Posted on 01/26/2024 4:51:15 PM PST by TLI
§316. Detail of members of Army National Guard for rifle instruction of civilians
The President may detail officers and noncommissioned officers of the Army National Guard to duty as instructors at rifle ranges for the training of civilians in the use of military arms.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2021-title32/html/USCODE-2021-title32.htm
§324. Discharge of officers; termination of appointment
(a) An officer of the National Guard shall be discharged when—
(1) he becomes 64 years of age; or
(2) his Federal recognition is withdrawn.
The official who would be authorized to appoint him shall give him a discharge certificate.
(b) Subject to subsection (a), the appointment of an officer of the National Guard may be terminated or vacated as provided by the laws of the State of whose National Guard he is a member, or by the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or the District of Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands, of whose National Guard he is a member.
(c) Notwithstanding subsection (a)(1), an officer of the National Guard serving as a chaplain, medical officer, dental officer, nurse, veterinarian, Medical Service Corps officer, or biomedical sciences officer may be retained, with the officer’s consent, until the date on which the officer becomes 68 years of age.
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/USCODE-2021-title32/html/USCODE-2021-title32.htm
I’m still looking for the if voting mattered it would be illegal monologue. Enjoy this now:
“If voting changed anything, it would be illegal.”
https://www.azquotes.com/author/2470-George_Carlin/tag/voting
AG Paxton letter of 1/26/24
Note this part:
“
Instead, you fixate on a recent order from the Supreme Court of the United States. As you know,
that unsigned order supplied no rationale for vacating a Fifth Circuit injunction. It may be that the
Supreme Court was misled by allegations levelled by your federal agency, and which you repeated
in your January 14th letter to our office. In any event, the Court’s order certainly said nothing
about access to Shelby Park, which even the federal government’s lawyers acknowledged is “not
presented” in that ongoing litigation. See Second Supplemental Memorandum at 5, DHS v. Texas,
No. 23A607 (Jan. 15, 2024).”
The Supreme Court has opened a can of worms!
Traitors to this Country!
There needs to be consideration of removal to this Court!
The court ruled that the white house MAY remove the razor wire, not that they MUST remove the wire. Which means the Feds are free to take it down and TX can follow three feet behind and put it back up.
...YET!
WHERE ARE THE WOLVERINES WHEN THEY’RE NEEDED??
how soon before biden confiscates their bank accounts? (Trudeau did it in canada and birds of a feather flock together they say)
Trucker Convoy Joins Texas in DEFIANCE of Supreme Court!
SCOTUS didn’t even make a ruling or comments...just an order voiding a lower court stay.
It was actually the Canadian Banks that froze the accounts. Also, the regulatory agencies targeted the truckers for “inspection”. And the insurance companies cancelled their coverage.
In the USA, people have already been targeted by these tactics.
the court ruled that the Biden administration did have the right to remove razor wire
No, they said the Border patrol could cut the razor wire.
Yeah, this article being a bit over-dramatic...the SCOTUS just said that DHS can remove razor wire in DHS controlled areas...they didn’t say anything about Texas keeping DHS out of certain areas (the Eagle Pass park) or Texas putting up new wire as fast as DHS removes it.
Even less than that...the SCOTUS ruled that *the lower court* cannot pre-emptively block CBP from cutting the wire, without saying why.
pretty sure that Trudeau ordered banks to do so- citing the ‘Emergencies Act’ as his excuse for doing so
“Trudeau uses Emergencies Act to freeze private bank accounts in latest attack on Freedom Convoy”
““Second, the government is issuing an order, with immediate effect, under the Emergencies Act, authorizing Canadian financial institutions to temporarily cease providing financial services where the institution suspect an account is being used to further the illegal blockade and occupation,””
Isbitbin border patrol job description to remove state placed razor wire? Those are union jobs and if it ain’t in the job description a wise officer should file a grievance.
No, the strict legality was that the Banks were “authorized”. They actually made the decisions.
After the fact, Trudeau and the Liberal gov’t tried to distance themselves from the account freezes, and put the responsibility on the Banks.
But it is all BS. The Banks knew that they could not refuse. The only ones who did were provincial credit unions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.