Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Praises Judge, Claims 80 Percent of Case Is Over
Newsmax ^ | October 3, 2023 | Mark Swanson

Posted on 10/03/2023 6:17:19 AM PDT by Timber Rattler

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: tophat9000

“80 % is not 100% and this Judge already made some really bad rulings remember last fri”

But that 80% gives Trump’s attorneys ammo for the other 20%. Judge doesn’t want this case and is looking for a way to get out of it.


21 posted on 10/03/2023 6:55:24 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (At this point, I would rather have the illegals here than the liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline
Shouldn’t his lawyers have realized that some of the “crimes” would be unprosecutable because of the statute of limitations?

It's a kangaroo court, did you see this liberal wacko judge. Give them a chance to show us how incompetent they are.

22 posted on 10/03/2023 6:58:55 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
Where is the US Supreme Court? All this legal action against Trump is nothing but election interference.

Has there ever been a more feckless, incompetent, confused group of "justices"?

If these people had been on the bench, the Democratic White Primary would still be going on, schools would still be segregated, and the Presidential Election votes in Florida would have been counted in private and without any supervision or accountability.

Are they worried about assuming ungranted authority? Interpretation of the Constitution is an assumption of authority!

I'm not a lawyer. Somebody explain all this to me. Please.

23 posted on 10/03/2023 6:59:41 AM PDT by Savage Beast (There is no limit to the heights to which we can rise. To be your best is the secret of happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
I'm not a lawyer. Somebody explain all this to me. Please.

Me neither, but they have to move thru this system, So the next step would be an appeal to the NYS appeals court, which is the highest court in NYS, not the NYS supreme court. Then the next step would be scotus.

24 posted on 10/03/2023 7:01:44 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

25 posted on 10/03/2023 7:14:02 AM PDT by Delta 21 (If anyone is treasonous, it is those who call me such.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All

It’s important to clarify what lawfare is: it’s not about getting a verdict; it’s providing headline fodder to destroy someone. The democrat agenda continues and we’re just victims until our “leadership” pushes back just as hard on the disingenuous evil it is.


26 posted on 10/03/2023 7:14:06 AM PDT by Paraclete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

His lawyers are lawyers and he’s doing this with their consent


27 posted on 10/03/2023 7:16:33 AM PDT by bigbob (Q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: bigbob
Yes,one would think that that's the case but you must admit that part of DJT’s charm is his wonderful unpredictability.
28 posted on 10/03/2023 7:21:46 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Two Words: Banana Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

When Trump is wrong, he admits he’s wrong
————————-
This should be in breaking news if this is true.


29 posted on 10/03/2023 7:27:49 AM PDT by cornfedcowboy ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler

Indeed this has all been a waste of time.

No wonder Attorney General Letitia James’s sat behind Trump and gave Trump the aunt Ester beady eyed stare.


30 posted on 10/03/2023 7:29:20 AM PDT by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Timber Rattler
Lol…would he be better off keeping his mouth shut for a change?

Of course, he wouldn’t be Trump if he did that.

”Engoron is an operative who should be disbarred. This is a judge that should be out of office.This is a judge that some people say could be charged criminally for what he's doing. He's interfering with an election, and it's a disgrace."

”Oh, wait. He’s a good guy.”


31 posted on 10/03/2023 7:31:07 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom (“Occupy your mind with good thoughts or your enemy will fill them with bad ones.” ~ Thomas More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline
... Shouldn’t his lawyers have realized that some of the “crimes” would be unprosecutable because of the statute of limitations?

And they made that motion right there in open court for all to see. Court has yet to rule on it.

32 posted on 10/03/2023 7:43:55 AM PDT by gloryblaze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

ping


33 posted on 10/03/2023 7:52:27 AM PDT by Taxman (SAVE AMERICA! VOTE REPUBLICAN IN 2023 AND 2024!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeplorablePaul

Letitia James needs to be DISBARRED & imprisoned for spending all this money on a case that was built of expired statutes.

There is a “USE BY DATE” on everything in the grocery store.

NOT AN UNHEARD OF CONCEPT.


34 posted on 10/03/2023 8:04:48 AM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro; cymbeline
It's a kangaroo court, did you see this liberal wacko judge. Give them a chance to show us how incompetent they are.

Yup, just like with the 2020 election when we learned that the law, whether state or federal, is now written on those magic slates with the plastic pen we had as kids. They just pick up the film the law is written on and rewrite it any way they like.

35 posted on 10/03/2023 8:08:56 AM PDT by Dahoser (I finally figured out what to call him: Fakephonyfraudident Biden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
Letitia James needs to be DISBARRED & imprisoned for spending all this money on a case that was built of expired statutes.

Only in a just world.

36 posted on 10/03/2023 8:11:32 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

The supreme court can’t just “step in” and “do” something, a matter must be appealed to them. There is nothing to currently appeal to them - this isn’t even in Federal court.


37 posted on 10/03/2023 8:14:27 AM PDT by CraigEsq (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CraigEsq

Why can’t Trump counter-sue in federal court for election interference?


38 posted on 10/03/2023 11:47:26 AM PDT by Savage Beast (There is no limit to the heights to which we can rise. To be your best is the secret of happiness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson