Skip to comments.
Going up? Space elevator wins support
U.S. company builds on Russian idea
National Post ^
| 8/13/02
| Dan Rowe
Posted on 08/13/2002 7:55:13 PM PDT by Brett66
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
To: Brett66
The world's number one terrorist target!
21
posted on
08/13/2002 8:47:49 PM PDT
by
Restorer
To: Brett66
Something is up with the database. Same thing happened to my double post.
To: billybudd
compensate for the extreme forces That is why, while I know the thing can be built, it won't be a yard wide and paper thin all the way up. At the point of maximum stress, which is, if I recall, quite a ways up toward geosynch altitude, it will have to be really thick, like a mile in diameter and taper towards each end.
To: Restorer
The world's number one terrorist target! It will be that, however I think the security problems are negotiable. No fly zones around it with missile batteries ready to launch would be appropriate defense, also the passengers will be scrutinized more severely than any airport. El-al hasn't had any terrorist problems for a while, no reason we couldn't match or exceed their record with proper planning.
24
posted on
08/13/2002 8:55:41 PM PDT
by
Brett66
To: Brett66
Unlike the science fiction version, this space elevator need not be anchored improbably both to Earth and an asteroid.
The idea of anchoring the ends to the Earth and an asteroid aren't "improbable" or "science fiction"; this is what was proposed at a conference on the subject at Marshall Space Center in 1999. Read about it at this NASA site
The Audacious Space Elevator: Current plans call for a base tower approximately 50 km tall -- the cable would be tethered to the top. To keep the cable structure from tumbling to Earth, it would be attached to a large counterbalance mass beyond geostationary orbit, perhaps an asteroid moved into place for that purpose.
25
posted on
08/13/2002 8:57:15 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: RightWhale
Nowhere near that much
Accordint to an article by Charles Sheffield in 1979 A constant cross-section Marsstalk was just possible with carbon whiskers 5 times as strong as drawn steel. For Earth it mught need something 5 times stronger, or a CSA taper of 40000 (ie a diameter taper of 200)
Make the material 4 times stronger and if reduces by the fourth root to a CSA taper of <50: Diameter 7 to 1.
I think we have a go here
Earthstalks for Cotopaxi, Kilamajaro and Kwoka (Irian Jaya)!
To: Oztrich Boy
Nobody mentioned tourism. I look forward to apending time in an orbiting hotel, but not during its first year!
To: Oztrich Boy
I think we have a go here I think so, too, even if it requires more than a paper-thin sheet. The elevator will be heavy enough that it should handle far more than this current proposal; like a car bridge, the weight of the load won't matter compared to the weight of the structure. It will be the best thing we have ever done on earth.
29
posted on
08/13/2002 10:29:37 PM PDT
by
D-fendr
To: D-fendr; Libertarianize the GOP
How about Jack and the Beanstalk?
To: Brett66
Russian idea!!? What a load of B.S. What Russian proposed the use of space teathers?
If they are referring to the proposal to boost the orbital altitude of the now defunct Mir space station using the electromagnetic properties of a teather fed with power from Mir's solar arrays, then they are mistaken. That teather was invented and built right here in the USA (San Diego to be precise.) I know the guy who invented, designed and built it, and he certainly was not Russian. He also built previously flown teathers used by the DoD, academia and NASA to do teather orbital dynamics research.
31
posted on
08/14/2002 1:06:43 PM PDT
by
anymouse
To: anymouse
Uh-oh, he better let these journalists know about it or he'll become the next Elisha Gray.
32
posted on
08/14/2002 2:28:12 PM PDT
by
Brett66
To: anymouse
This is not tethers. This is space elevator. All the way from ground to geosynch.
To: RightWhale
That's a lot of carbon.
Maybe this would save us from global warming?
To: PeterPrinciple
this would save us from global warming? Probably not save us from an imaginary fate, but it would use a lot more carbon than what is readily available. We would have to dig for coal, pull dissolved carbon from the oceans, maybe take CO2 from the air, tap volcanic vents, even mine the ocean floor for those frozen methanes.
However, it would allow heavy industry to move into space where they could meet their power needs from sun power and take themselves off the grid. We might generate less waste heat way down here on the surface, whether it matters to the climate or not.
To: Brett66
From there, a 100,000-kilometre-long ribbon about one metre wide with the thickness of a sheet of paper would be propelled by rockets beyond the point in space where orbiting objects remain above a fixed point on the Earth's surface, the so-called geosynchronous orbit.
"Oh, sh*t! We have a knot!"
36
posted on
08/14/2002 2:54:32 PM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: aruanan
I just started Clarke's
Fountains of Paradise, something I last read in high school. It really is such an elegant solution to a difficult problem. It's encouraging that there are as many people working on this as there are.
It amazes me the number of whiners on this forum though. Anytime a revolutionary idea is brought up, there are always posters who are convinced that it won't work or find reasons not to develop the project.
What's the matter with these people?
37
posted on
08/16/2002 7:48:05 AM PDT
by
TomB
To: TomB
???We have MIT degrees in aero/astro??? That can really slow you down and turn you into a real dummy.
NASA 67-94
To: John Jamieson
huh?
39
posted on
08/30/2002 11:24:26 AM PDT
by
TomB
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-39 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson