Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can you imagine working for a company like this?
email | email

Posted on 09/04/2002 10:00:53 AM PDT by MissBaby

Can you imagine working for a company that has a little more than 500 employees and has the following statistics:

29 have been accused of spousal abuse

7 have been arrested for fraud

19 have been accused of writing bad checks

117 have directly or indirectly bankrupted at least 2 businesses

3 have done time for assault

71 cannot get a credit card due to bad credit

14 have been arrested on drug related charges

8 have been arrested for shop lifting

21 are currently defendants in law suits

84 have been arrested for drunk driving in the last year

Can you guess what organization this is?


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congres; veryseries
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-64 next last

1 posted on 09/04/2002 10:00:53 AM PDT by MissBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
It's a hoax.
2 posted on 09/04/2002 10:01:25 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
Congress and/or Senate
3 posted on 09/04/2002 10:01:57 AM PDT by smiley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby; Constitution Day
Well, after seeing the keyword here, I must say this is very series!
4 posted on 09/04/2002 10:03:00 AM PDT by truenospinzone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
Has to be the US House of Representatives.
5 posted on 09/04/2002 10:03:32 AM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truenospinzone
Series, indeed. First in a ~?
6 posted on 09/04/2002 10:03:53 AM PDT by gridlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
Funny, but not true.

I only wish we could arrest 113 Congresscritters!
7 posted on 09/04/2002 10:04:03 AM PDT by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truenospinzone
Congres is never series enough.
8 posted on 09/04/2002 10:05:32 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
This is supposed to represent Congress and it is a couple of years old.
9 posted on 09/04/2002 10:06:08 AM PDT by wimpycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
It's a hoax.

What is a hoax?

10 posted on 09/04/2002 10:06:52 AM PDT by MissBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truenospinzone
I wish you wiseacres would begin to take these issues more serially.
11 posted on 09/04/2002 10:09:42 AM PDT by gundog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
What you posted. It's not true. Emails rarely are.

Snopes on the hoax

12 posted on 09/04/2002 10:11:19 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
What is a hoax?

A hoax is like a trick or a deception, basically something that's not true, and if a hoax is perpetrated with intent to defraud, it's very series, indeed!

LOL!!! ;)

13 posted on 09/04/2002 10:11:43 AM PDT by 88keys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/outrage/congress.htm

J
14 posted on 09/04/2002 10:13:32 AM PDT by J. L. Chamberlain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
Bubba Clinton's friends?
15 posted on 09/04/2002 10:15:53 AM PDT by BulletBrasDotNet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gundog
I guess we are just serial smartalecks.
16 posted on 09/04/2002 10:16:08 AM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
I of course knew this was not true and was merely making sure all of you were on your toes. As usual, you are. Good job. Keep up the good work.
17 posted on 09/04/2002 10:17:23 AM PDT by MissBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
Sounds like my family reunion...
18 posted on 09/04/2002 10:18:22 AM PDT by Cacophonous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
Roman Catholic church ?
19 posted on 09/04/2002 10:20:46 AM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: J. L. Chamberlain
The Snopes rundown on this is extraordinarily preachy. Usually they are content to expose the hoax, but this one was written by a real Congress-lover.
20 posted on 09/04/2002 10:23:26 AM PDT by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
Can you guess what organization this is?

Sounds like the Chevy dealership where my wife works.

21 posted on 09/04/2002 10:28:46 AM PDT by Between the Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby; All
Well, can we Freepers come up with an accurate, irrefutable, "snopes-proof" list? We have Torricelli, Rostenkowski, Kennedy, Barney "My Boy Lollipop" Frank...
22 posted on 09/04/2002 10:30:00 AM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gundog
I wish you wiseacres would begin to take these issues more serially.

Okay.


23 posted on 09/04/2002 10:31:12 AM PDT by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
The government? Actually, no, the numbers would be higher.
24 posted on 09/04/2002 10:32:23 AM PDT by Little Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
I bet our list, would have more than 113 congresscritters on it.
25 posted on 09/04/2002 10:32:42 AM PDT by vin-one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
Could it be Congres?
OOh, that's very series.

(But the keywords gave it away.)

26 posted on 09/04/2002 10:32:52 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
The snopes article didn't say it wasn't true.
27 posted on 09/04/2002 10:37:13 AM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
Well hello, Dali!
28 posted on 09/04/2002 10:41:03 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace
When you report a fact, it is up to you to verify it's authenticity. The lack of any dates or names would make it impossible to verify therefore rendering it presumably false.

Not only that, you should not repeat something as a fact unless you know it is true.

29 posted on 09/04/2002 10:41:05 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
BWAHAHAHAHAHAAA!
30 posted on 09/04/2002 10:41:18 AM PDT by gundog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
I'd like to see a party breakdown on this.
31 posted on 09/04/2002 10:49:57 AM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
This guy took it very series...


32 posted on 09/04/2002 10:50:20 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
It's a hoax.

No doubt. Some congresscritter probably started circulating this to rehabilitate congress' image.

"Don't tell mom I'm a senator, she still thinks I play piano in a whorehouse."

33 posted on 09/04/2002 10:50:27 AM PDT by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: J. L. Chamberlain; Arthur McGowan; AppyPappy
Snopes has a well-known liberal, pro-Big Government, bias. I wouldn't trust them to tell the truth on something like this, and instead expect them to bend over backwards to "prove" it false.
34 posted on 09/04/2002 10:50:30 AM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gundog
You guys have been making hay out of this cereal nonsense, despite the fact that there isn't a grain of truth to any of it. But then I guess making corny jokes is easier than having intelligent intercourse on the exposed breasts issue.
35 posted on 09/04/2002 10:50:34 AM PDT by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
the exposed breasts issue.

Where? I missed that thread.

36 posted on 09/04/2002 10:54:43 AM PDT by mc5cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
What is a hoax?

A musical instrument often played by Bill Clinton.

37 posted on 09/04/2002 10:56:02 AM PDT by Cachelot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
Congress. Yes this is an old one that has been going around email for quite a while. Sadly true though.
38 posted on 09/04/2002 11:00:47 AM PDT by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chemist_Geek
Then you should have no trouble finding the evidence that it is real, right? We'll wait patiently.
39 posted on 09/04/2002 11:04:18 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mc5cents
The Exposed Breast Issue
40 posted on 09/04/2002 11:04:19 AM PDT by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: 88keys
A hoax is like a trick or a deception, basically something that's not true

But that's not important now...

41 posted on 09/04/2002 11:06:13 AM PDT by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
Heeeheee
42 posted on 09/04/2002 11:18:14 AM PDT by FryingPan101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
It's not entirely a hoax. Some of the stats are believable, some are not. At least one (the bad checks) is probably understated. (Remember the House Bank?) The number of drunk drivers seems both implausibly high and impossible for anyone to have tallied. (If there's no accident, and the police let a guy off because he's a Congressman, one wouldn't expect any paperwork to exist on that.)

Further, the Snopes "debunking" article goes on and on about innocence until proven guilty, but that concept has less meaning here because:

1) As Snopes said, Congress has certain arrest immunities when in session.

2) Innocent until proven guilty is a term that applies to punishment by the criminal justice system, not to political judgements. We don't have to "prove" that a politician has broken the law to let it affect our political judgement, just as we don't have to "prove" his lesser, nonlegal offenses (e.g., incompetence, ideological disagreement with us, whatever) before letting such factors affect our judgement and/or votes.

3) We're talking statistics of large numbers here -- again, not whether to punish an individual. If you're thinking of going to work for a trucking firm in New York, and 10 out of 20 employees have been arrested for racketeering, loan sharking, etc., you'd reasonably suspect that there's something there: it's a mob operation of some sort, and you'd be a fool to go to work for it. (Unless you want to join the mob.)

43 posted on 09/04/2002 11:21:40 AM PDT by DWPittelli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
But that's not important now...

Oh, heehee! Thanks for the pic...made my day! ;)

44 posted on 09/04/2002 11:21:43 AM PDT by 88keys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
Sounds like a case for Yahoo Series!


45 posted on 09/04/2002 11:26:07 AM PDT by TC Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MissBaby
Sounds like the company I worked for before my current job.
46 posted on 09/04/2002 11:31:31 AM PDT by al_c
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach; gundog; TC Rider; FryingPan101; mc5cents
You guys have been making hay out of this cereal nonsense, despite the fact that there isn't a grain of truth to any of it.


Ceres was the ancient Latin goddess of vegetation, whose worship merged completely with that of the Greek goddess Demeter.

47 posted on 09/04/2002 2:08:29 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
ROTFLOL
48 posted on 09/04/2002 2:13:54 PM PDT by FryingPan101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
All I am saying is that Snopes basically made excuses for why it wouldn't be a big deal if the Congressmen couldn't get a credit card, or how it's no big deal so many were pulled over for suspicion of DUI.
49 posted on 09/04/2002 4:55:06 PM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day
LOL! How many inches or feet would you say she was in demeter?

I'm being cirrus about this.

50 posted on 09/04/2002 5:56:13 PM PDT by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson