Posted on 03/23/2002 3:55:50 PM PST by Pokey78
RECORDS of Osama Bin Laden’s calls from his satellite phone reveal Britain was at the heart of the terrorist’s planning for his worldwide campaign of murder and destruction. Bin Laden and his most senior lieutenants made more than 260 calls from their base in Afghanistan to 27 numbers in Britain. They included suspected terrorist agents, sympathisers and companies. Some were prearranged calls to contacts using public pay phones. The records, obtained by The Sunday Times, show that the terrorist leader made more calls to Britain than any other country in the two years that he used the phone. He stopped using it two months after members of his Al-Qaeda terror network bombed two American embassies in east Africa in August 1998. He believed that the Americans were tracking his movements through the phone. Two of the men contacted by Bin Laden in Britain — Khaled al Fawwaz and Ibrahim Eidarous — are now in prison awaiting extradition to the United States for their part in the embassy bombings, which killed 224 and injured thousands. However, another senior terrorist suspect, Mustafa Nazar, is still on the loose. He spent up to two years in Dollis Hill, north London, recruiting for Al-Qaeda. A key figure in Bin Laden’s terror training camps, he left Britain in 1998 and was last seen in Afghanistan fighting alongside the Taliban. The telephone records have come to light following the trial last year of four Al-Qaeda terrorists who planned and carried out the bombing of the two American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. According to trial documents, the telephone was bought in 1996 with the help of Dr Saad al Fagih, 45, a bearded surgeon who heads the London-based Movement for Islamic Reform in Arabia. This fundamentalist Muslim group is dedicated to the overthrow of the Saudi Arabian government but is not part of Al-Qaeda. Al Fagih, who has been regularly used by the BBC as an expert on Bin Laden, has in the past explained that Muslim scholars said the killing of civilians, including children, was allowed by the Koran as “collateral damage” in the holy war. It was al Fagih’s credit card which was used to help to buy the £10,500 Compact-M satellite phone in the United States and it was shipped to his home in north London, according to American court documents. His credit card was also used to buy more than 3,000 minutes of pre-paid airtime. Last week al Fagih, who has not been arrested or charged in connection with any of these actions, said: “I am willing to speak to the authorities if they ask me about this or any other issue, but not to the press.” For two years Bin Laden and his military commander, Muhammad Atef, used the phone to direct Al-Qaeda’s worldwide operations. More than 200 calls were made to the London home and mobile phone of al Fawwaz. Calls were also made to two public phone boxes in December 1996 and May 1997. One was on a street corner outside Willesden library in north London and another was close by, only a few minutes’ walk from al Fawwaz’s home. Other calls were made to the offices of companies for which al Fawwaz worked. Al Fawwaz, who lived in Kenya from 1993-94 before moving to London, was head of a group called the Advice and Reformation Committee, based in Queen’s Park, northwest London, which has been described by the FBI as a front organisation for Bin Laden. Al Fawwaz kept a note of the sat-phone number in his address book under the name of Atef. But according to American court documents the phone was regularly used by Bin Laden. Another recipient of calls from Afghanistan was Eidarous, 44, who lived in Waldo Road, not far from al Fawwaz and the call boxes. In December 1996 a call was made to the home of Mohammed Hamed, a retired journalist. Hamed, who lives in a semi-detached house in a quiet street in Surbiton, Surrey, does not recall the occasion. He has indirect links to Afghanistan but there is no obvious reason why he should receive a call from Bin Laden’s phone. Hamed said his brother, Mostafa Hamed, had fought for the mujaheddin in Afghanistan against the Russians until 1990 and stayed in Afghanistan to work as a journalist. Hamed had not heard from him for more than a year. In January 1998 a brief call was also made to the home of Salem Azzam, a retired diplomat from Egypt who lives in a smart three-storey maisonette near Edgware Road in London. Azzam has no connection to terrorism; he is the great uncle of Ayman al-Zawahiri, who is widely regarded as the chief organiser of Al-Qaeda and Bin Laden’s right-hand man. The telephone records also suggest that Bin Laden and al Fawwaz co-ordinated the press statements over the religious fatwah urging all Muslims to kill Americans, including civilians, anywhere in the world. The fatwah was later issued to London-based Arab newspapers including Al-Quds, Al-Hayat and a news agency. While some of the calls went to known terrorists, others were made to now untraceable recipients. One, for example, was to a house on an estate in Wandsworth, south London, which has been occupied by a family of Asian origin since 1996. Last week its occupant said he knew nothing about the call. “It could be a mistake,” said Tanzeel Ahmed. Other calls are more difficult to fathom, perhaps being the result of wrong numbers or misconnections. One three-minute call in December 1996 went to a ground-floor council flat in Erith, Kent. Its occupant, Michelle Urquhart, who lives with her three children, last week had no idea why her phone number should crop up on Bin Laden’s sat-phone. “I have no connection with these people and no recollection of a call being made to this property,” she said. After the United Kingdom, the country Bin Laden called most frequently was Yemen, where Al-Qaeda terrorists bombed the destroyer USS Cole, killing 17 American sailors, in October 2000. It received more than 200 calls on the sat-phone. Yemen is now the subject of an American security operation and its government is co-operating to ensure that support for Al-Qaeda is broken. Other calls were made to Sudan (131), where Bin Laden was based until 1996. There were also 106 calls to Iran, described earlier this year by President George W Bush as one of the “axis of evil” nations. Others include Azerbaijan (67), Pakistan (59) and Saudi Arabia (57). Six calls to America are recorded and 13 appear to have been made to a telephone on a ship in the Indian Ocean. Six were made to Italy, where police earlier this year uncovered an Al-Qaeda cell planning a poison gas attack on the American embassy, four to Malaysia and two to Senegal. The most surprising omission is Iraq, with not a single call recorded. Its president, Saddam Hussein, is now being threatened with military action by America because of its alleged links with Al-Qaeda. The absence of calls to Iraq may, however, simply indicate particular caution: Bin Laden suspected his calls were being traced and he is believed to have abandoned using the sat-phone when he thought President Clinton had used it to target a cruise missile attack against one of his bases. As for the sat-phone, calls to its number, 00873 682 505 331, are now met with the message: “The mobile number you are trying to contact cannot be reached; please try again later.” Additional reporting: Will Iredale, John Elliott and Judith O’Reilly
I'd be willing to say it is plausible that not every bin Laden call got translated and analyzed, but sat phones move a relatively puny quantity of bits copmared to the NSA's capabilities, and only big shots use them. We HAD to have some idea what bin Laden was planning.
Now what are the implications of THAT?
Betcha she knows perfectly well. The IRA is known to have trained with various Islamic radical groups, and I would suspect that Michelle has a little bit more going than she's talking about...
Well now it is officially linked to Al-Qaeda.
Are the people who wrote this story totally naive, or is it supposed to be tongue-in-cheek? All these amazing coincidences of people who received phone calls, and don't know a thing about it. Must have been wrong numbers, over and over again. Yup.
The ones allegedly involved, were virtually executed, sumarily, by police at the siege of Sydney Street. Some years reviously, French anarchists were infiltrated and one was bought off.English working class men were sentenced to long terms of imprisonment when they made a bomb at his encouragement. This was called the Walsall conspiracy. The power of the cunning Scotland Yard and British police now seem hamstrung. Why?
The weapon that now protects the latter day terrorists is Political correctness and so-called anti-hate laws.
I have heard a Marxist Socialist litany proclaimed at a meeting of Family History enthusiasts (East of London FHS) ten years ago. Recently to my dismay ,I read on pages 1120-1, of a book: London, by an Edward Rutherfurd (Ballantyne Books 1998). As part of the book, he draws on almost exactly the litany repeated by a functionary, who lectured at that Romford meeting years ago.
It is to the effect that always London has had immigration(true). He compares Romans,Normans, Saxons, Jews, Irish as being quite the same as the "new" Londoners. The disturbing thing is that, even a novelist repeats almost word for word, that which some functionary of local government has put out. Never mind "Carry on London" - it should be b****y well "wake" up. These people are not Britons and never will be.
Because it is the country we are least likely to carpet bomb for harboring terrorists.
I have heard there are more mosques in London than Churches. Ever wonder why the BBC is so Pro-Palestinian?
Nice find r/c.You never know what you'll find when you dig in the sand.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.