Martyred mom of 13 mourned

NY Daily News ^ | August 21 2003 | LARRY COHLER-ESSES, ERIC HERMAN and DAVE GOLDINER

[Catspaw]

Of course, you didn't answer my question, now did you?

I want you to tell me why a five-month-old baby is responsible for his own death because of the residence of his parents.

You won't answer that. You'll just call me names. It's quite the dodge.

[Hank Rearden]

I want you to tell me why a five-month-old baby is responsible for his own death because of the residence of his parents.

The stupidity of that question answers itself. I suggest you step back, take a deep breath and actually read what you've been posting before you post again. It's just bizarre.

[KantianBurke]

Did you even bother to process what I wrote? The community the child was brought up in had some shady deals with Hillarly for pardons. This does NOT justify a little kid or anyone else being killed. However Hillarly's close connection to Islamic terrorists should have nixed a priori any sort of bargains with that community. The immorality of the deal itself stands by itself.

[Catspaw]

Some people would, it's appeared on several threads mentioning her home. After all, if Bush was elected things like this wouldn't happen.

Yes, this reference has appeared on other threads, as if a 5 month old infant has control of where he's born and where he lives. It's the baby's fault, you know, because of some weird, overarching, overreaching connection to Hillary--as if a baby born in March, 2003 would have been voting in the 2000 election. But then, there's the argument that well, gee, maybe the parents did, or at least the rabbi.

Gimme a break. It's a ludicrous argument--and when pressed, instead of answering questions, they practice avoidance by name-calling.

[Catspaw]

This is what you said.

Ummm, his parents' rabbi sold his soul to Hillary for cash?

This was your response to the terrorist murder of a five-month-old baby.

You haven't retracted your statement, so it stands on its own as your honest answer.

[Hank Rearden]

You haven't retracted your statement, so it stands on its own as your honest answer.

Well, yeah. The town's leadership cabal escaped responsibility for shady dealings in an arrangement with Hillary's campaign, as I recall now from reports of the time. So what's your point, other than ranting about 5-month-old babies not voting??

I think it's time to leave this line of inquiry to history; it's like practicing the socratic method with my dog. Diverting, but not productive.

[Catspaw]

I see you still haven't explained why a five-month-old infant is to blame for his death because of the place of his birth--except to say his rabbi sold his soul.