Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AOL-TW Execs Accused of Insider Trading (Turner,Case,Parsons,Levin, Pittman named)
Reuters ^ | Mon April 14, 2003 | Derek Caney

Posted on 04/14/2003 9:10:57 AM PDT by Liz

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Two institutional shareholders said on Monday they filed suit against AOL Time Warner Inc. AOL.N , accusing Chairman Steve Case and other top executives of insider trading while using "tricks, contrivances and bogus transactions" to inflate the company's share price.

The University of California, which said it lost $450 million in its investment in the world's largest media company, and Amalgamated Bank's Longview Collective Investment Fund said in a statement they filed the suit in California state Superior Court in Los Angeles.

In addition to AOL Time Warner and Case, the lawsuit also names as defendants Vice Chairman Ted Turner, Chief Executive Officer Richard Parsons, former CEO Gerald Levin, and former Chief Operating Officer Bob Pittman.

The complaint alleges that the defendants reaped nearly $1 billion by selling shares while using "tricks, contrivances and bogus transactions" to inflate the company's shares, according to a statement issued by Milberg Weiss, the law firm representing the university and the bank.

Case, who had been sharply criticized by shareholders who were disappointed with the performance of AOL Time Warner, said in January he would resign in May so he would not become a distraction to the company.

Turner, the largest single shareholder of AOL Time Warner, is due to resign as vice chairman in May.

The suit claims that America Online's earnings from 2000 to 2001 were overstated by almost $1 billion, that it overstated subscribers to its Internet service, and that it inflated its e-commerce and advertising revenue to help secure its acquisition of Time Warner.

Executives at the company, purveyors of everything from Bugs Bunny to Madonna to Time Magazine, declined to comment.

AOL Time Warner shares have lost two-thirds of their value since the merger closed in January 2001, from the poor performance of its America Online Internet division and the cloud government investigations into its accounting.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission believes the company improperly booked some of the about $400 million in advertising revenue it recognized as part of deals with Bertelsmann AG BERT.UL , AOL Time Warner disclosed last month in its annual report.

The company said at the time that it stood by its treatment of the deals.

In October, the company said it would restate results for a two-year period, cutting revenue by $190 million.

The suit also named the company's auditor, Ernst & Young. Executives from the accounting firm were not immediately available for comment.

The University of California and the Longview fund allege that AOL and Time Warner executives took advantage of the firms' January 2001 merger to cash in stock options on an accelerated basis. The merger, they said, triggered early vesting of 35 million stock option shares valued at $1.7 billion for the top five AOL executives alone.

"The University of California made a sound investment in a solid company when it invested heavily in Time Warner prior to its merger with AOL," David Russ, the university's treasurer, said in a statement. "The value of that investment was significantly impaired as a result of the merger."

The University of California said at the time of the merger it owned more than 11.3 million shares of Time Warner worth around $800 million and no shares of America Online. The school said it lost $450 million as a result of the AOL Time Warner deal.

The suit also named the AOL and Time Warner's financial advisers, Morgan Stanley MWD.N and Salomon Smith Barney and its parent, Citigroup Inc. C.N . Morgan Stanley declined to comment.

A Citigroup spokesman said he was familiar with the allegations against Salomon Smith Barney. "We believe the allegations to be without merit," he said.

Milberg Weiss last July filed a shareholder lawsuit in federal court in New York against AOL Time Warner, which named as defendants the company, Case, Parsons, Levin and Michael Kelly, another company executive.

Amalgamated's Longview fund, which frequently makes shareholder proposals on corporate governance issues, filed a motion in September to be lead plaintiff in that suit, which accused AOL Time Warner of illegal accounting practices and alleged that executives artificially inflated the price of the company's stock.

Officials at Amalgamated and at Milberg Weiss were not immediately available to comment on Monday.

As of March 25, AOL Time Warner said that 30 shareholder suits have been filed against it and certain current and former executives. The company has said it intends to defend itself vigorously against these suits.

AOL Time Warner shares rose 14 cents to $12.44 at midday on Monday on the New York Stock Exchange.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption
KEYWORDS: aol; case; civilsuit; insidertrading; levin; parsons; pittman; turner; tw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
The complaint alleges that the defendants reaped nearly $1 billion by selling shares while using "tricks, contrivances and bogus transactions" to inflate the company's shares, according to a statement issued by Milberg Weiss, the law firm representing the (University of California and Amalgamated Bank's Longview Collective Investment Fund).

Not philanthropic Ted Turnip? Please, say it isn't so.

1 posted on 04/14/2003 9:10:57 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
These Guys Don't Want You To Donate!

Tick them off! Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!

2 posted on 04/14/2003 9:13:06 AM PDT by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
The title of this article is sensationalistic (not meant to criticize the poster of the article). The SEC needs to accuse them of insider trading for this to have any criminal implications. Now that would be a big deal, not that this civil suit will be anything other than a major headache.
3 posted on 04/14/2003 9:13:50 AM PDT by PianoMan (Liberate the Axis of Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
I think it's a fairly standard procedure to name top executives in lawsuits of this type. We'll see if TT gets the same treatment that Ken "Enron" Lay got in the press.
4 posted on 04/14/2003 9:14:13 AM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Contribute soon so the Freepathon can be over and we can stop seeing all these puke liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
That's probably why Turner recently moved his residence to Florida where he can keep his house in case of bankruptcy or civil judgements.
5 posted on 04/14/2003 9:15:40 AM PDT by AmusedBystander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
If my portoflio manager put that much of my money in one company I would have his ass in court!
6 posted on 04/14/2003 9:19:35 AM PDT by big bad easter bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Bump
7 posted on 04/14/2003 9:20:04 AM PDT by eureka! (Bless our Troops and Allies and the freed Iraqis and DAMN CNN TO HELL........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Martha and Ted should have Hitlery introduce a bill to get them off the hook, huh. (Like comics are for the kids)
8 posted on 04/14/2003 9:20:55 AM PDT by Uncle George
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
I wouldn't hold my breath. Remember how the Media reacted to Terry McAuliffe's connection to Global Crossings?

-Regards, T.
9 posted on 04/14/2003 9:22:10 AM PDT by T Lady (.Freed From the Dimocratic Shackles since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Well this should be interesting to see the outcome

BTW .. Reuters is very misleading in it's headline
10 posted on 04/14/2003 9:25:54 AM PDT by Mo1 (I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
"You've got lawsuits".

The only executive more terrible than Steve Case is Michael Dell. Dell's F- customer service is a joke. Good product; awful service.

11 posted on 04/14/2003 9:26:00 AM PDT by tuna_battle_slight_return
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
OMG!

Does this mean we'll lose Cartoon Network, Ted?

Say it isnt so!

12 posted on 04/14/2003 9:30:23 AM PDT by Gasshog (eyes open, mouth too! tough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Notice where the suit was filed: California State Supreme Court....
13 posted on 04/14/2003 9:30:24 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
The State of CA will own AOLTW when this is over...

Because CalPers invested and lost a ton of money, municipalities are having to contribute higher percentages of salaries now to the retirement system.

Of course, Warner Bros. employee got the biggest screwjob, since all their bonuses were turned into stock when AOL took over....most have seen their retirements disappear since the pre-AOL days.
14 posted on 04/14/2003 9:35:14 AM PDT by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Liz
"This is a part of the IT gods' strategy to release Mozilla and Netscape from the clutches of AOL."

Joe Bits
Internet Geek
15 posted on 04/14/2003 9:40:53 AM PDT by unspun (The most terrorized place in America is a mother's womb.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmusedBystander
Nice take.
16 posted on 04/14/2003 9:41:17 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl
TW employees saw all their options immediately vest at the merger...and many sold, so your statement isn't quite correct...the guy who should be shot is Levin..because he did the deal WITHOUT a collar......really stupid....bu8t he got his comuppance to an extent..becuase he never sold a share..he lost a fortune..he's close to broke....awww...
17 posted on 04/14/2003 9:41:47 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Liz
I said goodbye to AOHell in 1997 and haven't looked back.

Cheers.

18 posted on 04/14/2003 9:43:57 AM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurbankKarl; Grampa Dave; NormsRevenge; SierraWasp; Ernest_at_the_Beach; fuzzthatwuz
The State of CA will own AOLTW when this is over... Because CalPers invested and lost a ton of money, municipalities are having to contribute higher percentages of salaries now to the retirement system. Of course, Warner Bros. employee got the biggest screwjob, since all their bonuses were turned into stock when AOL took over....most have seen their retirements disappear since the pre-AOL days.

Lookie here. Calpers is really in the news today.

(Burbank Karl, have I got a link for you. See below.)

19 posted on 04/14/2003 9:44:40 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
That is interesting.
20 posted on 04/14/2003 9:45:24 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson