Posted on 12/14/2022 10:25:46 AM PST by Eleutheria5
I didn’t mean exonerated by the courts, I meant exonerated in the sphere of public opinion because his accuser was discredited.
AND Name Names!
Sarah Ransome?
Quite the nom de guerre
Still, she’ll probably end up killing herself
I think if those videos existed, we would have known about it by now.
“This is the only reason she at this point, is still alive.”
*************
Or she’s still alive because she’s lying and the deep state already knows this so doesn’t consider her a threat. Why wouldn’t she already released these videos to journalists or WikiLeaks or something, what’s the point of holding them back?
“I thought Dersh was exonerated, or is his guilt a still an open question?”
from the article:
Giuffre, now 39, initially claimed that she had been forced to have sex with Harvard law professor Dershowitz.
However, she sensationally backtracked last month, saying she “may have made a mistake” about his identity.
“I have long believed that I was trafficked by Jeffrey Epstein to Alan Dershowitz,” she said in a statement.
“However I was very young at the time, it was a very stressful and traumatic environment.
“I now recognize I may have made a mistake in identifying Mr. Dershowitz.”
Giuffre, who now lives in Australia agreed to drop a defamation lawsuit against Dershowitz that had claimed he had libeled her by saying she was lying.
At the same time Dershowitz, 84, withdrew a countersuit against Giuffre
So, Giuffre sued Dersh. He countersued her. They agreed to drop their suits against each other. IMHO, he paid her some amount of money to shut up and go away.
“what’s the point of holding them back?”
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
She wants to get paid.
She is trolling bait in the water. She is waiting for one of the fish to bite.
I don’t know how you measure that.
Yes it’s quite possible he paid her off, but there’s also the chance she was intimidated by the countersuit because she lacked enough proof that Dersh had sex with her. If she had to face him in court she would be asked about specific dates and other matters that she no longer remembered. So it’s hard to say for sure what the truth of this matter is.
I wonder why this woman hasn’t mentioned all the many other prominent people she was forced to sleep with? Have they paid her off and now she was coming for Dershowitz to do the same? Or was she really uncertain about him? They need to release the Epstein client list, but of course they never will if they can help it.
He met his wife yesterday for lunch, and since that day, ‘I have had sex with one woman since the day I met my wife.’
Problem is that possession and/or distribution of this evidence is almost certainly a crime because it is child pornography.
If law enforcement doesn’t do its job, nothing can be done apart from vigilante street justice. The elite criminals are well protected.
Well the accuser had backed off her claims against Dershowitz, now saying she was uncertain and could possibly have been mistaken. After saying that I think we can assume that was sufficient to affect most of public opinion away from Dershowitz’s guilt, why wouldn’t it be?
I recall Dersh saying that the only time he visited the island was when he brought his wife with him.
He also said that he had spent over $1MM defending himself against this claim/suit.
Maybe Dersh did not have with Guifre. He had sex with this OTHER young girl.
That would be extortion which is illegal. This woman just seems unstable, who knows what she wants, whether it be money or attention. Personally I doubt she has any tapes.
“Maybe Dersh did not have with Guifre. He had sex with this OTHER young girl.”
*******************
That could be true as well, in any case I’ll bet he at least knew what was going on there. Epstein, on behalf of Mossad/CIA were using this honey trap so they could blackmail politicians should it become necessary. It’s possible Dershowitz avoided any sex because he knew he would be compromised if he did.
Sometimes(like in my divorce case) you decide to just pay some amount to make the other person go away. Life is too short, etc.
It is only extortion IF she asks for money in exchange for the tapes. If some lawyer approaches her lawyer and says hypothetically what would it take to buy these tapes? Then it is just a business deal.
Dershowitz was Epstein’s attorney when the State of Florida charged him with having sex with a 14 year old girl at his Palm Beach house. Of course he knew what was going on there.
The deal he got Epstein was that he could leave prison during the day and report back at night to jail. For raping a 14 year old girl.
Dershowitz is one of the best lawyers in the country. He teaches law at Harvard. The most prominent law school in the USA/world. He was one of OJ’s lawyers.
“After saying that I think we can assume that was sufficient to affect most of public opinion away from Dershowitz’s guilt, why wouldn’t it be?”
You seem to think public opinion is shaped by rational thinking, but I am not so sure about that. Seems herd mentality based on emotional manipulation dominates more often than not.
Dershowitz is certainly no saint and I’m sure he was aware of nefarious doings being involved with Epstein. About the only thing he’s good for is he occasionally calls out the left when they try and pull some unconstitutional nonsense. (Constitutional Law being his specialty I believe) Other than that he’s just another sleazy lawyer who obviously loves the limelight.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.