Posted on 09/11/2022 12:29:01 PM PDT by george76
I will bet that in the last 40 years that have been a few Japanese movies made about the women who dig the groping on trains. Or they fall in love with their constant groper.
I'm not sure those numbers are correct, but there's more than this to it anyway. Men shell out billions of dollars a year on prostitution in this country alone. That doesn't even count the quality time spent in strip bars and other such ventures.
All of this is money and time that could have been spent fighting the negative aspects of feminism, such as transforming our school system so that girls can assault boys any time they want for any or no reason, and boys can't even defend themselves without being told never to hit a girl. Do you wonder why schools don't tell girls never to hit boys? Because fathers won't defend their sons and demand it. They just go along with it. Whose choice is that?
1% of what men spend on prostitution would be millions that could fund class action lawsuits against the school system, but men decided the services of prostitutes are more important. Whose fault is it that the society they helped mold turns on them?
It's difficult to get good numbers, but I've seen estimates as high as 69%, according to Kinsey in 1948.
But the issue we're discussing is that men won't fight back against toxic feminism. The billions men spend on prostitution every year is a part of the problem, regardless of how many are involved.
I sure don't, because I don't know anyone who frequents them.
Do you think they would be telling you about it?
No, it's "implying".
I'm still confused which to use here. The person making the announcement on the speaker would never imply that passengers who wanted to be groped use the front cars but riders could infer that's what the announcer meant.
I'm sure he didn't mean to suggest that.
You initially stated: From the article: "Passengers who do not.....make use of the rear carriages." That's inferring......
The "article" can't infer anything, but it can imply.
riders could infer that's what the announcer meant.
We have no way of knowing what they thought, but you had referenced the comment from "the article".
An "implication" is a suggestion, or hint.
An "inference" is a comprehension or understanding.
It came as no surprise that you completely avoided the point I was making anyway. Whether men patronize prostitutes (most of whom are trafficked or with abusive pimps, by the way) at a rate of 69% or 10%, the issue we're discussing is that men won't fight back against toxic feminism.
But since we're on that subject, read up on prostitution, abusive pimps, and human traffickers, and tell me you aren't disgusted at the thought that men would think all of that is worth it just to have a warm wet spot to stick it in to. Don't you want men to be better than this?
Yeah, you’re kind of all over the place. No thanks.
Maimed Chikan’s don’t grope
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.