Skip to comments.
DMCA: Ma Bell Would Be Proud
wired news ^
| 1.20.03
| Lauren Weinstein
Posted on 01/21/2003 10:21:18 AM PST by freepatriot32
Edited on 06/29/2004 7:09:39 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Get out your wallet. Big business has found another way to tighten the screws on customers, in league with its new partner: the notorious Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
Just as naysayers predicted when it was enacted, the DMCA's anticompetitive impact is reverberating widely beyond the entertainment and software industries, with potentially devastating effects on consumers.
(Excerpt) Read more at wired.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: against; anticompetitive; bell; big; business; dmca; guy; ma; monopoly
To: All
Interesting.
2
posted on
01/21/2003 10:25:48 AM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: All
He Pledges his Allegiance to the Left
|
|
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3
posted on
01/21/2003 10:26:39 AM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: Support Free Republic
Very interesting...
4
posted on
01/21/2003 10:32:12 AM PST
by
trebb
To: freepatriot32
It's not just a matter of cheap toner or compatibility issues. The same restrictive rationale and techniques can be applied to limit safety and reliability inspections for a vast range of critical products -- everything from electronic voting machines to security systems to computerized car-engine controllers.When applied to consumer products, the closed nature of the systems also raises the possibility that the digital systems are doing something averse to your interests, despite the fact that you paid for them and are entitled to be sure they are not working against your interests.
To: freepatriot32
Where's Bush2000 to defend the DMCA and the anticompetitive practices that it allows?
(Oh, and people are aware that the Tom Daschle pic used in that fundraising advert is fake, right?)
6
posted on
01/21/2003 11:40:52 AM PST
by
Dimensio
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: Dimensio; Bush2000
I think you gotta ping him if you want him...
8
posted on
01/21/2003 3:48:09 PM PST
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Dimensio
Where's Bush2000 to defend the DMCA and the anticompetitive practices that it allows?
Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!!! What histrionics! This case hasn't been adjudicated yet. Until it has, it's all just speculative crap. Go hug a tree or something.
9
posted on
01/21/2003 4:05:10 PM PST
by
Bush2000
To: freepatriot32
To defend Bell (as I usually do). The phones back then were the equivilant of the cable box. Bell owned the equipment and access to the lines and people simply leased it. As such you had no right to modify it.
10
posted on
01/21/2003 5:31:38 PM PST
by
Bogey78O
(It's not a Zero it's an "O")
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson