Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Indicts Porn Sellers, Vowing Extensive Attack
Los Angeles Times ^ | August 8, 2003 | P.J. Huffstutter, Times Staff Writer

Posted on 08/08/2003 12:16:04 PM PDT by Desmond

The Justice Department on Thursday charged a North Hollywood wholesaler of adult films with violating federal obscenity laws, launching the first of what it promised would be a wave of criminal cases against purveyors of pornography.

The 10-count federal grand jury indictment against Extreme Associates and its executives, Robert Zicari and Janet Romano of Northridge, raised alarm among adult entertainment companies in the San Fernando Valley, which is considered the capital of the nation's multibillion-dollar pornography industry.

Atty. Gen. John Ashcroft promised upon taking office that he would crack down on the distributors of adult entertainment material such as movies, magazines and Web sites, much as his Reagan administration predecessor Edwin Meese III did in the 1980s.

Thursday's indictment came after investigators with the U.S. Postal Inspection Service set up a sting operation in Pennsylvania. From September 2002 through July 2003, the indictment says, the defendants sold allegedly obscene material over the Internet and distributed videotapes and DVDs across state lines through the postal system, a violation of federal law.

Extreme Associates produces movies such as "Extreme Teen #24" and "Forced Entry — Directors Cut," which depict the fictional rapes and murders of several women, according to court documents.

The privately held company employs 15 people and has annual sales of $20 million to $49.9 million, according to the U.S. Business Directory.

Zicari and Romano are scheduled to be arraigned in Pittsburgh on Aug. 27.

If convicted, Zicari, 29, also known as Rob Black, and Romano, 26, also known as Lizzie Borden, each could face as much as 50 years in prison and a fine of $2.5 million. The company could pay a fine of as much as $5 million.

"Every time we get a Republican administration, these kinds of cases seem to perk up," said lawyer Elliot Abelson, who defended the industry in obscenity cases from the late 1970s to the mid-'80s.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: ashcroft; pornography
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-216 next last
Assuming that no other laws are broken, I am very live-and-let-live towards these people no matter how disgusting they get. However, they do seem to have broken some laws. "[T]he defendants sold allegedly obscene material over the Internet and distributed videotapes and DVDs across state lines through the postal system, a violation of federal law." Sounds like a dumb law on first blush, though.

Mostly I think, though, doesn't his office have better things to do than fight a losing battle against fringe (adult) porn makers and distributors? This all sounds retarded.

1 posted on 08/08/2003 12:16:04 PM PDT by Desmond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Desmond
Wow, the Director's Cut of "Forced Entry" is finally out? That's great news. Now his true vision for the picture can be appreciated.
2 posted on 08/08/2003 12:17:52 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
"[T]he defendants sold allegedly obscene material over the Internet and distributed videotapes and DVDs across state lines through the postal system, a violation of federal law." Sounds like a dumb law on first blush, though.

Perhaps you would prefer these laws be repealed so porno junk mail will fill you mailbox at home the way porno spam fills email inboxes.

3 posted on 08/08/2003 12:19:39 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
"[T]he defendants sold allegedly obscene material over the Internet and distributed videotapes and DVDs across state lines through the postal system, a violation of federal law."

If they had shipped them by UPS or FedEx would any laws have been broken? If no, then they should have used those services.

And further, what an absolute waste of tax payers money, and limited law enforcement resources this is. Leave them alone.

4 posted on 08/08/2003 12:19:45 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
Mostly I think, though, doesn't his office have better things...

You can sum Ashcroft's priorities up in two words: Dopers and Boners.

5 posted on 08/08/2003 12:20:10 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Perhaps you would prefer these laws be repealed so porno junk mail will fill you mailbox at home the way porno spam fills email inboxes.

Ah, they won't be sending you unsolicited porno tapes. And if they wanted to send you junk mail promoting their services, as long as the mail didn't contain the offending images they could do so. Since they are not, it is clear that doing so is not a beneficial marketing strategy and you have no need to worry about your mailbox being stuffed with said items.

6 posted on 08/08/2003 12:21:21 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Ashcroft is the only member of the Bush admin that I agree with the wacko left on much of the time.
7 posted on 08/08/2003 12:22:20 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
Mostly I think, though, doesn't his office have better things to do than fight a losing battle against fringe (adult) porn makers and distributors? This all sounds retarded........


I agree. Legalize hard core, legalize heroin, methedrine and crack. Why bother prosecuting. Yipee!!!
8 posted on 08/08/2003 12:22:42 PM PDT by dennisw (G_d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
And the people who think we have no claim on the Public Square as Dopes and Boneheads. V's wife.
9 posted on 08/08/2003 12:23:02 PM PDT by ventana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
I am a pretty uptight conservative but shouldn't we be tracking down alqueda terrorists instead of these (sick) people?
10 posted on 08/08/2003 12:23:19 PM PDT by fortaydoos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Ah, they won't be sending you unsolicited porno tapes.

What makes you think that? Unless the law is enforced, why wouldn't porno producers send out free samples on CD-ROMs or DVDs the way AOL sends out AOL 8.0 CDs?

11 posted on 08/08/2003 12:24:19 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ventana
You wanna throw a verb in there and form a sentence?
12 posted on 08/08/2003 12:24:38 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
You can sum Ashcroft's priorities up in two words: Dopers and Boners.

Hey, it's OK to sell pardons to criminals, or nuclear secrets to the Chinese !

Ashcroft is an utter ass.

13 posted on 08/08/2003 12:26:11 PM PDT by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
I appreciate having an AG who enforces the law of the land...for a change.
14 posted on 08/08/2003 12:26:14 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
We've got illegals crawling all over this country thanks to businesses that pay them under the table and he's worried about porn.

Just beautiful.
15 posted on 08/08/2003 12:26:36 PM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
There is no moral equivalence between making millions off filth and growing a plant in your closet for recreation or pain relief.

Just my two cents.
16 posted on 08/08/2003 12:27:32 PM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
Well you know, some people don't sleep very well knowing that somewhere, somehow, somebody is having it off.
17 posted on 08/08/2003 12:27:36 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie; ventana
You wanna throw a verb in there and form a sentence?

There's already enough verbiage on Free Republic.

18 posted on 08/08/2003 12:27:47 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Desmond

19 posted on 08/08/2003 12:28:15 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (When news breaks, we fix it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
What makes you think that? Unless the law is enforced, why wouldn't porno producers send out free samples on CD-ROMs or DVDs the way AOL sends out AOL 8.0 CDs?

If it was an effective marketing tool, they would already be doing so.

And it is not illegal to send all prono through the mail. If it was, how would Playboy, Hustler, Penthouse, and the Adam & Eve style catalog companies get their product to customers? Last I checked, they use the USPS.

20 posted on 08/08/2003 12:29:03 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
Just like Ed Meese's "war" on pornography, this is a complete waste of time, money, and effort. How 'bout we use some of that time, money, and effort on our southern border?
21 posted on 08/08/2003 12:29:16 PM PDT by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
"Perhaps you would prefer these laws be repealed so porno junk mail will fill you mailbox at home the way porno spam fills email inboxes."

The article doesn't say whether the videotapes and DVDs are unsolicited or if they were sold. No, I don't want them sending me unsolicited material a la AOL. However, I should be able to buy a DVD from another state.

Does anyone definitively know what the federal law states?

22 posted on 08/08/2003 12:31:36 PM PDT by Desmond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
That's nice, but judging one as "filth" that requires prosecution concedes the playing field and allows prosecution for the other.
23 posted on 08/08/2003 12:32:04 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
Libertine Librarian Liberal Libertarian ?
24 posted on 08/08/2003 12:32:18 PM PDT by verity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
We're facing terrorism the likes of which has never been seen before and this a**wipe Ashcroft and this a**wipe government of ours is spending time and money on stopping porno films.

Your tax dollars at work and your personal safety being disregarded.

25 posted on 08/08/2003 12:32:20 PM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
"The Sopranos" (and other movies/TV) have featured fictional rapes, not to mention murders. Will Ashcroft go after them?

And - since "community standards" is one of the considerations in determining whether something is obscene or not - who's community standards are we talking about? Where the product was mailed from or where it was mailed to?

26 posted on 08/08/2003 12:35:52 PM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Hardcore porn is legal already.

This doesn't make any damn sense. There are thousands of video stores renting and selling hardcore porn tapes all over the US at any moment. Are they all illegal? Thousands of tapes are shipped via USPS every day. If he's prosecuting people on the grounds of the tapes being "obscene", then he'll have to have a jury watch every tape ever made to determine whether or not it is obscene. Good grief.

27 posted on 08/08/2003 12:36:55 PM PDT by TheBigB (Viking Kitties Attak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
And the reverse, my point, of reducing the exchange of every consumer product on the market to the same moral equivalencey is patently silly.

28 posted on 08/08/2003 12:38:38 PM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
Will Ashcroft be raiding Clarence Thomas' collection?
29 posted on 08/08/2003 12:39:03 PM PDT by gdani
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
I can't understand why the exchange of consumer goods would have any moral aspect at all.
30 posted on 08/08/2003 12:40:36 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
It speaks to the degree of evil in using resources to prevent the exchange.
31 posted on 08/08/2003 12:43:02 PM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Yeah, I hate when my original artistic vision is blurred...like filming through Vaseline.
32 posted on 08/08/2003 12:44:03 PM PDT by steve8714
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Exactly, god forbid.
33 posted on 08/08/2003 12:44:41 PM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
But then all you do is set yourself up for the next group's pet peeve, and their use of prosecutorial powers to try to stop it.
34 posted on 08/08/2003 12:44:55 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: fortaydoos
I am a pretty uptight conservative but shouldn't we be tracking down alqueda terrorists instead of these (sick) people?

Nope, we should arrest, prosecute and exile them to Saudi Arabia.

35 posted on 08/08/2003 12:46:04 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: steve8714
Yeah, I hate when my original artistic vision is blurred...like filming through Vaseline.

Look, its your responsibility to make sure the props don't foul the equipment.

36 posted on 08/08/2003 12:46:37 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Slippery slope arguments are the Achilles heal of left-libertarians.


Let me ask the reverse, can a local entity (city or town) zone out the existence of a porn shop or porn production?
37 posted on 08/08/2003 12:47:24 PM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: squidly
How 'bout we use some of that time, money, and effort on our southern border?

You mean stop the influx of illegal aliens and terrorists? Heck no. That wasn't an airliner that crashed into the WTC, it was a giant penis.

38 posted on 08/08/2003 12:48:49 PM PDT by FreedomAvatar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Slippery slope? You mean a 1% income tax didn't turned into a trillion dollar wealth redistribution scheme? That the Miller decision, NFA of '34, and the CGA of '68 didn't set the stage for Brady?

Remove your head from the warm smelly place and take a look around.

39 posted on 08/08/2003 12:50:54 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
My 80 year-old grandmother still gets strip-searched by airport security while Achmed and Ibrahim walk by unaccosted, and Asscroft is spending his time going after porn???
40 posted on 08/08/2003 12:51:14 PM PDT by The Green Goblin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Yes. But they can also zone out the existence of daycare centers too.
41 posted on 08/08/2003 12:52:01 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Let me ask the reverse, can a local entity (city or town) zone out the existence of a porn shop or porn production?

Clearly local entities should be allowed to zone for commercial businesses as they see fit. If the citizens of the locality disagree they can vote with their feet, and vote out those who implemented the laws they dislike.

But, should a locality be allowed to determine what can and can not be delivered by the US Postal Service to residents of the town? No.

42 posted on 08/08/2003 12:53:20 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
I don't mean to defend the porno producers, but this does seem to be a waste of time, given the way the Supreme Court has applied the First Amendment in obscenity cases.
43 posted on 08/08/2003 12:56:38 PM PDT by colorado tanker (Iron Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
After reading the article, it looks like it all comes down to the Feds and the same interstate commerce nonsense they use when they want to prosecute someone for selling guns/gun parts they don't like across state lines.
44 posted on 08/08/2003 12:56:39 PM PDT by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
Its about time the mob, who runs the porn industry, began feeling some serious heat from the feds. I agree with Mike Savage, that John Ashcroft is one of the best AG's ever. He also has a great reward waiting for him when he stands before Christ on Judgement Day.
45 posted on 08/08/2003 12:57:28 PM PDT by Russell Scott (When Christ's Kingdom appears, all of man's problems will disappear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Desmond
this is silly.
46 posted on 08/08/2003 12:57:56 PM PDT by King Prout (people hear and do not listen, see and do not observe, speak without thought, post and not edit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Linking the income tax creep to the permisibility of selling porn tapes is a leap in logic since the rise of porns presence in the American economy grew hand in hand with the rise of government.

Making that link has served big government liberals well.

Why would do you think this would be?

I will stipulate, so we are clear, I agree that this is a waste of limited resource (prosecuting these folks.)

47 posted on 08/08/2003 12:58:11 PM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: sakic
We're facing terrorism the likes of which has never been seen before and this a**wipe Ashcroft and this a**wipe government of ours is spending time and money on stopping porno films.

Geez, half the people whine and moan when Ashcroft uses the Patriot Act to protect the country from terrorism and the other half whine and moan when he does anything BUT terrorism.

If you don't like the law, blame the legislators. The AG can and should enforce the law, and not look the other way whenever he feels like it, especially when people illegally use the US mail to degrade society.

48 posted on 08/08/2003 12:58:12 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (Bumper sticker: "Keep honking -- I'm reloading")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Hold on, I don't want to get too far off track.

I am suggesting that selling porn is not the moral equivalent of selling/growing a plant and I think its foolish to make the connection.

You certainly lean right-libertarian with respect to local entities. However, why can't a community restrict what passes through the United States mail into their town? What is preventing them from doing it?

49 posted on 08/08/2003 1:02:12 PM PDT by JohnGalt (They're All Lying)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
We've got illegals crawling all over this country thanks to businesses that pay them under the table and he's worried about porn.

I know it's different agencies and all, but they are all under the DHS - throw these reources towards doing something about the border problems or tracking down terrorists in the middle east, etc.

I'm not too worried about the Ron Jeremys of the world - I'm more worried about the people crossing our borders illegaly.

50 posted on 08/08/2003 1:02:50 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-216 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson