Skip to comments.
BUREAUCRATS STYMIE ARMING OF AIRLINE PILOTS
EMail ^
| 08/18/2003
| EMail
Posted on 02/18/2003 10:34:35 AM PST by LuisBasco
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Let's let congresscritters know how we feel about their abdicating their responsibities and allowing the bureaucrats take command!
1
posted on
02/18/2003 10:34:35 AM PST
by
LuisBasco
To: LuisBasco
Forget contacting Bush, he opposed it in the first place.
2
posted on
02/18/2003 10:42:32 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave)
To: LuisBasco
P.S. When this passed, I said that the buruearacrats would do everything they could to make carrying a gun so difficult and the process so tiresome that few would bother.
And what REALLY pisses me off is that a FREAKING POULTRY INSPECTOR can carry a gun with hardly a signed name required!
3
posted on
02/18/2003 10:45:15 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave)
To: LuisBasco
4
posted on
02/18/2003 10:46:23 AM PST
by
Search4Truth
(2nd Amendment - acknowledges and protects a pre-existing human right.)
To: LuisBasco
It is a sad day for America when there is even an issue about the right of the captain of a ship to arm himself, for his own protection and that of his crew and passengers. Why do we denigrate aircraft pilots in a way that it would have been unthinkable to denigrate the captains of ships?
This is outrageous, any way that you look at it. It is not the sort of thing which makes Americans want to trust the Federal Bureaucracy--nor should it!
William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site
5
posted on
02/18/2003 10:48:47 AM PST
by
Ohioan
To: Blood of Tyrants; *bang_list
I guess poultry inspecors are not subject to chicken Sh*t regulations like the pilots
6
posted on
02/18/2003 10:50:44 AM PST
by
harpseal
(Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: harpseal
Harpseal! we agree on something!
Ravenstar
7
posted on
02/18/2003 11:00:18 AM PST
by
Ravenstar
(Reinstitute the Constitution as the Ultimate Law of the Land)
To: LuisBasco
I am not flying until the following conditions:
1. It's a Boeing.
2. Boeing has qualified US pilot.
3. Pilot has suitable firearm.
4. Firearm is loaded and placed within the reach of the pilot.
I don't think that the "powers that be" have given any consideration to the possibility that a large sector of the public is NOT flying because pilots aren't armed yet.
8
posted on
02/18/2003 11:02:32 AM PST
by
elbucko
(I'd trust a pilot with a gun before I'd trust a lawyer with anything.)
To: LuisBasco
Bush could put a stop to this in a hurry if he wanted to. I'm not inclined to call my Congressman on this again. At this point, the ball is in Bush's court. Those of us who care about this issue should be in touch with the NRA, GOA, etc. to tell them to explain the facts of life to Bush and, probably more importantly, Rove. When they do, I hope they'll point out that any Supreme Court nominations will be viewed with special scrutiny after the way they've handled this.
9
posted on
02/18/2003 11:06:26 AM PST
by
caltrop
To: LuisBasco
Airline pilots score way too high on IQ tests for the government to trust them with a firearm.
10
posted on
02/18/2003 11:15:09 AM PST
by
meadsjn
To: elbucko
Firearm is loaded and placed within the reach of the pilot.This will be at the top of my list!
To: LuisBasco
Signed and sent.
12
posted on
02/18/2003 11:47:22 AM PST
by
TigersEye
(Let the liberals whine -- it's what they do.)
To: meadsjn
Unfortunately I think your right especially considering the fact that many of them are ex-military pilots and so are used to handling firearms in a flight situation.
Ravenstar
13
posted on
02/18/2003 11:49:07 AM PST
by
Ravenstar
(Reinstitute the Constitution as the Ultimate Law of the Land)
To: LuisBasco
The problem with the opposition is they misunderstand what that pilot with a gun is going to do. In the event of a hijacking, the people in the back of the airplane are still on their own. The chance of their being an air marshal on board is slim to none. The armed pilot isn't going to use his weapon until the cockpit is threatened. Right now if the same scenario happens all he has is a crash axe. If we can get at least 15% of the aircrew carrying weapons that will be a much greater deterrant than a few air marshals spread throughout the thousands of aircraft flying everyday.
To: LuisBasco
The inevitable!
15
posted on
02/18/2003 11:55:02 AM PST
by
Howie
To: LuisBasco
The use of lots of capital letters in any communication should be sufficient grounds to revoke the flying status of any pilot due to instability.
16
posted on
02/18/2003 11:57:48 AM PST
by
Chancellor Palpatine
(those who unilaterally beat their swords into plowshares wind up plowing for those who don't)
To: elbucko
I don't think that the "powers that be" have given any consideration to the possibility that a large sector of the public is NOT flying because pilots aren't armed yet. Or that we're not flying until they stop searching grandmothers in wheelchairs...
Here is the pilots' organization dedicated to defending the lives of American pilots from the bureaucrats (including unfortunately George Bush, of whom I must reluctantly conclude that he is unwilling to put a stop to this lunacy):
Airline Pilots' Security Alliance
8190 Beechmont Ave # 340
Cincinnati, OH 45255-6117
17
posted on
02/18/2003 11:58:05 AM PST
by
fire_eye
To: fire_eye
I wonder to what extent that pilots' organization supports the right of citizens generally to arm ourselves for our own defense.
Probably not at all, in which case I say, fine:
I'll support arming pilots when pilots support an armed citizenry.
18
posted on
02/18/2003 1:40:06 PM PST
by
Redbob
To: fire_eye
I just went through JFK, a few weeks ago. Everyone's shoes were being inpected, some of the workers did NOT speak english. It seemed like the keystone cops on parade.
How many axes are allowed in the cockpit? Heavy duty flashlights?
To: Blood of Tyrants
I just met with a fella who was complaining about the added time it takes at the airport these days so that he can carry his loaded gun as a passenger on commercial flights.
His employer? The FOREST SERVICE!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson