Skip to comments.
'Metal Storm' weapons may replace Crusader
UPI Wire ^
| 5/12/2002 12:01 PM
| UPI Editor At Large
Posted on 05/12/2002 9:24:18 AM PDT by greydog
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
My suggestion for Mideast peace - erect a wall at the green line, let the PLO have everything on the other side, and have several of these babies flying non-stop around the wall.
To appease the UN (and OSHA) though, you would have to put up signs on the PLO side stating "WARNING, YOU ARE LEAVING A CONFINED AREA"
1
posted on
05/12/2002 9:24:18 AM PDT
by
greydog
To: greydog
Didn't I see this stuff in Eraser?
_RIPOFF_
Ari
2
posted on
05/12/2002 9:28:34 AM PDT
by
Krafty123
To: greydog
METAL STORM : Got clogged drains ? Does sinus pressure keep you awake ? Suffer from Performance Anxiety ?
Get METAL STORM . It even does weddings and bar mitzvahs.
batteries sold separately.
To: greydog
"Metal Storm's submachine gun will be capable of firing multiple barrel rapid-fire bursts at 45,000 rounds per minute per barrel."I gotta have one.
To: genefromjersey
Excellent for home defense as well!
5
posted on
05/12/2002 9:37:49 AM PDT
by
Ken H
To: greydog
Rate of fire is not the problem. 6,000 rounds a minute is perfectly adaquate. The problem is ammunition supply.
6
posted on
05/12/2002 9:38:27 AM PDT
by
RLK
To: RLK
We need a "RAY GUN". No ammo to carry. Just a power supply (nuke?).
7
posted on
05/12/2002 9:42:29 AM PDT
by
umgud
To: greydog
How would a weapon like this replace the function of artillery? This seems to be a small caliber weapon.
To: RLK
Exactly!!! One million rounds, at one ounce per round is 62,500 pounds. Now we are back to the weight of the Crusader,and only have one minute of effective fire. Not that I'd believe that 1,000,000 rounds would be fired.
9
posted on
05/12/2002 9:52:48 AM PDT
by
Lokibob
To: greydog
To: greydog
The problem is ammunition supply. That and running out of live enemy to kill.
11
posted on
05/12/2002 9:55:43 AM PDT
by
aculeus
To: greydog
The system's unprecedented firing capabilities can lay down a continuous 50-meter-wide carpet of grenades for about two miles, firing all its grenades simultaneously with a five-yard separation on impact.
So much for the trend toward precision, guided munitions.
Imagine children playing or farmers farming or walkers walking amidst the dud and unexploded munitions, ten, twenty, thirty years later. And losing limbs.
To: Fishing-guy
How would a weapon like this replace the function of artillery? This seems to be a small caliber weapon. It won't replace artillery.
I like that Crusader system. I hope that Republican Representative J.C. Watts prevails in this dispute and that the Crusader system is built.
Not all of our future enemies will be 3rd or 4th World powers such as Afghanistan or Somalia. The day may well come when the US faces a real power hostile to our country (and don't think that it can't happen either, as history is full of nothing but shifting alliances, and thousands of wars). Whether it be China or Russia or some other power, such as maybe an alliance of the world's muslim nations, we may very well need the weapons to win battles on battlefields. Air power alone may not be enough to do the job. Small arms won't win, either, if the enemy can defend against these or overwhelm them.
I think we're making a huge strategic mistake to the degree our country, as a matter of policy, abandons artillery, tanks, and other necessities of winning wars.
13
posted on
05/12/2002 9:56:39 AM PDT
by
Jay W
To: Fishing-guy
How would a weapon like this replace the function of artillery? This seems to be a small caliber weapon.
-----------------------
It is, by necessity. Can you imagine a gun that would fire 45,000 155 mm howitzer shells a minute? The weight of ammunition require to run the thing for ten seconds would be approximately the weight of New York. Somebody has their head up their behind on this concept.
14
posted on
05/12/2002 9:56:44 AM PDT
by
RLK
To: michigander
Thanks, I thought I saw some threads on this before.
To: greydog
A handy tool for a space based anti-missile system. Also interesting area defense system for naval vessels. I wonder what the projectile speed is?
16
posted on
05/12/2002 10:02:46 AM PDT
by
Ranger
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I was quite sure I had too. Thank goodness for the search function.
Information about Crusader
To: RLK
You can always fire slower. Speed can be electronically controled.
To: Jay W
The Crusader has got to be able to get into the fight. An interesting parallel israilroad-based artillery which was useful in WWI but obsolete by WWII.
19
posted on
05/12/2002 10:08:20 AM PDT
by
Ranger
To: Fishing-guy
I'm thinking the key word is mobility.
An 80 ton cannon can't get to where it needs to be in order to acquire its target quickly enough.
A bomber or fighter can.
The American 21st Century blitzkrieg will make der Schickelgruber's move across Europe seem cumbersome and slow.
20
posted on
05/12/2002 10:08:59 AM PDT
by
jwfiv
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson