Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: madfly
I may be wrong about this, but I have read the Supreme Court has ruled that no one has to have a driver's license.

2 posted on 10/15/2002 5:16:39 AM PDT by Trickyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Trickyguy
That may be, but you will need very deep pockets to keep the army of attorneys you will need to stay on the road, and you will need to be wealthy enough to not be employed and working for a living. All the time these efforts consume will preclude you from doing anything else.
7 posted on 10/15/2002 5:28:52 AM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Trickyguy
I may be wrong about this, but I have read the Supreme Court has ruled that no one has to have a driver's license.

You are wrong about this. The US Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld a state's authority to require that all motorists be licensed, be insured, etc.

26 posted on 10/15/2002 6:24:52 AM PDT by DonQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Trickyguy
Where?
70 posted on 10/15/2002 8:33:31 AM PDT by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Trickyguy
Of course you don't have to have a driver's license -- but you can be prohibited from driving on public roads if you don't have one.
156 posted on 10/15/2002 2:10:41 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson