[Hunble]

Again, were is the raw data.

For example, what is the CO2 vs O2 ratio? Plants convert CO2 into O2, and if things are in balance, that ratio would remain the same.

If humans are influencing the environment faster than the biomass can process, then the CO2 vs O2 ratio will change.

[FreeTheHostages]

"For example, what is the CO2 vs O2 ratio? Plants convert CO2 into O2, and if things are in balance, that ratio would remain the same.

If humans are influencing the environment faster than the biomass can process, then the CO2 vs O2 ratio will change."

Yup. I totally agree. And that's one reason why the climate change isn't necessarily a bad thing. And the predictive models tell us nothing -- they really don't know how much of a vegetation CO2 sink there is. I'm not saying climate change is bad: that's the left, politicizing science, that says that. I'm saying the science indicates that manmade climate change is occuring. let's not us on the right politicize science too: I worry very much that many here are afraid to confront that science because they think that if it's true, they have to rush out and sign Kyoto. Balderdash