Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Shermy
For sure the NYT reporter spiced up the story and put specific knowledge into "witnesses" minds they didn't have.

First of all, remember that a key Timesman here is A. M. Rosenthal, who was the most conservative Times columnist in memory, including Bill Safire. In fact, wasn't Rosenthal fired, about 10-15 years ago, for being too conservative?

Second, the New York Times did not make up the idea that people should have called the police and did not. The Times was just writing up the outrage of the police detectives.

Was the story exaggerated? Yes. Did it have mistakes? Yes, daily papers have no fact checkers and are full of mistakes. But the story was not completely wrong in spirit. There were members of the public who should have called the police but did not because they feared embarrassment should there be no real problem. Also, most likely, several citizens did not call the police because they hoped someone else was -- bad decision, since it appears that it sometimes took several calls to the police to consider a situation high priority.

Bottom line. If my wife or I suspect trouble, we call the police. If the original outrage of the New York detectives, and the Times story, contributed to others being the same, a service was rendered, albeit in a sloppy way.

5 posted on 05/28/2003 6:16:31 PM PDT by Steve Eisenberg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Steve Eisenberg
I still prefer not being lied to, regardless of the motive.
14 posted on 05/28/2003 7:49:59 PM PDT by Imal (There's a Marxist born every minute)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson