Posted on 06/25/2022 5:22:37 PM PDT by mcenedo
If they (liberal women) practiced abstinence unless they wanted to have a child, this ruling would have no effect.
Did Willie "deserve" to have sex with Kamala?
good, go with that. it’s best for you and all concerned.
After watching the people wearing green outside the US Supreme Court yesterday, I wonder why most of those people care about Rowe v. Wade as most of them look as if they could not possibly get pregnant. Perhaps I am missing something about the 18 to 44 female population and the same age male population but I was repulsed by most of the wymyn.
So.... liberals have decided to stop reproducing?
I’m still not tired if winning!
Good I love being conservative. If I wasn’t I’d be downing a bucket of pills right now.
The majority of the broads crying and whining about not being able to get an abortion have sex with other women anyway so I don’t think they’re going to have a problem.
Vasectomies are a surgery for men who want to permanently end their fertility. The reversal surgeries aren't reliable enough.
That’s like closing the barn door after the horse has already escaped 🤪
I predict that law firms specializing in child support cases are about to see tremendous growth in their business.
Fewer untoward conceptions, fewer abortions, fewer baby daddies, less fornication.
We need to make Clarence Thomas a verb, like Bork.
Women who would use sex as a tool or an implement are to be avoided at all costs.
They opened valve and let all the crazy out.
Thank God. Perhaps that is the lesson. Most blacks don’t understand that this country would have a black majority if it weren’t for Roe v. Wade. They should be singing Hallelujah at is demise.
I feel sorry for progressive guys. They are the ones who will get no sack time with their whiny wenches. Conservative guys never wanted the headache of dealing with them over pillow talk in the first place. Not worth the grief
Hahaha great post!!!
It will fail horribly. They have no idea why and most of you don’t know why either.
Men like roughly 50% of women shown to them, looks-wise. 50% of women are not sex candidates.
Women like 15-20% of men shown to them. This means by default 85% of men are invisible to women and the vast majority of these men don’t have sex with women, right now.
In other words, women right now, are not having sex with 85% of men, even without declaring a “sex strike”. So not really a change at all, for 85% of men.
Further there is a segment of women who want sex but will not get it no matter what, because men don’t want to have sex with them.
There is also a segment of women who have a guy they have sex with because she demands it, who will be extremely grateful for them to call a “sex strike”.
Its going to be a colossal fail. Bring it.
They don’t see how they lose and we win.
If they go on a sex strike, what does it matter if they can’t get an abortion? Who will need abortions if there’s no sex going on?
WORKS FOR ME. :)
They are just so incredibly stupid and evil.
Yes. Learning continence is a good thing.
Well, all righty then, challenge accepted. The ultimate radical feminist weapon is abstinence, is it? Irony is ironic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.