Skip to comments.
Amb Mark Ginsberg Contradicts HansBlix "No Smoking Gun": Inspectors have NOT visited Military Sites
Fox News ^
| 9 Jan 03
| Amb Mark Ginsberg
Posted on 01/09/2003 9:36:58 AM PST by xzins
Ambassador Ginsberg clearly spells out how big a coward and liar Hans Blix is.
He says that Blix has not visited even one military site. Therefore, the "no smoking gun" claim is a LIE!! Blix "might" visit an Air Force Base next week.
Ginsberg asks the obvious question: WHO WOULD HAVE POSSESSION OF WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION? He says it would be the military.
This is obvious. If you have chemical rounds, they would be with an artillery unit. If you have bio/chem warheads for missiles, they'd be with missile units.
DID THE UN NEGOTIATE A DEAL THAT PERMITS THE IRAQI MILITARY TO BE OFF-BASE FOR INSPECTIONS?
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: blix; inspection; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
1
posted on
01/09/2003 9:36:58 AM PST
by
xzins
To: xzins
bttt
2
posted on
01/09/2003 9:39:34 AM PST
by
kcvl
To: kcvl
Ginsberg says it's silly to visit a "baby food factory" and not visit an artillery unit.
Makes incredible sense to me!!
3
posted on
01/09/2003 9:42:19 AM PST
by
xzins
To: xzins
Inspectors have NOT visited Military SitesAgain the UN has proven its irrelevance...
4
posted on
01/09/2003 9:43:49 AM PST
by
prophetic
To: xzins
DUH! lol!
5
posted on
01/09/2003 9:46:03 AM PST
by
kcvl
To: xzins; mhking; Poohbah; section9; Miss Marple; JohnHuang2
Man... this is getting real old...
6
posted on
01/09/2003 9:49:13 AM PST
by
hchutch
(Saddam, you've got to ask yourself one question: Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?)
To: prophetic; aristeides; Travis McGee; Blueflag
As I think about it, this ties directly into Aziz statement yesterday about "inspectors trying to determine the status of military forces" and calling inspectors "spies."
If the agreement permitted close inspection of any military unit, then he couldn't safely make that statement.
He's setting the stage for complaining about national security IF the inspectors get pressured to visit ANY/ALL military sites.
Can anyone tell me how we can determine if there are missile capable warheads if inspectors DO NOT OR CAN NOT thoroughly inspect missile units, launchers, all support units, and all paper and electronic trails/tracks?
7
posted on
01/09/2003 9:49:38 AM PST
by
xzins
To: xzins
Admittedly, I am the worst "strategist" on this forum. And what you said makes sense to me.
It's ridiculous to say you've looked for WMD when you don't even look in the most obvious places.
I don't have any weapons here at my house, do you?
8
posted on
01/09/2003 9:52:25 AM PST
by
Howlin
(I cannot stop playing Collapse II -- HELP ME!)
To: Howlin
Well...yes...I do
But NO WMD's. LOL!!
Special weapons are a big deal with our US military. Aviation, Artillery, Air Force.
They don't store them with Gerber's Baby Foods.
9
posted on
01/09/2003 9:56:35 AM PST
by
xzins
To: xzins
Um....okay, you got me. Maybe I should have said "government issued weapons!"
10
posted on
01/09/2003 9:57:18 AM PST
by
Howlin
(I cannot stop playing Collapse II -- HELP ME!)
Bump
To: xzins
He says that Blix has not visited even one military site. Therefore, the "no smoking gun" claim is a LIE!! Blix "might" visit an Air Force Base next week. Well "technically" it's not a lie .. if Blix and the Inspector's don't go there, then the don't see it and they don't know anything about it
Democrats do that all the time .. if they don't read an article or a report they can't claim to know anything about it .. The files Ken Star lock up in the Ford Building comes to mind
This is such an old game
12
posted on
01/09/2003 9:59:05 AM PST
by
Mo1
(I HATE DEMOCRATS !!!)
To: xzins
There's not much point in finding WMD prior to us being ready to do something about it. That appears to be at least 4 or 5 weeks from now at the earliest.
There may be more method to this lunacy than appears to the casual eye.
13
posted on
01/09/2003 10:02:09 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: xzins
Of course not! They've been telling Blix where to go. Plus Blix doesn't WANT to find any weapons. He's got his story and he's sticking to it.
14
posted on
01/09/2003 10:08:14 AM PST
by
mhking
To: mhking
Hey, king, can you put this out on your ping list?
15
posted on
01/09/2003 10:09:20 AM PST
by
xzins
To: Dog Gone
What you say makes sense.
The problem is that it gives Iraq a leg up in the propaganda war.
Helen Thomas (commie Helen) is playing it up big at a press conference on FoxNews right now.
16
posted on
01/09/2003 10:11:03 AM PST
by
xzins
To: mhking
Last time, Saddam wouldn't let any inspecters into the presidential palaces...
This time, the inspecters are not even asking, let alone demanding to look at them...
17
posted on
01/09/2003 10:12:00 AM PST
by
Iscool
To: xzins
Helen Thomas is a socialist/marxist whore
next.........
To: cactusSharp
Helen Thomas is a socialist/marxist whore And those are her good qualities...
19
posted on
01/09/2003 10:14:36 AM PST
by
Iscool
To: cactusSharp
Helen Thomas...whore..... NOT FAIR!! You've created a mental image that is ..... (regurg reflex)....disgusting!! LOL!
20
posted on
01/09/2003 10:14:51 AM PST
by
xzins
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-71 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson