Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Preview your post first before posting is here (A Big Thanks to John Robinson)
6/18/2002 | TLBSHOW

Posted on 06/18/2002 9:34:32 PM PDT by TLBSHOW

Preview your post first before posting?

A big thanks to John for all his hard work for this web site. It is a great idea, the post preview before you post.

Doesn't everyone agree?


TOPICS: Canada; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 3peat; adminmoderatorbdsm; bdsm; bdsmbdsmbdsmbdsm; bitch; brownnosetlb; clicktoaddkeyword; daddy; duh; idiot; iloveyoujohn; imbatman; imtlbineedhelp; keyword; kingsrock; mommy; preview; roshambeux; shaqhasnoskills; sirgawainisbusted; tlbondrugs; whoisyourdaddy; whosyour
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-114 next last
Thanks John Robinson
1 posted on 06/18/2002 9:34:32 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I really like the new feature. Great going.
2 posted on 06/18/2002 9:38:09 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Always had a preview.
3 posted on 06/18/2002 9:38:13 PM PDT by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Yep, that preview is a great feature.... lol. Wonder why we haven't have it before?
4 posted on 06/18/2002 9:39:46 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
What about spell check in the "preview" portion?
5 posted on 06/18/2002 9:42:55 PM PDT by ZDaphne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Preview your post first before posting?

The new feature where articles are posted and others can comment and reply is also a fantastic addition.

6 posted on 06/18/2002 9:43:38 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Well lets test it out!
7 posted on 06/18/2002 9:44:50 PM PDT by US_MilitaryRules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
hmm.... its blue in here
8 posted on 06/18/2002 9:45:12 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I don't fully agree. Why does the "post" version show up exactly as the "preview" even though we have put codes in for paragraphs, italics, etc. The "post" version should reflect our inputted instructions so we can see how it will look in final form. Also, what about spell check in the "preview" stage. So many typos...
9 posted on 06/18/2002 9:45:30 PM PDT by ZDaphne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
What are you talking about?
10 posted on 06/18/2002 9:45:50 PM PDT by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: TLBSHOW
I also like the new thing that you press and the money comes rolling in
12 posted on 06/18/2002 9:47:12 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZDaphne

Good question... You may try and ask John Robinson over on this thread......

13 posted on 06/18/2002 9:47:19 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: US_MilitaryRules
Just did and it worked fine.
14 posted on 06/18/2002 9:47:25 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: ZDaphne
I don't fully agree. Why does the "post" version show up exactly as the "preview" even though we have put codes in for paragraphs, italics, etc. The "post" version should reflect our inputted instructions so we can see how it will look in final form.

The preview version does that.

16 posted on 06/18/2002 9:48:52 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: deport
And that was one of the threads I had not been to yet tonight.
17 posted on 06/18/2002 9:48:55 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: woofie
Yes kinda a power blue.... not gun barrel blue.
18 posted on 06/18/2002 9:49:38 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: deport
Now we can make sure everything works before we post!


19 posted on 06/18/2002 9:49:56 PM PDT by socal_parrot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JoeEveryman
How 'bout them Lakers!

good to see ya!

20 posted on 06/18/2002 9:50:03 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JoeEveryman
LOL!!
21 posted on 06/18/2002 9:50:22 PM PDT by Inspector Harry Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JoeEveryman
I hate those newbies! LOL
22 posted on 06/18/2002 9:51:00 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
Have to check to make sure comment function works. Yep.. works fine..cool idea
23 posted on 06/18/2002 9:51:01 PM PDT by AmerRepb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
What lakers, you mean lakers and the refs?
24 posted on 06/18/2002 9:51:26 PM PDT by Cool Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
I hate those newbies! LOL

Ya talking about me?

25 posted on 06/18/2002 9:52:19 PM PDT by Cool Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JoeEveryman
Correction. Six times. I think it's a record.
26 posted on 06/18/2002 9:52:19 PM PDT by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
It appears that you now have the option to post without previewing it first. Cool! :)
27 posted on 06/18/2002 9:52:29 PM PDT by Quicksilver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW

Darn you better get boogie'n or you'll be late...

28 posted on 06/18/2002 9:52:35 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: Cool Guy
Cool Guy member since May 20th, 1999

BUMP

30 posted on 06/18/2002 9:55:20 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JoeEveryman
Test.........I like the "original comment" box at the bottom.
31 posted on 06/18/2002 9:55:33 PM PDT by Giddyupgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: First_Salute
Always had a preview.

Nope.
Preview has been around a while, but not always.
This is an improvement, despite the introductory glitches and confusion.

32 posted on 06/18/2002 9:55:37 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Is the technology for this available today?
33 posted on 06/18/2002 9:55:58 PM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZDaphne
Look under If you posted your comment as-is, it would look like...

To: ZDaphne

Look under If you post your comment as-is, it would look like...

34 posted on 06/18/2002 9:56:37 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #35 Removed by Moderator

To: hole_n_one
I like the new feature that shows the time and date of our posts.
36 posted on 06/18/2002 9:57:37 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: deport
Over 220 and climbing and I thought I was the only one that noticed. :)
37 posted on 06/18/2002 9:59:18 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
I personally enjoy reporting abuse.
38 posted on 06/18/2002 9:59:31 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Cool feature IF it has a spell checker....

Otherwise, it is kinda useless.

39 posted on 06/18/2002 10:00:12 PM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
I personally enjoy it when you abuse me.
40 posted on 06/18/2002 10:00:57 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
........and now everybody can read the replies other than just the person who made the reply and to whom the reply was being made......

however, the new feature of having all the text in English may take awhile in getting used to.

41 posted on 06/18/2002 10:01:21 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
lolrof
42 posted on 06/18/2002 10:02:58 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator
I personally enjoy it when you abuse me.

Battered Moderator Syndrome

43 posted on 06/18/2002 10:03:18 PM PDT by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
That is nifty. But I like that new ability to log in. How handy!
44 posted on 06/18/2002 10:03:34 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
LMAO
45 posted on 06/18/2002 10:03:57 PM PDT by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hole_n_one
however, the new feature of having all the text in English may take awhile in getting used to.

Oh drat, I thought we could invent the language as we went along.

Oh well....

46 posted on 06/18/2002 10:05:06 PM PDT by Hunble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator; Sir Gawain; Victoria Delsoul
I personally enjoy it when you abuse me.

This could get complicated.

47 posted on 06/18/2002 10:05:25 PM PDT by nunya bidness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: JoeEveryman
and the formating was real bad! Gee those damn newbies!

Editor's note: The following letter was sent by Sen. Fred Thompson, chairman of the Senate Government Affairs Committee to David Barram, head of the General Services Administration. Dear Administrator Barram: As Senate co-sponsor of the Presidential Transition Act of 2000 and chairman of the committee of jurisdiction, I want to express to you my concern about your decision to not go forward with the transition activities contemplated under the Act. I believe that anything less than full transition support runs the risk of damage to our country. First, I want to acknowledge that this is your decision to make under the statute. I am well aware that [White House Chief of Staff John] Podesta has made the position of the White House abundantly clear on numerous occasions. Also, I understand that the Department of Justice will soon render a "formal opinion" on this matter. I am surprised that Mr. Podesta has already announced on CNN that the Department of Justice agrees with his opinion. However, this is not a decision for the White House or the Justice Department in coordination with the White House. The decision is yours. Clearly, these are unusual circumstances and I know you are doing your best, under your interpretation of the law. However, I believe you should grant Secretary [Richard B.] Cheney's request that you authorize his access to transition facilities, services and briefings for two reasons: first, because of the dictates of the statute itself and second, because of the damage that will be done if an orderly transition is hampered any further. As you know, the Presidential Transition Act authorizes you to provide "upon request, to each President-elect and each Vice President-elect for use in connection with his preparations for the assumption of official duties as President or Vice President services and facilities." The act defines the president-elect and the vice president-elect as "such person as are the apparent successful candidates for the office of President and Vice President, respectively, as ascertained by the Administrator following the general elections held to determine the electors of President and Vice President in accordance with title 3, United States Code, sections 1 and 2." Committee and conference reports accompanying this legislation do not shed light on the question of what constitutes "apparent successful candidates." Neither do House floor debates from 1963 elucidate how the administrator might ascertain the "apparent successful candidates." Thus, the certification of the election results in Florida is the only official benchmark we have to ascertain the "apparent successful candidates" in this election. For some time now there has been a growing realization among observers, experts and scholars that presidential transitions are of vital importance to our country and that this period of time is crucial to a successful presidency. Disastrous transitions in more than one recent presidency have sown the seeds of the chaos and serious mistakes of their early years in office. Mind you, these were transitions that began the night of the election. That is why Sen. Lieberman and I sponsored, the Congress enacted and the president signed, the Presidential Transition Act of 2000. The purpose of the act is to encourage early planning of transitions, and it authorized for the first time the actual expenditure of transition funds before the election is even held. Because there are only 73 days from Election Day to inauguration day, transition planning should begin prior to Election Day, and the president-elect must have the ability to move immediately to put a new team in place. . . . Also, even if you are concerned over giving either Mr. Bush or Mr. Gore an advantage at this point, the status quo gives Mr. Bush, the apparent winner, a substantial disadvantage. As was reported in The New York Times Nov. 28, Mr. Gore does not really need a transition office: "Until January 20 he has plenty of office space in the Old Executive Office Building, across the street from the White House, an office in the West Wing; a spacious Vice Presidential residence at the Naval Observatory, where he and his aides have been mapping their strategy. Moreover, Mr. Gore has access to daily intelligence briefings and aides who are already cleared to receive classified material." Also, as his chief of transition stated, he is entirely capable of putting a Cabinet together at a moment's notice. In other words, if Mr. Gore were ultimately to be elected, he would not have been substantially harmed by the current delay. On the other hand, if the apparent winner, Mr. Bush, is ultimately elected, he and his administration will have been substantially disadvantaged, undoubtedly with adverse consequences to our nation. I would ask this administration to consider whether it is reasonable to give Mr. Bush national security briefings but not allow the beginning of FBI background checks on those who would be his national security advisers. During a presidential transition, staff of the president-elect and vice president-elect are responsible for vetting the thousands of prospective Executive Branch appointees for their eventual positions. The necessary vetting normally takes up to four months. Those with direct experience in this process report that the typical FBI security clearance takes three months to complete. Not only will this hamstring the new administration in its new duties, it puts at risk the very security that such background investigations are designed to protect. Facilities are in place now for use by the presidential transition. The taxpayers are paying for office space and equipment that is going unused. This transition payroll is ready for the transition staff. As we both know, this is not a matter of handing over dollar bills to the incoming team. To fail to put these facilities to use is a waste of taxpayer dollars. I therefore call on you to respond positively to Secretary Cheney's request that you authorize his access to the transition facilities, services and briefings provided for in the Presidential Transition Act. WHAT A LETTER***tlb***

48 posted on 06/18/2002 10:07:21 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
I don't, however, like when you add topics. (I told you that was coming!)

What in the world does this post have to do with Mexico? The post preview is worldwide, not just Mexico.

Seriously, don't add topics as jokes. That just makes work for us.

49 posted on 06/18/2002 10:08:31 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness; Admin Moderator
It's that vibrating chair.
50 posted on 06/18/2002 10:08:57 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-114 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson