Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fashion Emergency: How to FixThe Downside of Low-Rise Pants
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL ^ | Friday, July 25, 2003 | SUEIN L. HWANG

Posted on 07/25/2003 1:18:40 PM PDT by presidio9

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:49:30 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Los Angeles wardrobe stylist Jeanne Yang calls in a tailor to put in darts at the hip. Advertising executive Paula Mangin of San Francisco is choosy about the chairs she sits in and, when she stoops, she takes care to bend at the knees. Web publicist Karen Bard, also of San Francisco, leans on her boyfriend.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 07/25/2003 1:18:41 PM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Expose as much flesh as you can get away with to attract the boys. Its been around for quite awhile and not just with low rise jeans either.
2 posted on 07/25/2003 1:21:44 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I just keep thinking of Dan Ackroyd.....
3 posted on 07/25/2003 1:26:25 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Why is it women feel that they have to go along with whatever trend comes down the runway? Some guys go for the XXXXX-baggy jeans look, but they are in the minority (at least where I live).
4 posted on 07/25/2003 1:26:44 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

5 posted on 07/25/2003 1:27:15 PM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
This year's fashion phenomenon, T-shirt maker C&C California, is selling tank tops with 18 inches of fabric from the armhole to the bottom of the shirt, compared with just 11 inches for regular T-shirts. Says co-owner Claire Stansfield: "We filled that gap." The startup company has a waiting list for its cover-up tank top.

I'm no genius, but isn't this defeating the whole purpose? Why not just buy normal jeans?

6 posted on 07/25/2003 1:28:35 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catspaw
"I see you've got an old Norge there..."
7 posted on 07/25/2003 1:28:48 PM PDT by presidio9 (RUN AL, RUN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Now these are low.......


8 posted on 07/25/2003 1:29:20 PM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Some do, not all. I tried on a pair of those things just for giggles. Couldn't see what the fuss was about. But then I like my clothes loose and my skirts long. Why buy this stuff if you have to watch what you're doing every minute? Seems to me folks will remember what you accidently bared a lot longer than how good you may have looked.
9 posted on 07/25/2003 1:30:08 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Boy, have you tried finding normal jeans lately? Well, probably not for women :) It ain't easy.
10 posted on 07/25/2003 1:32:15 PM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
And while that might be just the ticket for some, it's a problem in need of a solution to women with even a modicum of modesty.

Here's a wild solution to this terrible problem, wear something that doesn't cause the problem.

"It's just a way of life now," she says. "If you want to be fashionable, you've got to practice socially responsible bending."

Two sentences that should never go together.

11 posted on 07/25/2003 1:32:50 PM PDT by Fzob (Why does this tag line keep showing up?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
If you aren't very careful, you end up showing too much.

You can't show too much unless you have too much.

So9

12 posted on 07/25/2003 1:34:31 PM PDT by Servant of the Nine (A Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9


13 posted on 07/25/2003 1:35:17 PM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
I'm probably in the minority, but I don't think that those low-riders look attractive on women, no matter how hot the woman. They seem to make the butt and hips look bigger. I like the normal, but not baggy, jeans on women. They are more complimentary to the woman's figure. I also hate the big clunky shoes on women. Women don't look good in Herman Munster shoes.
14 posted on 07/25/2003 1:35:22 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
As any woman who has purchased them can attest, they come with one little drawback: If you aren't very careful, you end up showing too much. And while that might be just the ticket for some, it's a problem in need of a solution to women with even a modicum of modesty.

Will I be flamed if I suggest that women who are modest wouldn't buy clothes which force them to be very careful lest they be exposed?

15 posted on 07/25/2003 1:36:20 PM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
I'm still trying to figure out the jeans that look as if they were dragged through a septic tank. I had acid washed jeans back in the 80s, but wearing nasty-looking jeans is not for me.
16 posted on 07/25/2003 1:37:04 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
When I was in college and grad school in the '60s, low-rise pants (known as hiphuggers) were quite in fashion. I don't remember it as a problem, and many of the girls weren't wearing any underwear anyway. The more obscene fashion was hot pants, which combinted a very low rise with a very short short. One girlfriend of mine had a pair that were somewhere around 5-6" total height, from the hem of the shorts to the top of the 'waist'band. Not nearly as revealing as her string bikini, but rather risque for anywhere respectable.
17 posted on 07/25/2003 1:37:42 PM PDT by CatoRenasci (Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Now these are low.......

And laughably airbrushed. Where's her navel?!

18 posted on 07/25/2003 1:38:22 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
When I was in school, you would have been teased for days if the tag on your underwear showed. Nowadays, guys who wear baggy jeans have to practically put their lower back on a bus seat to prevent pantsing themselves, and every other young woman displays the waistband of her panties if she bends down or kneels.

Here's what's more alarming IMHO -- teen girls with tattoos on the small of their backs barely above their cracks! Those aren't there for their own enjoyment, are they?

19 posted on 07/25/2003 1:38:30 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Dan Akroid, comedic genius.
20 posted on 07/25/2003 1:38:34 PM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson