[lavaroise]

By and large, it is society, not the individual, that chooses whether homosexuality will be widely practiced. A society's values, much more than individual tendencies, determine the extent of homosexuality in that society. Thus, we can have great sympathy for the exclusively homosexual individual while strongly opposing social acceptance of homosexuality. In this way we retain both our hearts and our values.

This goes hand in hand with what I am saying. Notwithstanding the disturbing transcending supremacism of sexual preference over all other jurisdictional, moral and biological mandates.

This evil however did not start out of nowhere, but from heterosexual promiscuous "sexual revolution" of the 60s. The day the self definition and self-statement of sex became the evangelical motto of those perverts, is the day people became defined object as opposed to living jurisdictions mindful of right and wrong, sense and nonsense, greed for flesh and humility, fascist preferences or fairness, theft of body or protection thereof.

[ArGee]

This evil however did not start out of nowhere, but from heterosexual promiscuous "sexual revolution" of the 60s.

You said it, and well.

Shalom.

[Jorge]

This evil however did not start out of nowhere, but from heterosexual promiscuous "sexual revolution" of the 60s.

Exactly. Those who focus only on homosexuality as the danger to society aren't seeing the whole picture.