Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daniel Pipes: Iranians can see their way out of darkness
National Post ^ | July 23 2002 | Daniel Pipes

Posted on 07/23/2002 10:35:05 AM PDT by knighthawk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Clara Lou
Sometimes absurdity is used to highlight truth.

In your case, it's simply ignorance.
21 posted on 07/23/2002 2:18:32 PM PDT by Guillermo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Turkey has managed so far, but for how long before they must confront Islam?

They have, in 1917. Kemal Mustafa (Ataturk) put the mullahs in their place, but he did have a couple of advantages that the current movement in Iran does not enjoy: (1) support of a tight, disciplined, secular cadre named the Young Turks, and (2) control of the army after the final defeat of the Ottoman empire in WWI. The theocrats screamed but he had the guns.

The current situation in Iran seems more similar to me to the one in China just prior to Tiananmen Square. As long as the current regime can restrict the enthusiasm to only a few students it will find that it can kill enough to prevail. But there are a couple of things working against the mullahs there - the age demographic has changed and there is a much higher proportion of youth in Iran than there was in 1979, and radical Islam has morphed from a romantic reaction to entrenched power to becoming an even more oppressive, entrenched power.

22 posted on 07/23/2002 2:19:56 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
Sometimes absurdity is used to highlight truth. In your case, it's simply ignorance.
Do you realize that your post makes no sense? It's clear that you feel the need to be insulting and personal. I'm sure you've read that phrase "NO personal attacks,...." Grow up. Be polite.
23 posted on 07/23/2002 2:27:27 PM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
Bingo, indeed. Try the phrase: "Moderate Scientology." Or: "Non-bloodthirsty Aztec Human Sacrifice Cult." Or: "Non-desrtuctive Satanism." Almost every non-practitioner thinks these religions are retrograde and/or corrupt, and/or irredeemably evil. Why should we automatically confer on Islam moral parity with religions that don't, and haven't for hundreds of years, called for the bloody conquest of non-believers?
24 posted on 07/23/2002 2:37:13 PM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: eno_
To answer your rhetorical question, the answer seems to be because many have been brainwashed into postmodern concepts of "tolerance" for the intolerable.
25 posted on 07/23/2002 2:58:48 PM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
"Yeah. 95% of Muslims make the other 5% look bad."

HA! Very good line.

26 posted on 07/23/2002 3:10:07 PM PDT by ValenB4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: eno_; Billthedrill
Turkey also has got it's fundamentalist troubles. A while back there was a large crisis because Turkey alomst went the wong way. After this event the Welfare party was fobidden, a radical islam political party. But they got things under control now.
27 posted on 07/23/2002 5:36:40 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
OK, seriously: The ululating fat lady on 9/11 was not an anomaly. She is mainstream among Palenstinians. It is the moderates that are the anomaly.

It may come down to proseletizing Moslems and, eventually, turning Islam into a museum-piece, like Zoroastrism.

28 posted on 07/23/2002 5:52:12 PM PDT by eno_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Sorry, calling ignorance ignorance isn't a personal attack.

Your skin is much too thin. You would never last in politics.
29 posted on 07/23/2002 6:43:07 PM PDT by Guillermo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Obviously, there is another "kind" of Islam, just as there's more than one "kind" of Christianity. Extremists in any group, religious or otherwise, give everyone in the group a bad name.

I've done a great deal of reading and thinking about this subject, and it is not obvious to me that there is more than one kind of Islam [nor is it obvious to me that there is more than kind of Christianity].

Jesus:

The Gospel according to
St. Matthew
Chapter 5
The Holy Bible
King James Version 2000

Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:

but I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.

And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloak also.

And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.

Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.

Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbor, and hate thine enemy.

But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;

that ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust.

For if ye love them which love you, what reward have ye? do not even the publicans the same?

And if ye salute your brethren only, what do ye more than others? do not even the publicans so?

Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.

Mohammed:

Medina Suras
The Chapter of Women
[Chapters from the Koran]
The Harvard Classics 1909–14

But if there befalls you grace from God, he would say—as though there were no friendship between you and him—‘O would that I had been with thee to attain this mighty happiness!’ Let those then fight in God’s way who sell this life of the world for the next; and whoso fights in God’s way, then, be he killed or be he victorious, we will give him a mighty hire.

What ails you that ye do not fight in God’s way, and for the weak men and women and children, who say, ‘Lord, bring us out of this town 19 of oppressive folk, and make for us from Thee a patron, and make for us from Thee a help?’

Those who believe fight in the way of God; and those who disbelieve fight in the way of Tâghût; fight ye then against the friends of Satan, verily, Satan’s tricks are weak.

Do ye not see those to whom it is said, ‘Restrain your hands, and be steadfast in prayer and give alms;’ and when it is prescribed for them to fight then a band of them fear men, as though it were the fear of God or a still stronger fear, and they say, ‘O our Lord! why hast thou prescribed for us to fight, couldst thou not let us abide till our near appointed time?’ Say, ‘The enjoyment of this world is but slight, and the next is better for him who fears;’—but they shall not be wronged a straw.

...

Why are ye two parties about the hypocrites, when God hath overturned them for what they earned? Do ye wish to guide those whom God hath led astray? Whoso God hath led astray ye shall not surely find for him a path. They would fain that ye misbelieve as they misbelieve, that ye might be alike; take ye not patrons from among them until they too flee in God’s way; but if they turn their backs, then seize them and kill them wheresoever ye find them, and take from them neither patron nor help,—save those who reach a people betwixt whom and you is an alliance—or who come to you while their bosoms prevent them from fighting you or fighting their own people. But had God pleased He would have given you dominion over them, and they would surely have fought you. But if they retire from you and do not fight you, and offer you peace,—then God hath given you no way against them.

Ye will find others who seek for quarter from you, and quarter from their own people; whenever they return to sedition they shall be overturned therein: but if they retire not from you, nor offer you peace, nor restrain their hands, then seize them and kill them wheresoever ye find them;—over these we have made for you manifest power.


30 posted on 07/23/2002 9:17:49 PM PDT by SlickWillard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SlickWillard
OK-- fine. A religion with over a billion people-- I don't know the exact numbers, and everyone of them is exactly the same, interprets those words you posted exactly the same, and has been killing infidels. Why are there any infidels left since we are outnumbered, I believe? [I'm no defender of Islam. However, I'm old enough to have learned that it's an incredible mistake to paint everyone in a such a large group with the same brush. You've no doubt heard of the dangers of overly broad generalizations? I refuse to ascribe to such generalizations.]
31 posted on 07/24/2002 7:01:48 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SlickWillard
OK-- fine. A religion with over a billion people-- I don't know the exact numbers, and everyone of them is exactly the same, interprets those words you posted exactly the same, and has been killing infidels. Why are there any infidels left since we are outnumbered, I believe? [I'm no defender of Islam. However, I'm old enough to have learned that it's an incredible mistake to paint everyone in a such a large group with the same brush. You've no doubt heard of the dangers of overly broad generalizations? I refuse to ascribe to such generalizations.]
32 posted on 07/24/2002 7:02:17 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Clara Lou
Darn.
33 posted on 07/24/2002 7:02:43 AM PDT by Clara Lou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MJemison
They consider themselves superior to the Arabs.

If you ever call an Iranian an Arab, he will quickly remind you he is a Persian, not an Arab (if you are lucky).

34 posted on 08/18/2002 1:36:51 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie
....he is a Persian, not an Arab

Indeed. Which is precisely how two Iranians who attended my college (some years ago) referred to themselves.

35 posted on 08/20/2002 9:25:47 AM PDT by MJemison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson