Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gritty
I heard one commentator today say that many intelligence experts consider this as a move to sever the West's control over the flow of oil. I know many here think that China would not consider damaging its largest trading partner. Perhaps they should consider whether China would think it in their national interest to break the West's control over oil.
3 posted on 09/15/2001 9:52:07 AM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: independentmind
I heard one commentator today say that many intelligence experts consider this as a move to sever the West's control over the flow of oil.

We don't control it. We are held up to ransom by it. OPEC wants the West to consume oil today like Britain wanted China to consume opium in the 19th Century. It's time we controlled the "flow of oil".

4 posted on 09/15/2001 10:07:11 AM PDT by Kennard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: independentmind, Black Jade, j_accuse, The Kitten, ALOHA RONNIE, backhoe, flamefront
In all of this -- I sure am glad China CONTROLS THE PANAMA CANAL...yes, isn't that 50 year contract with Whampoa-Hutchison so nice.....
7 posted on 09/15/2001 10:20:22 AM PDT by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: independentmind
I know many here think that China would not consider damaging its largest trading partner.

China could care less about US trade. All it cares about is world dominance.

35 posted on 09/16/2001 8:42:00 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson