Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mudboy Slim
No, not really. If I recall correctly, they endorsed Bush in 1992, Dole in 96, and Bush in 2000. It's odd - they have a smattering of leftist articles, then a smattering of conservative ones, and then endorsement time, they generally make the right choice.

Regards, Ivan

35 posted on 02/08/2003 8:56:58 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: MadIvan; Happygal; jla; Liz; Libloather; WatchNKorea; goldilucky
"...they have a smattering of leftist articles, then a smattering of conservative ones, and then endorsement time, they generally make the right choice."

Fair enuff...as I look back at the article, I now recognize that this did not come from the Economist's Editorial page, so I take back my slur against the paper in general. This particular correspondent, though, is a Leftist DOLT in the Molly Ivins mold, IMHO...MUD

BTW...we oughtta FReep this chick with a ton of emails from individual FReepers who either were at CPAC or wish they could have been.

39 posted on 02/08/2003 9:03:49 AM PST by Mudboy Slim (Bill Clinton's last words, "And I wouldda gotten away with it except fer those meddlin' FReepers!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson