Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump-linked lawyer John Eastman slams DOJ in Tucker Carlson appearance
washington examiner ^ | 6/27/2022 | ryan king

Posted on 06/27/2022 9:46:10 PM PDT by bitt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Warrants are a rubber stamp. Courts and prosecutors are on the same team. The government is naturally adversarial to the public, it’s a universal truth.


21 posted on 06/28/2022 3:44:55 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MayflowerMadam

I hope he DOES take it all the way up.

It would be a total game changer

These eye rollin’ effbeei’s did it to Dr Corsi, and Roger Stone ...in fact there was a bomb placed directly opposite to his his florida office...you shoulda’ seen the freakin’ damage and it was NOT a from a gas leak, Roger even said that.

Corsi stated he wasnt going “ to confess” as these goons kept pressing him ...into making a false statement .....they rried him every which way from Sunday but Corsi stood his ground


22 posted on 06/28/2022 3:46:53 AM PDT by thesligoduffyflynns ( When you are going through hell keep going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
-- Using the power of government to target political opponents is the textbook definition of fascism. --

Tyranny.

Fascism is the economic relationship or the government with the means of production and labor, where the means of production are privately owned but government managed. We have a quasi-fascist government in the US. The private industries are tightly regulated so rent-seek and cooperate with the government.

Socialism and Communism is just slightly different, where the means of production are government owned, nationalization of all industry.

Most modern governments are a complex mix, not all one way or another, and there is always a private black market outside of government control.

23 posted on 06/28/2022 3:52:05 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thinden

The seizure may come short of passing constitutional muster, but it was not illegal. It was perfectly according to law. There was a warrant. Producing the warrant half a minute after the seizure is “perfect.” Nothing says the target has a right to see it at any particular time, only that it (the warrant) exist before the seizure.


24 posted on 06/28/2022 3:54:43 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bitt

There is no Constitution now.


25 posted on 06/28/2022 5:47:11 AM PDT by bray (The Vax is fake and deadly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

The FBI seems singularly focused on political persecution, and derelict of duty on all manner of unlawfulness from our open borders, fentanyl, drug, human and child-sex trafficking, Hunter Biden’s political compromise, stolen elections, FISA abuses and on and on.

Time to scrap this agency altogether and begin the process of barring all current members from any future federal positions of trust, scour their internal documents for evidence on crimes of treason and/or elite capture and prosecute ALL current and former leadership for ANY crimes discovered, current and past.


26 posted on 06/28/2022 6:57:55 AM PDT by Bshaw (A nefarious deceit is upon us all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thanx for your opinion


27 posted on 06/28/2022 8:20:32 AM PDT by thinden (buckle up.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: thinden

LOL. I’m not defending the warrant. I think the action is despicable. My point is that the law is pretty much carelss about its own abuse. It’s a tool, like a shovel or a gun.

The people who now have the tool of law in their hands are evil.


28 posted on 06/28/2022 8:50:53 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bitt

The FBI needs to be defunded and punished. Wray needs to be thrown in jail.


29 posted on 06/28/2022 8:51:56 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
It was perfectly according to law.

I believe you know what you are talking about. I would like to believe that the 4th amendment would protect the public, and I think it does to a certain extent, but even if the seizure gets ruled unconstitutional later, the damage is already done. Neither the FBI nor the judge who authorized the warrant is going to keep the information from political operatives (the J6 gang).

30 posted on 06/28/2022 8:56:53 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

4th amwndment remedy is evidence supressed from criminal trial.

There are some civil and criminal penalties in statutory law, for unauthorized snooping via wire, internet, etc; but those remedies are illusory. Never been an award or charge, never will be. One big case with solid evidence was tossed when the government asserted state secret.


31 posted on 06/28/2022 9:51:37 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
There are some civil and criminal penalties in statutory law, for unauthorized snooping via wire, internet, etc; but those remedies are illusory

The 4th Amendment could work IF those in charge believed in its principles but they don't really. Sometimes they pretend they do and decide to resist evil acts, perhaps not because they want to, but from caution. The present reality in depressing. The future may be worse.

32 posted on 06/28/2022 10:35:18 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Gotcha.

I’ve always been interested in your perspective on legal issues


33 posted on 06/28/2022 10:58:47 AM PDT by thinden (buckle up.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

There is a handful of people in Congress who are the privacy champions. Ron Wyden, Mike Lee come readily to mind. Rand Paul too. Theses are the big actors whose job is to calm the people.

I don’t know if they are sincere or not, but it doesn’t matter. There is not a law on the books that can control government or a criminal. The government will snoop to the extent technology admits, and will play word games about how what it is doing isn;t snooping, isn’t illegal, is constitutional, whatever.

The law has no practical play here. If you want privacy, think about how to be private, and act as though the law is not going to afford any protection.

It’s fairly amazing how much of the constitution is on the trash heap, while the courts and government swear up and down they are protecting it.


34 posted on 06/28/2022 11:45:40 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

Thanks. Your post agrees with what I have learned. We need more people in government with a conscience, but making that happen is not easy at all. I think Trump had some good intentions, but look at what happened to the people he appointed.


35 posted on 06/28/2022 12:41:39 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson