Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justices Void Prison Term Given Gay Teenager in Kansas
New York Times ^ | June 27, 2003 | DAVID STOUT

Posted on 06/27/2003 12:59:10 PM PDT by Stingray51

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-314 next last
To: Stingray51
Didnt the SCOTUS rule that same sex sexual harassment wasnt really sexual harassment not too many years ago? I swore that I read this somewhere, and that the female justices were the only ones who dissented. This would seem very hypocritical, coming from the same SCOTUS. I could be wrong tho, does anyone else remember this? Just wondering...JFK
21 posted on 06/27/2003 1:25:35 PM PDT by BADROTOFINGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Don't make too much of this. All they are going to do is revisit the sentence. The kid will not go unpunished. THe punishment will simply be set in line with other similar consensual acts regardless of the gender of the participants. This actually makes sense.
22 posted on 06/27/2003 1:26:32 PM PDT by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
"Ignore MineralMan. He *says* he's married from somewhere near SF and is profaggot. "

I am married and I am from a town near SF. I'm not "Profaggot" whatever that means. I'm against 17 year sentences for 18-year-olds who engage in that activity. It's excessive.

Now, go back to your gay chat rooms.
23 posted on 06/27/2003 1:27:05 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
At least in prison he wouldn't have been preying on 14 year olds.
24 posted on 06/27/2003 1:27:07 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Stingray51
"Matthew Limon was one week past his 18th birthday in early 2000 when he performed oral sex on a 14-year-old boy at the center for developmentally disabled young people where they both lived. No violence or coercion was involved."

Separately, the 6 month old girl penetrated by the babysitter with a broom handle was similarly set free. "No violence or coercion was involved."

25 posted on 06/27/2003 1:27:44 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Racism is the codified policy of the USA .... - The Supremes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold
"OK, by some definitions Fresno is 'near' SF. So is the Freeper staff now in danger of being called 'profaggot' "

And they probably claim to be "married" too. The horror.
26 posted on 06/27/2003 1:27:59 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Actually, if the culprit had been 17 there wouldnt have been a crime. By being one week past 18 this became statutory rape.
27 posted on 06/27/2003 1:28:23 PM PDT by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
You know, you seem to be the one obsessed.

Polk Street? Your kind of area? Lots of married men visit there.
28 posted on 06/27/2003 1:28:44 PM PDT by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
"Polk Street? Your kind of area? Lots of married men visit there."

Your insinuations are specious, offensive, and unwarranted.
29 posted on 06/27/2003 1:29:37 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
The homosexual agenda has been pushing for a norming of the age of consent laws (more vocally in England than in America). I said this as soon as the Supreme Court took the case. I was told by some troll defenders that I was throwing out a strawman argument.

Incrementalism is the liberal way.

I've always said that this will not end with "consenting adults". Adults and minors (who have reached age of consent or are near the age of consent...) will be engaging in homosexual sodomy.

30 posted on 06/27/2003 1:30:04 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
So are yours.

31 posted on 06/27/2003 1:30:06 PM PDT by I_Love_My_Husband
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Uh, no they didn't. Don't let your overactive imagination get carried away.
32 posted on 06/27/2003 1:30:28 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Ping
33 posted on 06/27/2003 1:30:59 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BADROTOFINGER
Actually, I believe the SCOTUS ruled that same sex sexual harassment was really sexual harassment...
34 posted on 06/27/2003 1:31:59 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BlueNgold
THe punishment will simply be set in line with other similar consensual acts regardless of the gender of the participants.

Treating homosexuals as equal before the law? Don't you see? It's The End Of The World As We Know It! It's terrible! If you don't agree that it's terrible, then you must be one of them evil queers! (/sarcasm)

35 posted on 06/27/2003 1:32:50 PM PDT by Chemist_Geek ("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Stingray51
This sh!t is really getting out of hand.

I'm not aware of a single 2nd amendment conviction that those fools in black have overturned, yet they have no problems vacating the conviction of some perverted fudgepacker preying on young children.

Unfreaking believable.

36 posted on 06/27/2003 1:33:02 PM PDT by Mulder (Live Free or die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: BlueNgold
Let's eliminate age of consent laws altogether. They are not uniform from state to state and nothing magically changes from 17 years 363 days to 18 years.

Let's do away with the drinking age too. A 20 year old is violating the law but on his 21st birthday he can get hammered.

The koran specifies that brides don't even need to have reached the age of puberty. There is also no prohibition on sex with one's wife regardless of age.

38 posted on 06/27/2003 1:35:08 PM PDT by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
The reason I ask was that I seem to remember that the vote went down along gender lines, and I found myself agreeing with the women, who were the dissenters and ultimately, losers. Any idea on how I could find this information? Any help would be appreciated...JFK
39 posted on 06/27/2003 1:35:34 PM PDT by BADROTOFINGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: weegee
Adults and minors (who have reached age of consent or are near the age of consent...) will be engaging in homosexual sodomy.

Just a guess ... but I think this is probably happening almost every day in almost every community in America regardless of this decision.

40 posted on 06/27/2003 1:35:56 PM PDT by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 301-314 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson