Posted on 07/11/2002 10:38:29 AM PDT by a_Turk
If they did so, it was entirely unintentionally. I doubt they even knew his name, much less had some grand plan to advance him into a position of power as their puppet.
Recall that at the time of Gallipoli, the British Expeditionary Force (my grandfather among them) were mired in the muddy trenches of France and Belgium, losing thousands of men for every hundred yards they advanced. Morale was failing. The Russians on the Eastern front had lost a million men, and the Turks were threatening to invade the Caucasus. Grand Duke Nicholas informed the British that he would have to withdraw, which would allow numerous German divisions to be transferred to the Western Front. Churchill and Kitchener came up with a flanking maneuver at Gallipoli that seemed to have a number of points in its favor:
Had it succeeded, had the coordination between land and sea forces been better, had they forced the Dardanelles and proceeded on to Constantinople, it would now be considered a master stroke. This was admitted by the German commanders after the war; success in Asia Minor would have crippled them and shortened the war by years. But thanks to the dithering of the British high command, errors of execution by officers in the field, and the unexpected valor of the Turkish askari, Gallipoli has become a byword for foolish waste of life in war.
Never attribute to conspiracy that which can be explained by stupidity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.