'Passengers who don’t want to be groped, please use the rear train cars' announcement angers many

Sora News 24 ^ | Sep. 11 , 2022 | Casey Baseel,

[dennisw]

I will bet that in the last 40 years that have been a few Japanese movies made about the women who dig the groping on trains. Or they fall in love with their constant groper.

[TwelveOfTwenty]

People have gone over this again and again and again. There will always be an irresponsible minority of men out there. You cannot blame 80% of men for the 20% that run around spreading their seed without care. But you can encourage the majority of women to stop hopping in bed with them.

I'm not sure those numbers are correct, but there's more than this to it anyway. Men shell out billions of dollars a year on prostitution in this country alone. That doesn't even count the quality time spent in strip bars and other such ventures.

All of this is money and time that could have been spent fighting the negative aspects of feminism, such as transforming our school system so that girls can assault boys any time they want for any or no reason, and boys can't even defend themselves without being told never to hit a girl. Do you wonder why schools don't tell girls never to hit boys? Because fathers won't defend their sons and demand it. They just go along with it. Whose choice is that?

1% of what men spend on prostitution would be millions that could fund class action lawsuits against the school system, but men decided the services of prostitutes are more important. Whose fault is it that the society they helped mold turns on them?

[fr_freak]

Men shell out billions of dollars a year on prostitution in this country alone.

For Pete's sake, what do you think the percentage is of men who pay for prostitutes? Because I bet you don't have the slightest idea. I sure don't, because I don't know anyone who frequents them. We're back to the "blame the majority for the behavior of the minority" mentality again.

[TwelveOfTwenty]

For Pete's sake, what do you think the percentage is of men who pay for prostitutes? Because I bet you don't have the slightest idea.

It's difficult to get good numbers, but I've seen estimates as high as 69%, according to Kinsey in 1948.

But the issue we're discussing is that men won't fight back against toxic feminism. The billions men spend on prostitution every year is a part of the problem, regardless of how many are involved.

I sure don't, because I don't know anyone who frequents them.

Do you think they would be telling you about it?

[fr_freak]

It's difficult to get good numbers, but I've seen estimates as high as 69%, according to Kinsey in 1948.

Kinsey is a long since discredited quack who used prostitutes and hardened prisoners to get his results. And you have an incredibly cynical view of men if you think 69% are visiting prostitutes. If that is something you are capable of believing, then YOU have the problem.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

That's inferring

No, it's "implying".

[T.B. Yoits]

Re: Inferring vs Implying (Post 11)

I'm still confused which to use here. The person making the announcement on the speaker would never imply that passengers who wanted to be groped use the front cars but riders could infer that's what the announcer meant.

[ROCKLOBSTER]

The person making the announcement on the speaker would never imply that passengers who wanted to be groped use the front cars

I'm sure he didn't mean to suggest that.

You initially stated: From the article: "Passengers who do not.....make use of the rear carriages." That's inferring......

The "article" can't infer anything, but it can imply.

riders could infer that's what the announcer meant.

We have no way of knowing what they thought, but you had referenced the comment from "the article".

An "implication" is a suggestion, or hint.

An "inference" is a comprehension or understanding.

[TwelveOfTwenty]

I said I've seen estimates as high as 69%. While I wouldn't doubt that, I don't know that it's accurate. One thing is for sure. Someone is spending those billions a year on prostitutes in this country, and they sure aren't women.

It came as no surprise that you completely avoided the point I was making anyway. Whether men patronize prostitutes (most of whom are trafficked or with abusive pimps, by the way) at a rate of 69% or 10%, the issue we're discussing is that men won't fight back against toxic feminism.

But since we're on that subject, read up on prostitution, abusive pimps, and human traffickers, and tell me you aren't disgusted at the thought that men would think all of that is worth it just to have a warm wet spot to stick it in to. Don't you want men to be better than this?

[fr_freak]

Yeah, you’re kind of all over the place. No thanks.

[bert]

Maimed Chikan’s don’t grope