Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(V)Lautenberg: "Senator Torricelli's Poster Boy"
10-03-02 | Tall_Texan

Posted on 10/03/2002 12:34:33 AM PDT by Tall_Texan

Memo to Doug Forrester:

Time to take the gloves off and the best way to do this is to go on a verbal assault of Frank Lautenberg by calling him the worst thing he can possibly imagine - "Senator Torricelli's Poster Boy"

Imply that Lautenberg is simply a stooge, a "pretty face" to con the voters of New Jersey because Torricelli was too corrupt to get re-elected so now, like an aging model in need of plastic surgery, the Democrats are trying to give the campaign a face-lift and nothing more.

Since the Democrats obviously have no respect for the laws of New Jersey, who's to say which candidate the Democrats will run if "Pretty Boy" Lautenberg doesn't give them the desired poll results by next week? Will they run Bruce Springsteen? Bill Clinton? Elle McPherson? Ask Lautenberg who will be his stand-in when the two are debating.

Make Lautenberg either *defend* Torricelli (by claiming there's no difference between the two) or trash Torricelli and, indirectly, his own party.

Call him out. Make him prove he isn't just a puppet for Torricelli's party bosses. Insist that he's not in the campaign just for this week. Release your medical records, Frank. Release your tax returns, Frank. Tell us which nannies you've hired, Frank, and whether any were in the country illegally. That's what serious candidates do when they run for political office.

"Are you just a Torricelli stand-in?"

Shame him for being a party to the "Torricelli scam". Tell him that a candidate for the U.S. Senate ought to face the voters for an entire campaign, not just the last month.

Then remind the voters that you're the only major party candidate in New Jersey who actually wants the job. That you're the only major party candidate that won his party's nomination in the primaries, not by "sleazy last-minute deals". That you're the only major party candidate that honored the election laws of the State of New Jersey and the only major party candidate that would treat the Constitution like it was the law and not like a rulebook to find ways of circumventing.

The opportunity is there, Doug. Go for the jugular. Knock this senile old carcass on his ass before he even has his campaign started. And go find Ed Rollins.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: dirtydemocrats; forrester; humiliatelautenberg; newjoisey; torricelli
I could go on and on. The door is wide open to publicly shame and humiliate Lautenberg and treat him like he is just Torricelli's stand-in. You get the drift.

I'm serious. If I were Forrester, I couldn't wait for the first debate to basicly tear this man to shreds.

1 posted on 10/03/2002 12:34:33 AM PDT by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Lautenberg was he not sent packing by the Senate for some ethics problem he had. So he resigned also. If so what was the charge?
2 posted on 10/03/2002 12:42:47 AM PDT by Phyto Chems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phyto Chems
Maybe somebody else can answer that, but the point is that there doesn't need to be anything.

He hates Torricelli so the worst thing you could possibly do to him is make him look like he's Torricelli's puppet. Belittle him at every turn and make him out to be in cahoots with Torricelli to pull a scam on the voters of New Jersey. Hammer it home. Morph the two. Just as we tarred Gore with Clinton in 2000.

3 posted on 10/03/2002 12:49:38 AM PDT by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Good point about how they dis-like each other.
Although the other thing is one corupt one for another.
4 posted on 10/03/2002 12:54:41 AM PDT by Phyto Chems
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Phyto Chems
Lautenberg did not have any known ethics problems. He retired from the senate in 2000. His explanation for retirement was fairly simple and quite believable "I'm getting too old for this sh*t!" (paraphrasing).
5 posted on 10/03/2002 1:11:06 AM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
That is all well and good, but there is nothing to stop the Democrats from Lautenberg, assuming he wins, retire again and the Governor from appointing the Torch to fill out "his" term!

On second thought, it is not even necessary for Lautenberg to get the most votes! The New Jersey Supreme Court could decide that the guy with the second most votes should be elected! After all, Algore got more votes than George W Bush. Payback is only "fair".

6 posted on 10/03/2002 2:04:41 AM PDT by SubMareener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
This is inconsequential. There's nothing wrong with Lautenberg beyond the fact that he's a Democrat politician.

The focus shouldn't be on Lautenberg but on the Dems' (and NJSC) flippant disregard for the law.

Otherwise, just defeat Lautenberg because you are better than he is. If the Repub candidate can't do that on the merits, what the h*ll is he running for?

7 posted on 10/03/2002 3:51:47 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phyto Chems
My recollection is he simply retired. Some people don't WANT to be politicians till they die.
8 posted on 10/03/2002 3:52:38 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
I agree. Tear into Frank Lautenberg and remind Democratic primary voters their party leadership basically annulled their choice in their own primary and selected him as part of a sleazy back room deal. Tell New Jersey voters that by agreeing to be The Torch's replacement, Lautenberg demonstrated a lack of ethics and is in the race for only one reason: he's the new candidate the Rats think can retain control of the Senate for them. Its time to send Tommy Daschund and the corrupt Democratic leadership the clear message that undermining the rule of law won't bring them any political benefits. The best way N.J voters can send the message its time for the Democratic Party to clean up its act is to send Doug Forrester to the U.S Senate to end Daschund's reign as the illegitimate Senate Majority Leader. In short, crime should not pay in our country.
9 posted on 10/03/2002 3:57:46 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I want to see the polls on this next week. I've got to think even Jersey democrats will be repulsed by these goings-on.
10 posted on 10/03/2002 3:59:50 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Agreed, Lautenberg has no mind...agreeing to be the DNC's "b_tch", Forrester should make this into the mockery that it is. When debating Frank-the stand-in, Forrester should drag out a lifesize cardboard cutout of Bill Clinton to be his stand in choice and then walk off the stage. Even losing to this level of corruption has its advantages. A lot of propaganda fed Americans are waking up and seeing the Democratic Crime Syndicate for what it is.
11 posted on 10/03/2002 4:20:24 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
"Lautenberg is simply a "pretty face"

In the party of Donna Shalala and Helen Thomas, you might be right!

12 posted on 10/03/2002 4:28:32 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Who the hell needs Ed Rollins? You would make a fine campaign advisor...JFK
13 posted on 10/03/2002 4:32:10 AM PDT by BADROTOFINGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
"Torricelli Lite"
14 posted on 10/03/2002 4:33:51 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Tex, I fully agree with your bare knuckles approach.

An interesting campaign device that I've been mulling is an ad and billboard with a picture of the Torch juxtaposed next to a picture of the Cadaver.

Under the Torch's picture, simply print the word, "BAIT" The Cadaver's picture would be labelled, "SWITCH." I don't have the talent to put that together, but I'd love to have one of our resident graphic geniuses do it.

Any takers?

15 posted on 10/03/2002 4:36:30 AM PDT by Lightnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
The perfect campaign commercial will:

1. Compare Lautenberg to Torricelli.
2. Remind voters that Torricelli's ethics problems made him drop out of the race to be illegally substituted for by Lautenberg.
3. Attack Lautenberg's with a sideways dig about his age.

Commercial starts with a picture that morphs back and forth from a picture of Torricelli into a picture of Lautenberg.

Voiceover:
On September 30 Senator Torricelli, realizing that New Jersey voters had rejected his pattern of unethical behavior, withdrew from the Senate race.

On October 2nd ,in clear violation of New Jersey election law, the New Jersey Democratic party political machine brought Frank Lautenberg out of retirement to replace the ethically challenged Torricelli on the ballot.

On November 5th New Jersey Voter have a chance to say NO to the Toricelli brand of politics, a chance to say NO to Frank Lautenberg's old and tired ideas.

Vote Doug Forester on November 5th.


Well what do you think ?

If I had the money I'd pay to run this commercial myself.
16 posted on 10/03/2002 4:56:11 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

Courtesy of inkling.

17 posted on 10/03/2002 4:58:09 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Now Available At Amazon.com:


18 posted on 10/03/2002 5:01:13 AM PDT by End_Clintonism_Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lightnin

Hows this?


19 posted on 10/03/2002 5:12:22 AM PDT by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: smith288
Beautiful, Smitty!

My only suggestion would be to find less flattering pictures of the pair.

There was a b/w picture of Lousenberg on this thread that I particularly liked.

20 posted on 10/03/2002 5:28:07 AM PDT by Lightnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Love it, Howlin!

Could you insert the title at the top of the graphic something like: Brought to you by Party Bosses of New Jersey

21 posted on 10/03/2002 5:30:57 AM PDT by Lightnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lightnin; inkling
We'll see if inkling can do that; that's his work!
22 posted on 10/03/2002 5:34:39 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: apillar
One thing we can all do is send a modest check to the Forrester campaign. Every little bit helps. My check goes today.
23 posted on 10/03/2002 5:41:16 AM PDT by Lightnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Lightnin

Any better?


24 posted on 10/03/2002 6:00:25 AM PDT by smith288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Miss Marple; Poohbah
Good grief... "Bait and switch" is becoming a juggernaut...
25 posted on 10/03/2002 6:10:53 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: smith288
Great! The NJ GOP ought to hire you!
26 posted on 10/03/2002 6:14:16 AM PDT by Lightnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

TAKE BACK THE SENATE!

VOTE OUT THE DEMS!

DONATE TODAY!!!.
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
Become A Monthly Donor
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

27 posted on 10/03/2002 6:17:49 AM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Actually, if you read the release that Forrester issued yesterday regarding the Torricelli-Lautenberg candidacy, you may find many of your proposals.
28 posted on 10/03/2002 6:21:07 AM PDT by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Your plan would backfire.

Torricelli and the democrats are the lying jerks.

Lautenberg's just a kind old man -- a dupe. The fact democrats would use this old man in such a shameless way is the story. He's old, he's tired and he doesn't need to be used and used badly by power hungry democrats. Have they no shame?

Democrats talk the talk of traitors and exploiters.

29 posted on 10/03/2002 6:28:59 AM PDT by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: apillar
Campaign Ad #1:

(closeup of a street hustler (great if he looks like McGreevey or McAuliffe) using the old three-shell game. As the rubber ball gets switched around under the three shells)

Step right up and watch the Democrat candidates for the New Jersey Senate race. Follow it if you can. One minute the candidate is

(ball morphes into the head of Torricelli)

this guy and the next day its

(ball morphs into head of Lautenberg)

this guy

but the campaign is still young and the Democrats could pull another switcheroo. Next week it could be (ball morphs into the head of Bill Clinton)

this guy

or possibly

(ball morphs into the head of Osama bin Laden)

this guy.

And if they actually win the election, who knows how long their candidate du juor is willing to stay in office?

How can you trust them at their word? If the laws put together by the New Jersey legislature can't stop their shell games, what will?

YOU can. By voting for Doug Forrester, the only major party candidate who won his primary's nomination and the only one you can be certain will serve his full six-year term if elected.

KNOW who you're electing. Vote FORRESTER on November 5th.

.

.

.

Campaign Ad #2

(picture of a snorting pig)

The Democrats ran a greasy, slimy, smelly pig this year for the U.S. Senate. One that was covered in dirt. But their polls showed the pig wouldn't win so they gave the pig a face-lift.

(superimpose the head of Lautenberg onto the pig)

There, now they think you'll vote for the pig. Still not sure? Maybe if they add a pretty blue bonnet...

(superimpose bonnet on Lautenberg's head)

There! Maybe NOW you'll vote for the pig!

Or maybe you think the U.S. Senate is more important than to elect a greasy, slimy, smelly pig with a new face. Vote for the candidate who doesn't engage in cosmetic surgery to save their campaign.

New Jersey deserves better than to be run by the same old pigs. Vote DOUG FORRESTER for U.S. Senate on November 5th.

30 posted on 10/03/2002 9:45:56 AM PDT by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Illbay; goldstategop; BADROTOFINGER; Lightnin; End_Clintonism_Now; Redleg Duke; inkling; ...
See Post 30.
31 posted on 10/03/2002 9:54:49 AM PDT by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
Tex, love your stuff!

Another variation on your theme would be to place a picture of the Torch, McGreavy and Lousenberg side by side with the following under their names:

Tinkerer to Levers to CHANCE?

Might be a little to subtle for the majority of NJ numbnuts!

Maybe we ought start a new Forrester campaign ad contest and invite the Forrester campaign staff to look in.

32 posted on 10/03/2002 10:12:25 AM PDT by Lightnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
I was just listening to Rush Limbaugh and the discussion was that Laughteberg has no intention of fulfilling a term. (wich is the plan) If he should be elected he will resign in January and the Govenor will then replace him WITH WHO THEY REALLY HAVE WAITING IN THE WINGS.
33 posted on 10/03/2002 10:13:10 AM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lightnin
Whoops, make that "too"

Gotta preview these a little more carefully!

34 posted on 10/03/2002 10:14:51 AM PDT by Lightnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
I don't think there's any question about that, Spunky.

Wouldn't it be a Hoot if they have Slick in the wings?

35 posted on 10/03/2002 10:17:59 AM PDT by Lightnin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
That's fine, but it's just typical negative advertising (i.e. "don't talk about what your candidate is for, talk about what the OTHER guy's problems are.") If I were a typical "uncommitted" voter I'd be unimpressed if you're asking me to vote for your candidate because he'll actually stay in office.

BTW, that isn't to say it wouldn't work. I'm not typically impressed with neg ads, but they must work because people use them all the time especially toward the end of the campaign.

36 posted on 10/03/2002 10:41:08 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lightnin
Wouldn't it be a Hoot if they have Slick in the wings?

I was just reading on another thread that it appears Clinton owns a piece of property in NJ so would qualify.

Sleeeeeeze Willy was part of the backroom negotiations.

37 posted on 10/03/2002 10:44:47 AM PDT by Spunky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lightnin
Tinkerer to Levers to CHANCE?

LOL! An old baseball historian like myself gets the joke but I don't know how many others would. Good job anyways.

38 posted on 10/03/2002 10:51:21 AM PDT by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Sleeeeeeze Willy was part of the backroom negotiations.

The telltale sign is that he is out of the country so it can be alleged that he was out of the loop. Just like 9-11.

Most of the time when Slick wants it to seem he was no part of the dirty deed, he leaves the country.

39 posted on 10/03/2002 10:55:38 AM PDT by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson