Posted on 05/06/2023 7:56:23 AM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
He mixed up a photo? Oh my, they’ve got him now!
Oh, I didn’t check to see if the actual pic was in there. Dang.
My rule of thumb: “If it is good for the cabal I don’t believe it. If it is bad for freedom and liberty, I don’t believe it. If I’m not allowed to say it, it’s true.”
Proves itself out again!
If someone showed me a pic of me and my wife in a crowd of strangers and asked me who the woman was, I would assume they were asking about the person I was most likely to know.
If they said, “No, who is this one” I’d say “How TF should I know? What are you, retarded?” XD
It was likely a Freudian slip. He was thinking about how attractive his wife at the time was and thinking, “why would I touch this woman”.
Good point. I thought it was a cringeworthy moment.
This probably will get thrown out because of a lack of evidence. Then again, it is in Manhattan. If this gets tossed, I’m sure there’s going to another right behind it.
Just eighteen months to go before the next elections. It’ll be tight, but FJB, et al, will probably pull off another coup . . .
In a sane world it would be a blowout for just about anyone running against Joe Biden.
And of course a reporter would never use words to suit their agenda
Because hes NEVER met the crazy hag..he doesn’t have the slightest idea who she is that is why he confused her with Marla Maples
Well who cares? Only you. The guy was depositioned for like 7 hours so he mistook Marla for Ivana in an old photo. It happens.
Dershowitz said yesterday that President Trump would probably lose this case. Mostly because of venue. Said that he’d appeal because many mistakes have been made by judge. But the point is to get Trump and ke.ep him tied up in litigation.
She wasn’t a 13 year old kid - she was a grown woman in a story that usually had MORE salespeople than customers... If she had called out ‘Can someone zip this dress up’ - five sales clerks would have come running. There’s no chance she’s telling the truth.
No. Of course. Not intentionally.
The jury. And that’s all that matters.
“Marla Maples who certainly was his type. So much so that he had an adulterous affair with her while he was married to his first wife, Ivana.”
Who has said that Trump had an adulterous affair with Marla Maples while he was married to Ivana?
IIRC, this is not true.
So then they changed the story and made it about how he said Carroll was not his type but in this pic, he identifies Carroll as Marla...Obviously, Marla was his type so the media and her attorneys concluded that Carroll must be his type.
Gag me...
From the deposition of Trump:
Carroll’s attorney:
: “Isn’t it true that you were seeing Ms. Maples before you were divorced from Ivana Trump?” Trump
“I don’t know,” in the sworn deposition. “It was towards the end of the marriage. So I don’t know, really. It could be a lapover, but I don’t really know.”
It must be awesome that you know more than Trump about his affair with Maples.
The object of the picture was to prove that he had met her...but you can tell from the picture that he has absolutely no interest in her..but in her husband john johnson...who was a big boy in Town.
Then they changed the entire story behind the picture. What a farce.
this case will be thrown out when its pointed out that Trump is the only one being prosecuted with this law.
Here's my problem...IIRC, Carroll filed her case within minutes of the law being passed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.