Skip to comments.
Stone Age Settlements Found Underwater In Britain
Reuters/Yahoo ^
| 9-11-2003
Posted on 09/11/2003 11:37:31 AM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
1
posted on
09/11/2003 11:37:32 AM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
Building a town underwater...no wonder they died out.
2
posted on
09/11/2003 11:43:40 AM PDT
by
Lee Heggy
(Jealousy-The theory that some other fellow has just as little taste.)
To: blam
SPOTREP
To: blam
It's Atlantis!
To: Lee Heggy
Building a town underwater...no wonder they died outLOL!
5
posted on
09/11/2003 11:46:41 AM PDT
by
RoughDobermann
(Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.)
To: blam
Missed Tech Tuesday? Become a Wireless Whiz -- get connected in every room and secure your wireless network in six stepsWow. I guess they were more advanced than previously realized...
6
posted on
09/11/2003 11:47:58 AM PDT
by
RoughDobermann
(Nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.)
To: blam
Image of inhabitants:
7
posted on
09/11/2003 11:54:37 AM PDT
by
Salgak
(don't mind me: the orbital mind control lasers are making me write this. . .)
To: blam
8
posted on
09/11/2003 11:56:13 AM PDT
by
KantianBurke
(The Federal govt should be protecting us from terrorists, not handing out goodies)
To: blam
It must be real old, like before we got rid of the gills & walked up the muddy banks.
9
posted on
09/11/2003 12:08:47 PM PDT
by
ctlpdad
(In memory of my good friend Henry's daughter, lost 9/11/01)
To: KantianBurke
Is that you, Lord Elron?
;)
To: farmfriend
The stone age builders still have relatives living in the area, confirmed by DNA testing.
Cheddar Man (9,000 Years Old)
11
posted on
09/11/2003 12:16:03 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
they found flint artifacts Now that's talent, to be able to make a spark underwater.
To: OXENinFLA
13
posted on
09/11/2003 12:21:09 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam
With only a little help from erosion, maybe future archaeologists will be able to examine Barbara Streisand's underwater house.
14
posted on
09/11/2003 12:44:10 PM PDT
by
KarlInOhio
(Fight Czarism in America!)
To: Lee Heggy
They must have been stewed to the gills.
15
posted on
09/11/2003 12:45:33 PM PDT
by
Consort
To: ctlpdad
To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
Serious question.
How much lower was "sea level" 10,000 years ago? Anybody know?
17
posted on
09/11/2003 1:02:32 PM PDT
by
Publius6961
(californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
To: blam
18
posted on
09/11/2003 1:11:21 PM PDT
by
itsahoot
To: Publius6961
How much lower was "sea level" 10,000 years ago? Anybody know?Around 300 ft., At least enough to expose the land bridge from Siberia to Alaska.
To bad Saudi isn't about 300 ft. lower.
To: Publius6961
"How much lower was "sea level" 10,000 years ago? Anybody know?" 300-500FT, most accept about 400ft.
20
posted on
09/11/2003 4:25:35 PM PDT
by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
