Skip to comments.
Bush Speech in Africa Boosts "Reparations Movement"
Newsmax.com ^
| 07-10-03
| Not given
Posted on 07/10/2003 8:03:44 AM PDT by Theodore R.
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Even Bill Clinton backed off on making a P.C. "apology" after a storm of protest shot down the idea.
As I recall, B.C. did "apologize" for slavery and was equally warm to the idea of "reparations" for descendants of slaves.
Didn't the president run as an opponent of "reparations" to descendants of slaves? Governor Perry did, but Democrat Tony Sanchez merely said that he would "study" the question of reparations were he to have been elected.
To: All
2
posted on
07/10/2003 8:05:53 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Theodore R.
So this is our conservative President from Texas huh. Sheesh!
3
posted on
07/10/2003 8:06:02 AM PDT
by
Joe Hadenuf
(RECALL DAVIS, position his smoking chair over a trapdoor, a memo for the next governor.)
To: Theodore R.
It was stated beautifully on a thread yesterday. Bottom line...some of those of African ancestory want reparations to account for all they've suffered. Fine, if they feel that way...but no reparations without repatriotation to the lands of their ancestors and revoking US citizenship.
4
posted on
07/10/2003 8:07:14 AM PDT
by
grania
("Won't get fooled again")
To: Theodore R.
Maybe the repriations folks should have to pay for the priviliges they've come to know or take their money and be forced to return to their origins....
5
posted on
07/10/2003 8:07:43 AM PDT
by
Jumper
To: Theodore R.
NEWSMAX might want to edit the title so they don't look so stupid.
Bush was never in and never gave a speech in Liberia
6
posted on
07/10/2003 8:08:09 AM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: MJY1288
The error is mine. It should be "Africa," not "Liberia" in the headline. Newsmax.com is not at fault.
To: Theodore R.
OOPS, let me restate that,
Hello Theodore R. I think you might have made a mistake in the title. Don't sweat it it happens to all of us :-)
8
posted on
07/10/2003 8:15:50 AM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: grania
Nobody alive has been a slave in the United States or had a parent who was a slave in the United States. Thus, no one has standing with which to claim reparations. In addition, there is no one alive who 'owned' a slave in the United States. Thus, there is no one who can legally be sued.
9
posted on
07/10/2003 8:16:43 AM PDT
by
thoughtomator
(Abort, Retry, Ignore, Fail?)
To: Theodore R.
As I recall, B.C. did "apologize" for slavery and was equally warm to the idea of "reparations" for descendants of slaves.
It appears that you are correct.
(From Thomas Sowell)
Owl_Eagle
Guns Before Butter.
10
posted on
07/10/2003 8:19:52 AM PDT
by
End Times Sentinel
("Europeans lost the will to live the moral life long ago." - Ben Shapiro)
To: Theodore R.
NewsMax gives way to hyperbole too often to be taken seriously. Their spin is destroying their credibility....what little they have, that is.
11
posted on
07/10/2003 8:22:14 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
((BUSH/CHENEY 2004))
To: MJY1288; Theodore R.
Hello Theodore R. I think you might have made a mistake in the title. Don't sweat it it happens to all of us :-)
Naw...... only to those that feel a need to rewrite the orginal title provide by the author.....
Posted here with additional comments if'n anyone is interested in them.....
12
posted on
07/10/2003 8:22:57 AM PDT
by
deport
(On a hot day don't kick a cow chip...... only democrat enablers..)
To: grania
'but no reparations without repatriotation to the lands of their ancestors and revoking US citizenship'
Much like many other 'oppressed' groups, they don't want to take the bad with the good. This is the only condition on which I would give my support to such a movement.
13
posted on
07/10/2003 8:26:18 AM PDT
by
bk1000
To: Joe Hadenuf
I'd say this is a journalist's "spin" on W's trip. There's not a lot of hard news coming out of this visit, so in the world of scribbling profession, this is known as a "second day, PM lead," on yesterday's story.
To: Theodore R.
"If we are recognizing this as one of the greatest crimes in history, there had to be criminals," Fields said. Very true. But what Jesse, Inc. will never admit is that those criminals were black Africans themselves. And their descendants have no money to pay reparations.
To: Owl_Eagle
Maybe we fabulously-weathy-from-slavery white folks ought to give them the "40 acres and a mule" originally promised. (note: numbers of mules/acres based on numbers of slaves in 1865.)
16
posted on
07/10/2003 8:32:00 AM PDT
by
tbpiper
To: Theodore R.
Unless the president makes taxpayers cough up millions or billions, according to Booker, "Bush is almost making light of the severity of slavery. Absolutely not true. Pres. Bush acknowledged the realities of past slavery, but the thrust of the speech was forward, future. The input of Africans on American shores continues to help our country as a whole become a land of justice and freedom for all. He ended with the words: "This untamed fire of justice continues to burn in the affairs of man, and it lights the way before us."
The irony here is that modern reparation-seekers are doing exactly what slave owners did in the past--profit from the toils of working men and women.
17
posted on
07/10/2003 8:38:47 AM PDT
by
twigs
To: twigs
I think you're on to something.
To: twigs
I agree, modern reparations seekers are only looking for a free ride on someone else's back, much as slaveholders of old did.
"Whether it's called reparations or reconstruction assistance, something is needed in order to return peoples to their own history.
Money taken from workers today cannot "return peoples to their own history". People make their own history. What's done in the distant past is done, and we can only move forward. I would ask the reparations seekers, what do you want to be remembered for? As someone who delayed the progress of black advancement by convincing blacks that they must live on the dole, that somehow a lottery check from uncle Sam will make everything all right? Or as someone who made their own destiny and rose above the injustices of the past to enjoy true equality and the rewards of accomplishment? I think I know what Jesse Jackson and the folks in the article above have chosen.
And that's not even getting into the mega-quagmire question of who pays, and who receives?
19
posted on
07/10/2003 9:33:08 AM PDT
by
Sender
To: Theodore R.
"If we are recognizing this as one of the greatest crimes in history, there had to be criminals," Fields said. Yes, and they are all dead.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson