iraq that al Qaeda would not work against that government and that on particular projects, specifically including weapons development, al Qaeda would work cooperatively with the Government of Iraq," the indictment said.
From the US State Department, Nov.4, 1998.
89
posted on
03/30/2004 8:47:51 AM PST
by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: xzins; Elkiejg; VaBthang4; 68-69TonkinGulfYatchClub; Blueflag; Travis McGee; aristeides; ...
Bump.
Above should, of course, be:
Why doesn't Clarke explain why the Clinton administration officially stated Iraq and al Qaeda were working to together specifically for weaposns development.
90
posted on
03/30/2004 8:51:29 AM PST
by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: tallhappy
I have never seen that before. It is chilling.
And they knew this!
These Democrats are not just involved in the character assassination of Pres. Bush, but they are engaged in treasonous dishonesty...at best criminal negligence.
Awesome post!
You should make it its own thread.
91
posted on
03/30/2004 8:58:01 AM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!)
To: Revelation 911; The Grammarian; SpookBrat; Alamo-Girl; betty boop; Dust in the Wind; maestro; ...
Check out basic article and link at post #89
92
posted on
03/30/2004 9:06:41 AM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!)
To: xzins
Unbelievable. Someone needs to start trumpeting this...The Bush administration, conservative talking heads, somebody.
93
posted on
03/30/2004 9:52:38 AM PST
by
opus86
To: xzins
I haven't had time to make it its own post yet.
I posted this last September and now with the Clarke assault it is even more relevant.
Clarke most likely was involved in the background for the bin Laden indictment.
He needs to be asked about this.
94
posted on
03/30/2004 10:05:27 AM PST
by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: tallhappy
Ping me when or if you post it. Thanks. Great stuff!
95
posted on
03/30/2004 10:30:00 AM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!)
To: xzins
Bump!
96
posted on
04/01/2004 8:16:12 PM PST
by
Alamo-Girl
(Glad to be a monthly contributor to Free Republic!)
To: tallhappy
97
posted on
05/03/2004 12:46:25 PM PDT
by
nw_arizona_granny
(Google search: name of America's enemy within (also try with 1425 in front of search))
To: tallhappy
Ahem. I am sorry, but there is way too much for me to read here. Where is my 6-second sound bite. Move along.
To: RDangerfield
99
posted on
05/03/2004 12:57:45 PM PDT
by
petercooper
(I just discovered my family owns an SUV.)
To: nw_arizona_granny
clinton to take first nuclear strikeWas there a document for that statement?
100
posted on
06/18/2004 12:47:34 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 141-160 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson