Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Jackson Bowled Over by Exuberant Fans - "I love these people."
yahoo.com ^ | Jun 14, 2002 - 2:12 PM ET | Paul Majendie

Posted on 06/15/2002 3:26:48 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last
To: waterstraat
Yeah, but you're wrong in saying that Michael Jackson is not a pederast.

When the child molestation charges hit the fan, Jackson trotted out pre-pubescent boys to issues statements to the press, saying that they had slept in the same bed with him, but "nothing happened."

Jackson did not spend $20 million to avoid trial because "nothing happened."

Grown men with normal heterosexual tendencies do not have prepubescent boys to their house for sleep-overs, much less get in the sack with them overnight.



61 posted on 06/15/2002 9:22:51 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
People just love a freak show.

I don't think that this blatant (and likely expensive) charade orchestrated by the Jackson PR agents will carry over to sales. Jackson is a barely recognizable washed-up has-been from 1983, and nothing is going to change that.

62 posted on 06/15/2002 9:28:39 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Lisa Marie Presley is one of the most stunningly beautiful women you could ever hope to lay eyes on.

Really? It sure doesn't come across on tv.

63 posted on 06/15/2002 9:41:25 AM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Yeah, but you're wrong in saying that Michael Jackson is not a pederast.

Sorry, didnt mean to imply that. He may well be a pederast. I certainly would not trust him with any of my children. I just said, he was never convicted of anything. No proof. As things stand at this moment: M.Jackson is rich, famous, white, and over 21.

64 posted on 06/15/2002 9:43:46 AM PDT by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
Enjoy it? No.

Happy about it? No.

But I will honestly report that there can be no true Christians following after M. Jackson.

But you can ally yourself with him and still be a conservative. You just can't be saved from your sins.

He's a Pederast. He's a pervert. And if anyone that wants to love his sin (by swooning over him or buying his records or CD's or supporting him) shows who they love more. I don't want people to go to Hell, just like Jesus Christ did not come into the world to condemn it- it's just a fact that they are going there if they don't believe and repent.

John 3:19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.

65 posted on 06/15/2002 11:57:41 AM PDT by Jonathan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: waterstraat
"For your information, many(most?) men do not care that much how "naive or stupid" a woman is, to get into her pants, as long as her outward appearance is beautiful and buxom, though admittedly artificial. That's a fact. Wake up and deal with it."

Earth to waterstraat.... Your remark refers to many (most?) men wanting to get into a woman's pants. Helloooo, try staying on topic. We're talking about Michael Jackson here. M.J.'s interest in women is NOT, I repeat NOT about getting into a woman's pants. Only a fool would believe otherwise. The only desire he has for women is to look like one.

M.J. is a FREAK with major gender and race identity problems. His fixation is getting into little boys pants. Michael Jackson is one sick muther effer. It's a crying shame that he was able to artificially inseminate that puke of a woman and has two children. I'm sure we'll be reading their Daddy Dearest book in a dozen years or so...
66 posted on 06/15/2002 1:11:56 PM PDT by demkicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jonathan
He's a Pederast.

Well,we can agree on that,anyhow.

67 posted on 06/15/2002 1:32:58 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: plinker's2sense
I stand corrected. One bad experience does not invalidate a nationwide program, obviously.
68 posted on 06/16/2002 1:22:02 AM PDT by pariah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Amazing Randi debunked Geller, right?

Yes, he did, among many other mentalist charlatans.

69 posted on 06/16/2002 6:34:33 AM PDT by Orual
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson