[Burkeman1]

Debate the article- not the man.

[quidnunc]

Burkeman1 wrote: Debate the article- not the man.

Nah, because of the man the article is bound to be crap.

Dennis never writes anything worth debating.

[Burkeman1]

Just read and debate the article. If it is lies then Freepers should be able to tear it apart on the merits.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

Just how long have you had your Ramaindo habit?

[ladyinred]

Debate the article- not the man.

Yes, master

[ellery]

"But Democracy is not easy. Our own histories should remind us that the union of democratic principle and practice is always a work in progress. When the Founding Fathers said "We the People," they did not mean us. Our ancestors were considered three-fifths of a person. America has made great strides to overcome its birth defects – but the struggle has been long and the cost has been high."

Here's what Dr. Rice said. Do you deny that these words are true?

[ellery]

We are at war. 9/11 made that plain enough. But the problem with the "war on terrorism" from the beginning has been the elusive nature of the enemy.

This is like saying the trouble with "World War I" was all those armed Germans in trenches.

I don't know why the author author creates a conspiracy out of the unsurprising possibility that there are people at the second and third tier of our enemy's organization who might not be hardcore Muslims. Using a rogue point to try to deny the existence of an entire bell curve is either stupid or dishonest. I can see why other Freepers don't bother with this.

[Luis Gonzalez]

"It would it be too politically incorrect to note that two out of three of the conspirators might be said to embody the Indo-Israeli alliance."

More absurd, bullsh%t "it's the JUUUS" conspiracy theory garbage from Justin.

[Justin Raimondo]

Anyone who wants to read a (relatively) coherent thread on this subject should go here:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/963515/posts?q=1&&page=51