John Eastman faces disbarment proceedings in California over effort to reverse 2020 election

NBC News ^ | June 20, 2023 | Summer Concepcion

[americas.best.days...]

We’re entering new territory.

You think “all the best people” will line up to serve in a second Trump administration? Even his kids know better.

They’re not stopping until he’s dead or in jail.

[Trump_Triumphant]

No.

[If You Want It Fixed - Fix It]

He should put on a Schumer mask in court. They’ll toss it.

[Coronal]

It’s a professional proceeding, not a legal one.

[R0CK3T]

Democrats are communist authoritarians. But they do fight while Republicans Leadership wouldn’t fight if their entire family’s life was at stake.

[justme4now]

The Republican Party Emerges From Decades of Court Supervision

After being bound by a consent decree for 35 years, the Republican National Committee is now free to continue its “ballot security” campaign.

Thirty-five years after it was first imposed, a judge has lifted a consent decree barring the Republican National Committee from pursuing “ballot security” measures.

[John S Mosby]

He’s from Mississippi and has licenses in many other states. CA is nothing- a worthless State long abandoning Constitutional Scholarship- deliberately. Political pariah is Newsom et al.

[John S Mosby]

And where be dat Val now? Out of office cashing in her campaign money soaked from duped dem voters.. losing bigly to Marco Rubio.
.

This lying motorcyle cop (yeah chief of Orl. PD, big whoop- an idiot) said “my daddy worked as a slave on citrus plantations in Central FL”!!!- This would make her daddy way past age to have even developed sperm for insemination of anyone bearing....her! Truly thinks people are idiots and stupid. Good riddance and watch what you say.

What is she doing NOW— advising the queers at Disney World? or maybe “security”. The a@@clown the dems ran in her place beat a highly competent EX Marine Black Male Retired Colonel— and this a@@clown is a stoner worthless POS they put in to “hold” the seat. A disaster for people who need REPRESENTATION in Congress and get... him.

[Ge0ffrey]

The left is on the march.

[philman_36]

Try as they might the MSM just can't get there...

...he engaged in a plot to push a far-fetched legal strategy...

...he engaged in a plot to push an illegal strategy...

Quite the difference, isn't it.

[philman_36]

The left is on the march.

I agree!

[philman_36]

With the media what isn't said is oftentimes more important than what was said.

[Ann Archy]

Hey HUGH HEWITT!! THIS WAS YOUR FRIEND and YOU PUTZ have NOT STOOD UP FOR HIM!!

[Ann Archy]

Not sure today of Pope Francis.

[TribalPrincess2U]

EXACTLY!

[DoughtyOne]

If he’s going by the book with evidence, this should be
actionable.

[simpson96]

“he engaged in a plot to push a far-fetched legal strategy for Pence to overturn Biden’s electoral victory during the certification of Electoral College votes”

The tipoff is that word, “plot”.

How dare he legally explore an avenue that the deep state disagreed with.

[jimfree]

It is the lawyer’s duty to diligently pursue the interests of his client.

[philman_36]

It is the lawyer’s duty to diligently pursue the interests of his client.

Okay. And?

[philman_36]

...he engaged in a plot to push a far-fetched legal strategy...

THAT is how the narrative is being played.
Word games. He hasn't done anything ILLEGAL but we, the media, will damn sure try and convince you that he did by using weasel words like "far-fetched" because you won't go and look and see whether it was or not. We'll tell you what to think.
Go look! https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/21066248-eastman-memo

If it was so "far-fetched" why did Congress pass a law to keep the strategy from happening in the future?

Congress passes election reform designed to ward off another Jan. 6

The omnibus spending bill includes a section that would reform the Electoral Count Act, a 1887 law that governs the counting of Electoral College votes in Congress.
For years, legal scholars have worried the law was poorly written and in need of clarification, and former President Donald Trump and his allies targeted the law's ambiguities in their attempts to overturn the 2020 election. Just a little slanted on the words...again.

Sounds like somebody said...oh NO, he found a loophole...and they
rammed everything through and changed the law AFTER everything was over.

Am I the only one seeing this?