Posted on 11/08/2022 12:43:14 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
I’m going to guess that they are so seldomly used that they o’t have an hour meter.
So Rooters is creating fake news editorials now?
not even trying to pretend to be a news aggregate outfit?
According to DemocRATS, malfunctioning voting machines is evidence of a free and fair election.
Rooter has a big D on their cheerleader outfits. Always have.
Some poster here told me the Arizona GOP is a different GOP. Right. They’re still not getting one red cent until cheating is under control.
I think Reuters has always been a creature of Euro socialism.
France has 62.5 million people, almost ten times the population of Arizona. There was 72% participation in their most recent election, higher than any U.S. state. Ballots are counted by hand. The election results were complete the next day. Something is very wrong in Arizona and indeed America with regard to the election process.
LOL.....”The Resistance” was righteous. “The insurrection” was heinous.
Go check out the definition of both of these words. They essentially mean the same exact thing, with one important caveat...... A resistance is an uprising against an illegitimate government. An insurrection is an uprising against a legitimate government.
Satan is good at playing word games!
You mean like this?
it’s only red areas but Reuter’s see nothing suspicious.
So, if these machines are not connected to the internet, as claimed, how are so many of them exhibiting identical “failures” at exactly the same time? That’s quite the coincidence there. No, this is the behavior you would expect from machines that are on a network with a server somewhere that is either causing an error to propagate across the network, or that is triggering some type of fraud mode on a certain percentage of the machines.
Paper ballots are the easiest way to steal elections. You have to print lots of unvoted ballots for everyone who might show up plus spoiled ballots. Having lots of unfilled ballots lying somewhere makes it tempting to have someone fill them out and put them into ballot boxes.
We breathed a sigh of relief when redistricting in 2012 got rid of the southern portion of our congressional district where the counties still used paper ballots. I was a recount worker in 2010 when we had a recount in our congressional race where the 28 year incumbent had been defeated by 799 votes on election night. The congressman only wanted to recount the counties where paper ballots were used. In my county he only wanted to recount absentee ballots and emergency ballots cast in their stronghold precinct when they had a "power outage". Under Texas law however, You can't just pick precincts in a county for a recount. It's required to recount all the of the precincts in a county involved in a particular race. Since all of the county is in one congressional district, the whole county had to be recounted.
The county clerk and employees of her office loaded all the memory modules in precinct order for election day and loaded the early in person votes. The results were identical to election night even though on election night, the modules are loaded as they come in not in precinct number order. The next day we sorted the paper absentee ballots from the order they were received to precinct order. After we got all the ballots sorted by precinct, we then counted the ballots precinct by precinct in tables of 3 recount workers. A few tables then counted the emergency ballots. We got all our work done in 1.5 days. Our results were identical precinct by precinct to election night. The southern part of our congressional district were quite different. They had to recount all the votes cast in the election. They took several days to do this and the incumbent gained around 250 votes but not enough to reverse the outcome on election night. It's funny how all the errors in counting in those counties favored the DemocRAT candidate.
Two years earlier, in 2008, Republicans took over control of the county commission by flipping one of the Democrat held commissioner's seat by just 129 votes. The Democrats didn't even bother to ask for a recount, because the overwhelming majority of votes were cast on electronic voting machines. Just a small percentage of the vote was cast on absentee ballots. This was the first time since Reconstruction that Republicans got control of the county commission.
Electronic voting machines are much more accurate than paper ballots and are quicker to count. We typically have all our votes counted including absentee ballots by 10:30 pm on election night. "Progressive states" like California that let voters bring in paper ballots from home to ballot collection boxes as late as poll closing time on election day, take weeks to count their ballots.
Oh we should feel so much better, Cavuto just clarified the Maricopa situation…
There is a vote tabulation machine problem affecting 233 voting centers in Maricopa, it does not affect the votes themselves, JUST THE TABULATION of those votes. But Neil assured his viewers that they are keeping an eye on it for us. Hahahahahaha.
hmmm, people protesting the fact that they cannot vote... let’s barricade the doors, that’ll show them
Stop believing your lying eyes! You’re inciting violence and undermining demoncrazy.
Reuters, just like the AP are nothing more than propaganda machines for the NWO / WEF ultra wealthy pukes. Fake to the bone!
I can’t wait until they try to figure out how to say “Katie Hobbs denies the legitimacy of election seemingly won by election denier Kari Lake”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.