Posted on 11/18/2022 6:48:58 PM PST by AbolishCSEU
Lind has a “sword sticking through him,” kills one of the guys that attacked him, and teh DA is thinking of charging Lind?? Sounds like utter insanity. Or California.
Renters can be absolute monsters. I think the ratio of monster renters to monster landlord is about 50 to one.
20-foot trailers and shipping containers
Sounds pretty upscale ... but then again it is California.
Probably time to outlaw renting housing. Day x Day only.
Poor old guy. Still working as property manager at 80, and this is what he gets. Certain evictions should be done with a sherrif or armed security guard at your side.
I’ve been hearing about more and more sword attacks from the homeless population. Is there some misguided nonprofit organization supplying the crazed homeless with Free Samuri Swords?
First aid question: Guy comes to your door with a sword through him. Do you remove the sword or leave in in for the medics that should be on the way?
Media “Samurai swords” are about as accurate as their “AR-15’s are assault weapons” claims.
Real Samurai swords value would buy a nice house.
What these vermin are slashing about with are very cheap Chinese/Pakistani knock-off’s.
Look for Crapifornia to ban them soon.
After all, we must punish the 99.9% innocent for the actions of the .1% criminals!
Leave it in.
There can be only one!
DO NOT remove the sword or any other impaled object!
If it is in an artery or heavily blood supplied organ, it would be like popping the cork on a warm champagne bottle!
I actually know Curtis and am sorry this happened to him.
It’s a small world.
Never remove an impaled object.
He used to have a tugboat in the marina, that’s how we met. Awful story.
Never?
I’m not sure that is what happened.
The article is written in 202os’ “word salad” style where you can’t tell who did what to who or what the result was, or even how many people were involved. But it says that the two arrested were arrested for the death of a “fellow squatter”, which implies that neither of the two was the property owner.
Nowhere in the posted part of the article do they affirmatively state that the impaling did not kill the property owner, which should have been established in the same sentence that first mentions the impaling.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.