Skip to comments.
Routine Traffic Stop Leads to 8-Hour Standoff, Shooting of 69-Year-Old Driver
TBO.com ^
| 3/26/02
Posted on 03/26/2002 9:25:28 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-106 next last
To: Travis McGee
LOL, snort. It's really funny if I snort.
That was a one snorter. Good old Jethro.
To: Cap'n Crunch
I just realize you are an LEO...maybe these questions are in your line of expertise...
What would be the reasoning that allows a "fleeing" person to obtain safe harbor ?
Would it not be in the best interest of the LEOs and public to isolate the fleeing person away from possible weapons and innocent persons(future hostages) ?
I realize we don't have all the details on this case and the answers are not that easy, but I am interested. It seems in quite a few of these cases turn into a barricade situation and the ultimate death of parties on either side.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Sometimes they're paranoid, sometimes they're out to get 'em.
63
posted on
03/27/2002 11:30:46 AM PST
by
TC Rider
To: Cap'n Crunch
I think that alot of these people should not be out in society, living on their own because they are not capable of doing so.IN the 70's and 80's there was an "advocate" movement for the mentally ill which effectively made it impossible to have someone committed against their will. The general argument was that involuntary committment was a violation of due process and the 4th Amendment. Hundreds of state mental hospitals were closed in the 80's.
So now we have the "homeless" (40 percent of whom are mentally ill) and examples like Andrea Yates and this poor codger, none of whom can be committed without extreme legal measures. Sometimes they become a nuisance to others, and sometimes murderers and worse.
The core problem here is the gross insistence by liberals that people who cannot think or act rationally be able to exercise their "due process rights." And here we have yet another sad testament to that "freedom."
64
posted on
03/27/2002 11:36:15 AM PST
by
angkor
To: Thumper1960
security forces were obliged to use whatever force necessary to subdue the suspect. I think they "subdued" him...
To: Poohbah
As long as we let mentally ill people run around loose, it'll keep happeningPrecisely. Those cops should be in a high security prison for the criminally insane, not running around our streets executing senior citizens for barricading themselves in their homes.
To: in the Arena
Well, one thing I can tell you about police pursuits, the public doesn't like them and police dept.'s are changing their policies regarding pursuits.
For instance, our own pursuit policy recently changed. They may as well take the flashers and siren off our our cruisers. If the guy is not known to be a mass murderer we don't pursue. And it's getting to be like that nationwide.
Wait until everybody finds out that the police wont chase you if you run. Nobody will be pulling over. Then, the dept. expects the officer who attempted to stop the car to do the follow up investigation. It ain't worth it. Alot of guys are just not going to stop cars.
To: RGSpincich
You're right, there is a lot more. Despite numerous warnings, this senior citizen didn't clean up his yard!
To: Cap'n Crunch
Wait until everybody finds out that the police wont chase you if you run. Nobody will be pulling over. Kind of like creating a "police free" zone...similar if not the same as "gun free" zones we have in some public areas...
When criminals know you have no recourse nothing will stop them.
Then, the dept. expects the officer who attempted to stop the car to do the follow up investigation. It ain't worth it. Alot of guys are just not going to stop cars
Although I don't agree with the result, I wouldn't blame them. Following up might just find yourself walking into an ambush...
To: wattsmag2
He was a 69 yr old man with no reported history of violence who barricaded himself in his home, armed with a sword. He could have been peacefully apprehended by WAITING. But no! Your Masters didn't have the intelligence to do anything more than pull the trigger as early and often as possible. Gas? An armored car? Fully automatic military weapons? Opening up on him in tune with the cheering of his neighbours? All to dispatch a sr. citizen allegedly armed with an alleged "sword" who had committed the sin of "DRIVING TOO SLOW". It's sickening.
To: Cap'n Crunch
Ellie Mae can still whip his butt though.
To: uncbob;valg;goldylight
What was the speed limit?
To: Travis McGee
Ha! I got a ten spot on Granny!
To: in the Arena, angkor
The inmates are running the asylum. Pretty soon they'll be chasing us.
Sounds like NWO rules: you will be terminated if you do not display maximum submission to authority at all times.
To: Cap'n Crunch
Ellie Mae is HOT, too bad she has a thing for chimpanzees.
To: Cap'n Crunch
Yeah, I know Old Joe,A Beantown cop, yes? If not, there are many still needing attention.
77
posted on
03/27/2002 4:13:06 PM PST
by
angkor
To: Travis McGee
LOL, reminds me of when we went to an Indians baseball game. In between innings on the scoreboard they had a question posted: 'Ginger or Mary Ann?' Then it showed the Indians players giving their answers.
Ginger won but it was closer than I thought it was going to be.
To: angkor
Old Joe, the various mental patients wandering the streets. He's in every city. He's like a crack house, every time one goes down 10 others pop up to take his place.
:-)
To: valg
It will go on as long as the dumbmasses put up with it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-106 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson