Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NRA Board Nominees (CARA supporters)
Eco-logic Online at Freedom.org ^ | March 11, 2002 | N/A

Posted on 03/13/2002 10:17:59 AM PST by madfly

NRA Board Nominees

The staff of the NRA will not release contact information for the nominees so members can ask them what their position is on CARA - the "Confiscation and Relocation Act."

Here follows the list of nominees, with a request that anyone who knows any of these individuals, please contact them and ask what their position is.

Then share that information with us so we can publish the information before members submit their ballot early in April.

Sanford M. Abrams
Owings Mills, MD
Thomas P. Arvas
Albuguerque, NM
(supports CARA)
Michele Bartinus
Centerville, IA
David E. Bennett III
Albuquerque, NM
Ron L. Carlisle
Kopperl, TX
J. William Carter
Sterling, VA
Patricia A. Clark
Newtown, CT
Allan D. Cors
McClean, VA
David G. Coy
John L. Cushman
Patchogue, NY
(Opposes CARA)
H.T. Davison
Bryan, TX
(Opposes CARA)
Donn C. DiBiasio
Providence, RI
Diana M. Dunigan
Brunswick, GA
(Opposes CARA)
Philip Hemphill
Clinton, MS
(Opposes CARA)
Roy Innis
New York, NY
David C. Jones
Ellisville, MO
Opposes CARA
Herbert A. Lanford, Jr.
Columbia, SC
John Milius
Los Angeles, CA
David A. Oliver
Wildwood, MO
(Opposes CARA)
Ernie Padgette
Chantilly, VA
(Opposes CARA)
Peter J. Printz
Hamilton, MT
(Opposes CARA)
Todd J. Rathner
Tucson, AZ
(Opposes CARA)
Kayne B. Robinson
Des Moines, IA
(Opposes CARA)
Carl T. Rowan, Jr.
San Mateo, CA
Harold W. Schroeder
Lancaster, NY
(Opposes CARA)
John C. Sigler
Dover, DE
John J. Thompson
Wilmington, DE
Howard J. Walter
Flat Rock, NC
(Opposes CARA)
Robert J. Wos
North Royalton, OH

If anyone knows how to contact these individuals, or if you know how they stand on CARA, please use the "comment" link below to share the information with our readers. Any information you share must be accompanied by your name, email, and phone number.








MECRI

In Maine, we are the voice for private property rights. See what's happening in the Northern Forests.  





Your ad here!

Click this link to place your ad automatically. Only $15 gets you nearly 100,000 page views.  




Campaign

Comment on this article


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cara; landgrab; nra
Call for freepers to help complete this list.
1 posted on 03/13/2002 10:17:59 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marsh2; dixiechick2000; Helen; Mama_Bear; poet; Grampa Dave; doug from upland; WolfsView...
Pinging to help complete this list of NRA nominees and where they stand on CARA.
2 posted on 03/13/2002 10:19:59 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
BUMP
3 posted on 03/13/2002 10:20:39 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madfly; carry okie
Thanks for finding this data and posting it for us!

This outrageous, The staff of the NRA will not release contact information for the nominees so members can ask them what their position is on CARA - the "Confiscation and Relocation Act."

Until the NRA is totally honest about these possible hidden CARA agenda carriers/pushers, they can forget about any donation from me! This is like having covert Planned Parenthood members on a board of a Pro Life group against abortions!

Thanks to the power of the internet and Free Republic, we can drag anyone out in the light of day including those, who for the most part are conservative but may have some really bad DNA in hidden in their genes!

4 posted on 03/13/2002 10:25:49 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Documentary Lady
Ping
5 posted on 03/13/2002 10:39:43 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Here is something from a Nov. thread.

Here are a few of the "Heroes and Zeroes" among the NRA Board of Directors. THANK the Heroes and SPANK the Zeroes!!! Remember them next time they are up for reelection to the NRA Board!

THANK the following NRA Directors for leading the charge against CARA and for gun rights and property rights:

HEROES:

U S Senator and NRA Director Larry Craig of Idaho - Led the charge on Thursday and Friday, when CARA was debated in committees.

U S Representative and NRA Director Barbara Cubin of Wyoming - had a commitment in Wyoming and could not attend, but sent word that she was opposed to CARA and was quoted by Directors during debate.

Director John Cushman of New York - pointed out that the words "sportsmen" and "hunting" are not even mentioned in CARA, and questioned it's benefit to gun owners.

NRA Second Vice President Sandra Froman of Arizona - was unable to attend, but called in and made it clear that CARA has massive grassroots opposition among the broad base of NRA members.

Director Susan Howard of Texas - spoke at length against CARA, stating "Texas is nearly all private property, and thank goodness for that!"

Director Dave Keene of Virginia - CHAMPION. With Wayne Ross, he proposed striking out the resolution language that claimed CARA actually helped property owners. Keene and Ross carried the day by a vote of 35 to 10.

U S Senator Don Nickles of Oklahoma - is not a Board member and did not attend the meeting. However, he was cited as a prominent opponent. Nickles has given the best response of all when asked about CARA's claims to having "property rights protections." He said they were "a head fake!"

Director Grover Norquist of Washington, DC - Norquist pointed out that most conservative organizations are strongly opposed to CARA, and that the NRA is even becoming isolated among gun owner and hunting groups. Several of the NRA's own state affiliates have come out against the Land Grab.

Director Ted Nugent of Michigan - was not present, but made his opposition to the Land Grab known publicly ahead of the meeting. In his own words, the Motor City Madman and rock and roll legend simply said, "CARA SUX!"

Director Jay Printz of Montana - announced ahead of meeting that he did not support CARA, and helped to organize opposition.

NRA First Vice President Kayne Robinson of Iowa - chaired the meeting on Saturday ( NRA President Charleton Heston was not present ). He was fair and even handed, but made it clear that he does not support the CARA Land Grab.

Director Wayne Ross of Alaska - CHAMPION. Led the charge for freedom at the full Board meeting on Saturday, delivering a lengthy speech against the NRA's involvement in a massive, unprecedented land acquisition buying spree like CARA. Worked with Director Dave Keene to strip out pro-CARA language from the resolution.

Director Bruce Stern of Connecticut - Quote of the Day: Stern said that the resolution endorsing CARA was "semi-congealed pudding." He added that Directors should not "sign a document before it is filled in" because CARA keeps changing and adding more pork as it moves through the legislative process.

Director Harry Thomas of Ohio - asked several times about CARA's fire hose of guaranteed billions to condemn private land.

ZEROES - supported CARA, the Pork Barrel Land Grab - over one billion dollars per year to condemn private property (in alphabetical order):

Director Thomas Arvas of New Mexico - Chairman of the Wildlife Committee, spoke in favor of a strong endorsement for CARA.

NRA Institute for Legislative Action Chief Lobbyist Jim Baker - demonstrated nothing but contempt for CARA opponents. The NRA's top lobbyist is definitely out of touch with grassroots membership.

Director Mike Lee of Maine - suggested that members should "have trust and confidence in the staff." Let's see now, that's the same staff that got NRA into this CARA mess in the first place! No way!

Director Jim Nicholson - is fortunate to live in Texas, which is 98% private land. It will not be 98% private for much longer if CARA is approved - careful! You may get what you ask for!

Director James Porter - thinks CARA is great, but also said "this issue is screwed up - we have got to find a way out of this."

NRA staff member Susan Lamson - authored several letters to Congressmen and Senators over the past three years in support of the CARA Land Grab, and testified in person as well.

***The Worst*** Director Harold Volkmer of Missouri - was the Number One CARA supporter on Saturday, speaking in favor of it several times. Volkmer was a Congressman for nearly twenty years, and eventually gained a reputation for being out of touch with constituents. He was finally booted out of office in 1996 by Missouri constituents who had had enough. Perhaps it is time for NRA members to do the same, and send Volkmer packing!

Director J D Williams of Texas - claimed repeatedly that CARA will not lead to condemnation of private property, said it would all be "willing sellers." Sure, Mr. Williams! "Willing sellers" after endangered species devalue your land, government agencies threaten your access, and environmental extremists slap you with lawsuits!!! WAKE UP !

U S Representative and NRA Director Don Young of Alaska - the congressional sponsor of CARA. Young did not anticipate that there would be a floor fight on Saturday, and so left the NRA Board meeting a day early, on Friday. He was sure surprised upon discovering that his resolution had been sliced and diced!

Saturday's Board resolution, which scaled back but did not yet eliminate NRA's misguided support for CARA, is another small victory for the forces of freedom - thank those who were with us, educate the rest, and keep fighting.

 


6 posted on 03/13/2002 10:49:55 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Drag 'em out into the light of day, Gramps!

2nd Amendment bump!

7 posted on 03/13/2002 10:51:29 AM PST by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Post #5 is from these two threads from a Nov. 8th Sierra Times Article by Mike Hardiman.

Here are the FReepublic links to those threads:

Some NRA Directors lead charge against CARA Land Grab

NRA: Heroes and Zeroes


8 posted on 03/13/2002 11:02:49 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
BUMP
9 posted on 03/13/2002 11:04:39 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Bump. Drag the rest out. Bump
10 posted on 03/13/2002 11:20:13 AM PST by Maelstrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Maelstrom
yeah,lol

BUMP

11 posted on 03/13/2002 11:23:24 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: madfly
NRA ballot came out in the Feb. issue. Received in Jan. I suspect 90% of ballots already mailed in.

When I try to locate someone, I check the phone book. Failing that? Polk City Directory. Nowadays? Internet.

12 posted on 03/13/2002 11:53:33 AM PST by donozark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
I dropped out of NRA in 1999 because I'd had enough of their shenanigans.

Now, every year they send me a free membership so that they won't have to admit that they're losing old members. - What a joke!

13 posted on 03/13/2002 6:15:24 PM PST by editor-surveyor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Get real. They are quite articulate in their position. They get money for state fish and game out of this. PERIOD. Don't expect them to fight battles outside of their charter.

The Facts About NRA and CARA

"...NRA would not attach its name and support to a bill if its effect was to infringe upon any of our members' Constitutional rights...."  

 

 

- - xxxxx
 
In July, the House Resources Committee favorably reported H.R. 701, the Conservation and Reinvestment Act known as CARA. Because the bill is expected to be brought to the House of Representatives for a vote sometime in the Fall, the NRA has received inquiries regarding its position on H.R. 701, specifically with respect to the perceived impacts of CARA upon private property owners. We are happy to set the record straight regarding NRA support of CARA so that our members will be informed of NRA's views.

NRA has supported CARA since it was first introduced in 1998 by Congressman Don Young (R-Alaska). All national conservation and hunting organizations are on record in support of CARA. NRA's support for CARA is tied to Title III, which provides additional funds to state fish and wildlife agencies through a trust account Congressionally established in the 1930's with the strong backing of sportsmen. The Pittman-Robertson trust account assists states in conserving and restoring wildlife and habitat.

The issue over CARA that has been brought to NRA's attention, however, is over Title II, which creates a land acquisition trust account for the federal land management agencies. Property rights groups claim that Title II will give the federal government unfettered powers to seize property owned by our citizens, and they have rallied grassroots efforts to have NRA withdraw its support for CARA.

We are very sensitive to the fears expressed by some of our members that CARA is a threat to private property owners. Congressman Young has endeavored to construct Title II in a manner that addresses and alleviates these fears. However, we doubt that any private property protections built into CARA will satisfy those of our citizens who oppose any further land acquisition and expansion of the federal estate.

In that context, while we have waged many battles over land acquisition and land transfer/exchange proposals when such actions pose a threat to hunting opportunities, the NRA has no position with respect to federal land acquisition, per se, due to our single issue charter. Rest assured that NRA would not attach its name and support to a bill if its effect was to infringe upon any of our members' Constitutional rights.

Again, our support for CARA is tied to Title III, which is one title of ten in the bill. On the other hand, property-rights groups oppose a different title of the ten. Professional observers understand the legislative process is one of debate and amendments, and concerned individuals would be better served by an action plan to amend the bill rather than ad hominem attacks on groups such as the NRA who are simply fulfilling their mandate to serve their own constituencies. We suggest you inquire of those who are provoking these attacks what their legislative plan of action may be.

The contact information for the individual responsible for launching this irresponsible diversion, Mr. J. Zane Walley, is (505) 653-4024; e-mail : frc@pvtnetworks.net, and we suggest you contact him posthaste. "Write Your Reps" tool at NRAILA.org-->


Related Stories...
More Info About Federal Issues
Nov. 2001 - NRA Board Issues Policy Statement on CARA
NRA-ILA's Baker Hails Passage of Pittman-Robertson Reform Bill
Pittman-Robertson Reform Bill Introduced in the Senate
NRA Testifies on Pittman-Robertson Reform Bill

14 posted on 03/13/2002 6:24:11 PM PST by VA Advogado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: donozark
This is G o o g l e's cache of http://www.tsra.com/nra_elections.htm.
G o o g l e's cache is the snapshot that we took of the page as we crawled the web.
The page may have changed since that time. Click here for the current page without highlighting.


Google is not affiliated with the authors of this page nor responsible for its content.
These search terms have been highlighted:  nra  elections  2002 

NRA Elections

NRA Elections

The ballot package will be in the February issue of the Official Journals.  It will contain a ballot to elect the directors, along with their biographical sketches.  Also included will be the ballot for a Proposed Bylaw Amendment, as well as the accompanying statements in support and opposition to the Amendment.

Printing, binding and mailing of the American Rifleman, American Hunter, and America's 1st Freedom ballot issues started on January 6, 2002 and will be completed by January 17, 2002.

The following information may be of help to NRA members.

  1. Voting members will receive their 2002 ballot packages in their February American Rifleman, American Hunter, and America's 1st Freedom.  Magazine distribution is planned to be completed by January 17, 2002.  The ballots should arrive in the hands of the voting members during the last two weeks of January.
  2. The deadline for member of record (the last day you can become a voting member for this election cycle) is March 8, 2002.  This is established by NRA Bylaws as 50 days prior to the Annual Meeting of Members.
  3. The deadline for completed ballots to be received by the accounting firm (Deloitte & Touche) is April 7, 2002.  Since this is Sunday, the last mail pickup will be Monday, April 8.
  4. The following voting members will receive the ballots by first class mail:

    Those who normally don't receive a magazine,
    Those who live in Hawaii
    Those who have an APO, FPO or U>S. Possessions address
    Those who become voting members between first address selection and March 8, 2002

  5. There will be two first class mail drops, with the first occurring at the end of January and the second being dropped on March 9, 2002.

15 posted on 03/14/2002 6:43:54 AM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Do you actually know any NRA members that haven't mailed their completed ballots in already? The dice have been rolled...
16 posted on 03/14/2002 8:44:11 AM PST by donozark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson