'New urgency' over Saddam: Baghdad makes 'recent breakthrough' in production of nuke bomb

Insight Magazine ^ | 9/30/02 | Kenneth R. Timmerman

[knighthawk]

Middle East list

If people want on or off this list, please let me know.

[knighthawk]

Yes, I really like part about the European business with Iraq. I will read the rest tomorrow!

[Dog]

Timmerman ping!

[oyez]

We're at Maximum Pucker (Pm), folks...

Sombody needs to explain pucker factor to the Kofi, The U stinkin' N, and the Democratic Leadership.

[oyez]

A test shipment or better yet a diversionary shipment.

[EternalHope]

Great info.

[Travis McGee]

When an American city is gutted and ruined by a smuggled in nuke, I hope that Bonier and about 500 other UNamerican traitors are marched to the nearest tree and hung.

[watchin]

It goes like this:

1. There's no urgency. Saddam doesn't have nukes.

2. If he does, it's too dangerous to attack him.

3. If neither of the above is true, we can go to war.

[VOA]

I am so sick of people arguing with me about the urgency factor. I warned people that
time lines don't apply with Saddam because his back is to the wall. Now I have a
sick feeling inside.

1993: radical Islamic terrorists bomb one of the towers of The World Trade Center,
but FAIL to topple the structure.

2001: Eight years later, radical Islamic terrorist RETURN and SUCCEED
in not only destroying a tower of The World Trade Center, they destroy both towers
and a number of surrounding structures.
While the terrorists also succeed in attacking The Pentagon...
they FAIL to attack the Capitol Building when passengers thwart the terrorist crew
aboard Flight 93.

I cite these FACTS to some of my more Democratic/Liberal colleagues and
ask them...

"How long do you think it will be before the terrorists return and finish off The Capitol Building?
And how stupid can you be to work in/around The Capitol Building and not DEMAND
that we go after Sadaam...the most likely source of a nuclear/chemical/biological
weapon that would be used to succeed where Flight 93 failed?"

I mostly get the dull stare of well-fed cattle from them.

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

That sums it up perfectly, especially when you know they are feeling all this rather than thinking it.

[pankot]

Traitors=RATS

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

Isn't it amazing? I remember seeing a news broadcast back in '93 of people boldly walking back into the World Trade Center, just as nonchallant as you like. It was downright surreal. I was a registered democrat at the time, BTW. And something really bothered me about peoples' indifference about that attack. But hey. I got distracted too. I assumed our government was on top of things as best as it could be and went on with my 6 [or more] day workweeks with long hours. '93 was a very strange year. I left the DNC shortly afterwards. FReegards....