Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Belgian Prosecutor May Send Franks Case to U.S.
Reuters ^ | May 16 2003

Posted on 05/16/2003 10:47:17 AM PDT by knighthawk

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - A Brussels prosecutor will probably pass a war crimes lawsuit against General Tommy Franks, commander of U.S. forces in Iraq, on to the United States, a judicial official said on Friday.

An official decision on the case -- filed under Belgium's controversial law enabling its courts to try foreigners for human rights abuses -- is expected next week.

"The option we prefer is to send the case to the international tribunal (International Criminal Court) in The Hague but the Americans don't accept its jurisdiction," said Lieve Pellens, spokeswoman for the federal prosecutor's office.

"The judicial system in Iraq is excluded right now, so an American court seems to be the best option," she told Reuters.

U.S. embassy officials declined to comment.

A legal decision to pass the suit on to the United States would help heal Belgium's relations with Washington, damaged by Belgium's opposition to the U.S.-led war in Iraq and its obstruction of NATO's pre-war efforts to boost Turkish defenses.

"The law is clear: if the country of the perpetrator has a legal system that offers a guarantee to handle the complaint properly then we can forward the file," Prime Minister Guy Verhofstadt was quoted as saying in Het Nieuwsblad newspaper.

"You can hardly claim that the U.S. does not have a balanced judicial system," he added.

A group of 19 Iraqis filed the complaint against Franks and a U.S. Marine colonel on Wednesday, over the use of cluster bombs and alleged U.S. attacks on ambulances and civilians.

Belgium's law has prompted a flood of cases against figures like Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, and was recently revamped in an attempt to deter what critics say are politically motivated cases.

Pellens said a welter of similar lawsuits, against figures including Secretary of State Colin Powell and former U.S. President George Bush, had clogged up the judiciary.

"We notice that some of our best investigating magistrates do only these cases and nothing else. It's using up a lot of our capacities," she added.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: belgian; belgium; franks; iraq; tommyfranks; warcrimes

1 posted on 05/16/2003 10:47:17 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; Squantos; ...
Ping
2 posted on 05/16/2003 10:47:32 AM PDT by knighthawk (Full of power I'm spreading my wings, facing the storm that is gathering near)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
The law is clear: if the country of the perpetrator has a legal system that offers a guarantee to handle the complaint properly then we can forward the file

Oh, we've got the means to handle this complaint properly, all right:


3 posted on 05/16/2003 10:50:51 AM PDT by dirtboy (someone kidnapped dirtboy and replaced him with an exact replica)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
When we conservative neanderthals voiced our opposition to the International Criminal Court on the basis that someone exactly like this could happen, we were roundly mocked and ridiculed. It didn't take very long for some whacko in Belgium to prove that, once again, we were right.
4 posted on 05/16/2003 10:51:35 AM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpl
something, not "someone".
5 posted on 05/16/2003 10:52:03 AM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Hmmm, I guess Belgium looked at what happened to French exports and decided they had better export this suit immediately.
6 posted on 05/16/2003 10:55:40 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
U.S. embassy officials declined to comment.

That must have taken an enormous amount of self-control. When the Belgians get their own house in order, then they can lecture to others.

7 posted on 05/16/2003 11:02:56 AM PDT by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Where were the Belgians when Saddam killed a quarter million Iraqis?

Had they served him with an indictment, perhaps he would have changed his course, do you suppose? Does that mean that the failure to properly indict and prosecute Saddam puts the blame for genocide squarely on Belgium's broad shoulders?

Just thinking about sending someone to serve the arrest warrant reminds me of the old "bell and the cat" story. All the mice agree that they would be safer if they hung a bell on the cat, so they could hear him coming. But then the old mouse raises the question: Fine, we know now what to do. Now, who is going to hang the bell on the cat?

The answer is that it would never be a Belgian. If you want to hang a bell on a cat, you send someone like Tommy Franks. And step back out of the way, and "forward the file" to the nearest wastepaper basket. There are jobs in the world that require adult attention, teenagers need not apply.
8 posted on 05/16/2003 11:09:22 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Tell the Belgians to print the war crime lawsuit on soft, two ply paper and ship it on 4 1/2 inch rolls to the US Army in Iraq. Thanks !
9 posted on 05/16/2003 11:20:23 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
If Belguim can try non-Belgians for alleged crimes committed by foreigners outside their country, why can't the United States tax foreigners living abroad?

10 posted on 05/16/2003 11:21:14 AM PDT by Grand Old Partisan (You can read about my history of the GOP at www.republicanbasics.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
A legal decision to pass the suit on to the United States would help heal Belgium's relations with Washington

Not a snow balls chance will that happen.

11 posted on 05/16/2003 11:25:09 AM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpl
It wasn't even a whacko. This is their law, approved by their legislature and enforced by prosecutors and courts.

We need somebody to file a complaint in Belgium against Jacques Chiraq for his multiple violations of the law as President. It can't be claimed France has a functioning legal system, since they exempt the President from prosecution. Let's see how France reacts when reactor-boy gets charges files against him in Brussels.

That will end this "law" very quickly! France has a horrible record at winning wars, but even they wouldn't have any trouble with the Belgians.
12 posted on 05/16/2003 11:39:27 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Maybe we can sanction the lawyer who filed it. How does a stint in Guantanamo sound?
13 posted on 05/16/2003 11:55:33 AM PDT by Defiant (Bush as philosopher: "I-raq, therefore I-ran.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
A legal decision to pass the suit on to the United States would help heal Belgium's relations with Washington.

The only thing that would help relations with Washington in regard to this nonsense would be to drop the whole hypocritical pretence that Belgium has any right to try people for crimes committed outside its jurisdiction.

If the U.S. courts even pretend to take this case in order to drop it they deserve criticism. We should not spend a dime of taxpayer money on this nonsense.

Meantime, Belgium has much else to answer for. They are as treacherous as the French.

14 posted on 05/16/2003 12:43:30 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpl
When we conservative neanderthals voiced our opposition to the International Criminal Court on the basis that someone exactly like this could happen, we were roundly mocked and ridiculed. It didn't take very long for some whacko in Belgium to prove that, once again, we were right.

Bump.

15 posted on 05/16/2003 12:48:37 PM PDT by DoctorMichael (........wah,wah,wah, oooooooooooooooo.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jpl
Who on the Right supported the ICC??
16 posted on 05/16/2003 12:52:00 PM PDT by Guillermo (Sic 'Em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
You don't think the left would use this to put the screws to the President? It sounds like the international left is gearing up for another shot at the Pres.

I don't see how they believe he'd be tried in a fed. court, however. Doesn't military try their own?

17 posted on 05/16/2003 1:00:48 PM PDT by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
Who on the Right supported the ICC??

Nobody that I am aware of. The leftists were the ones that were trying to claim that we were paranoid and nothing like this would ever happen.

18 posted on 05/16/2003 1:11:58 PM PDT by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
About half of Belgium speaks French, and behave like French too!
19 posted on 05/17/2003 6:10:20 AM PDT by knighthawk (Full of power I'm spreading my wings, facing the storm that is gathering near)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson