2,000 MULES: What must be said about media blackout

mikehuckabee.com ^ | May 13, 2022 | Mike Huckabee

[rlmorel]

Sometime in the last few years, I heard someone say this, and I realized it boiled things down to me in a Manichean fashion, to a yes or no:

There are two sacred covenants between the governed and the governing powers in a constitutional republic such as ours, and for us as the governed to consent to being governed, both of these MUST be inviolably observed to preserve the union of the governed and the governors:

1. Elections to choose who governs us must be free and fair.
   
   
2. Those who govern us must abide by the same laws that we agree to be governed by.

If either of these are abrogated, then we can no longer have a constitutional republic. Both of these have been violated on a regular basis. If we do not remedy this, our country will be no more.

Our survival as a nation is at stake. We may not survive for a number of other reasons, but if we cannot select who leads us and expect they will live under the same laws as we do and and be punished if they don't, then we will not survive no matter what.

[rlmorel]

That was one of the things I found to be quite powerful about it. It may well be censored and ignored in a variety of spaces, but I would like to see how someone thinks they can debunk it.

They are trying to debunk both the geotracking and the algorithms, but the geotracking they use now is endorsed in its effectiveness by the US Military, Law Enforcement, and even the Supreme Court. Pretty hard to debunk that. They can't attack the source of the data. True The Election will shrug their shoulders, hand them the contact information for the data warehouse THEY got their info from and say "Here. You can call them and buy the exact same data we got and used. Have at it."

And they can attack the algorithm, but...any normal person...anyone who has ever been a parent with kids up to no good...any LEO personnel who know the seamy underbelly of society better than most anyone, and...anyone with common sense will see this graphic generated showing the path of a typical ballot "mule" visiting ballot dropboxes at 2 AM, and realize it isn't some guy going out to a convenience store at 2 AM to buy a pack of cigarettes for himself or pickles for his pregnant wife, and it isn't some person driving too or from work.

And lastly, they can't attack the dropbox surveillance video synched to the geotracking. Any normal person...anyone who has ever been a parent with kids up to no good...any LEO personnel who know the seamy underbelly of society better than most anyone, and...anyone with common sense will look at these people getting out of their cars in little dead end alleys, looking all around them to see if anyone is watching, and surreptitiously stuffing a number of ballots into the box before scurrying away, looking around them guiltily...anyone who sees that behavior knows precisely that those people are up to no good.

And that isn't even mentioning the brazen people who walked up in full daylight with people all around and began stuffing ballots into a box. Even a box outside a voting precinct, with people watching them do it openly in stunned amazement. One has to wonder what is going through their minds. What kinds of chumps must they be stand patiently in line to cast their careful vote while someone drives up in a car and neutralizes 10 or 20 of their own votes right in front of their eyes.

Dalberg-Acton, you are so spot on. They can and may well succeed in censoring, muzzling, or ignoring this movie, but...anyone who cares for this country, ANYONE except for Leftists who sees it cannot fail to be moved by it and see they are being fed a pack of lies. And that can be terribly disillusioning for people.

But you are right. Their only defense is to not let people see it, not let people hear about it, and not let people talk about it. And I don't underestimate their power anymore.

[rlmorel]

Good luck. Well worth the effort.

[Dalberg-Acton]

Great post. Thank you!

[Vaduz]

Media only uses one word deny deny deny......................

[hecticskeptic]

I watched it last night and found the geotracking component of this to be very compelling evidence. The folks at True the Vote and D’Souza all need to be congratulated and supported.

I do have one comment on a change/addition that I wish they would have made which I think would have made this more powerful.... As I understand the methodology they used, they used specific criteria to hone in on the Mules; I don’t remember it exactly but to meet the criteria, the targets related to a) mules visiting multiple drop points, b) mules making multiple trips to the drop points and c) multiple visits to the centers where ballots were picked up..... and the bar of ‘multiple’ could be set anywhere but the idea of why it would be necessary for anyone to visit a drop point more than once should raise eyebrows immediately.

What always makes something more powerful is when there is a head to head comparison to something else... or for this case, other locations. During the documentary, cities like Milwaukee and Atlanta were focused on....There is always going to be leftists who come up with some stupid reason why the criteria for the Mules could be met in some ‘innocent way’. What I think would have made the documentary more powerful is if it had of shown how it would have looked if an identical criteria had of been applied to some city that was in a deep red area.... or perhaps even a ‘blue city’ that is in a ‘red state’. Take for example, cities in Texas like Dallas, Houston, Austin and San Antonio.... all which show up as ‘blue cities’ on the 2020 election map ( https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/upshot/2020-election-map.html ) If that same criteria of Mules had of been applied for those cities, would any have been identified?

[rlmorel]

There is a point of difference...I heard another poster say that someone had to pass five non-profits and visit at least ten ballot drop boxes, and I assumed I had heard it incorrectly.

When I watched it again...I thought I heard the one of the two people who were involved with True The Vote say that the criteria was "visited at least one non-profit" which makes more sense to me.

I will try to verify that.

That said, I fail to find any rational explanation for the path followed by a mule in the animated GIF I posted at #62 other than...the person was visiting every dropbox in the region.

Because that is what their path shows.

At 2:30 AM.

And coupled with the video they were able to glean out of that 4 million minutes that was time synchronized with the path driven...well. It does, as Sebastian Gorka said indignantly, beggar belief.

Let's say there were robberies of five houses in a neighborhood. Think of a a parent whose known problematic son was accused of such a thing, were they presented by the authorities with this cell phone tracking path, showing the track, and it showed their son taking a circuitous route that took him out of the way but passed all five burglarized houses in the time frame the robberies took place.

Then they played footage from a security camera on a house that showed their son's car stop nearby and their mask-wearing son wearing rubber gloves comes into view and disappears, then reappears some minutes later.

At that point, a well meaning uncle who happened to be visiting says "There is probably an innocent explanation for this..."

At that point, the mother, father, and detective all pause to look at the uncle in disbelief and irritation.

(LOL, in telling this, it is not YOU who are the uncle, hecticskeptic, it is the Leftists who offer that explanation who should be met with stares of irritated disbelief!)

Just t be clear-they were only focused on the battleground states that Biden won in the wee hours of the morning. They had two million dollars to spend from a grant, and could only afford to buy the "geofenced" tracking data in those states, so they were working within the confines of that, not to mention the "Citizen's Requests" (Like the FOIA requests for federal data but at the state level) they had to put I and hammer through.

Using that data, they WERE able to see that pattern shown in the animated GIF at post #62 in other battleground states, that same criteria identified more than a thousand such "mules" in Pennsylvania, and so on.

Heh, you can tell I was pretty convinced by it, but...I admit that I already concluded there was massive election fraud. (Which is a point made by the infamous Politi"Fact" "Fact Check" done on...wait for it...the PREVIEW of the documentary!!!! In it (again, on the PREVIEW of the documentary) they said:

"...It is conspiracist thinking," he said. "They are interpreting data that confirms their pre-existing conclusions. It’s a zombie claim; no matter how many times you kill it, it keeps coming back..."

So, yes! You are spot on, and they used that even before the documentary was seen.

Well. I guess that will be the Leftist mantra, as it always seems to be. " Deny, Deny, Deny".

And there is no denying that they are banking on a sufficient number of people to simply say "Oh. I heard the documentary was debunked."

What we are banking on is that there are a sufficient number of Americans who, after seeing this compelling documentary, will look with irritated disbelief at the Leftists who say "Oh, there are innocent explanations for this activity..."

[Antoninus]

What must be said? They were in on it. Even Faux News. Duh. The last thing they want is evidence of the fraud to be made public.

[hecticskeptic]

(LOL, in telling this, it is not YOU who are the uncle, hecticskeptic, it is the Leftists who ....
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Of course not... there is a reason why ‘skeptic’ is part of my screen name. From the moment that WuFlu became a thing.... and the drop of boxes as the solution to voting during a so-called ‘pandemic’, it was quite apparent what they were doing. The only thing to wonder about is that since they are now exposed, what stunt are they going to replace it with... or are they going to try to bull their way through this and try something almost similar? I wouldn’t put it past them. This is why they must absolutely be crushed.

[rlmorel]

I simply could not be more in agreement.

They are going to try to bull their way through it. Not a single doubt in my mind.

Leftism in American politics should be as disreputable as Communism became in the late Forties and early Fifties.

I am not saying there shouldn’t be dissenting views. I am saying those dissenting views should come from Americans, people who buy into how this country was founded and the principles of the Constitution.

I simply don’t believe those people on the Left today meet those criteria needed to be called American.

[Lurkinanloomin]

I finally got an email from Salem that they shipped on the 13th.
Obviously not in the order they received orders.

[Charles H. (The_r0nin)]

For example, the geospatial data could show a mule stopping by a maibox at exactly the same time a ballot dropbox camera showed a mule stuffing ballots in. That did not happen once in the film.

Exactly that was shown in the film, several times. That is how they identified the times on the video to look for the mules... they state that clearly. Why are you pushing disinformation about a video you clearly didn't watch?

[rlmorel]

Sorry this is so long, but I was thinking about this a bit.

I just finished listening to Dan Bongino interview both Dinesh D'Souza and Catherine Engelbrecht, and Ms. Engelbrecht did say they had to visit at least five "Get-Out-The-Vote Non-Profits) (which I will refer to as NGO), so there is that. I will try to find out if there is an explanation why someone needed to go to at least 5 NGO organizations.

NOTE: You may also want to watch LINK: LOCAL INSURGENCIES: THE EPOCH TIMES FEATURES INTERVIEW WITH TRUE THE VOTE ABOUT WHO IS FUNDING THE BALLOT MULES

If I had to guess, it is that these NGO organizations are universally far Leftist, Community Organizer types. (There may be one here or there that is actually non-partisan or even conservative, but I am willing to bet they make up less than 5%, probably far less.)

So they are all partisan, all rowing in the same direction with the same goal. I have zero doubt that this fraud was organized and financed at a national level via the flood of money (such as ZuckBucks) flowing into the NGO organizations, but was executed at local levels.

I am guessing that these organizations all have the same goals, may even know each other, and are pooling the two valuable scarce resources which are used :

1. SCARCE RESOURCE 1: Mail-in ballots that may be easily used or manufactured ballots which they need to be far more careful with.

2. SCARCE RESOURCE 2: Mules to distribute the ill-gotten or illegally produced mail in ballots to ballot drop boxes to be deposited in small batches of 10-20 votes. (for obvious reasons, they don't want to stuff ballot boxes with thousands or even hundreds of votes at the same time. They have to be introduced in small amounts.)

What is the illegal process to produce a ballot that may be introduced into the voting process? I just don't know. I can only speculate.

Printing fake names on ballots would be risky, I would think. You need real names. You get these from the voter rolls which may be acquired legally.

And you want to get the names of people on the ballots who have not voted. This one makes sense as well, and that data is also readily available legally.

So, I assume one or both of these two things is true to explain why someone doesn't just load up their car with ballots, and may have to make more trips:

1. Ballots that are suitable for illegally introducing into the election process are in short supply and are produced somewhat on a demand basis.

2. They don't want someone loading up their car with thousands of fraudulent ballots.

If fraudulent ballots are hard to get, it is not inconceivable to me that they would pool resources, where the NGO organization would have their own teams, in their own locations either picking up unused ballots from areas, helping vulnerable people fill out their ballots, and discarding non-Biden votes, or even printing ballots on high-res copiers

They probably limit it on each mule's trip to what can be fit into a backpack, hidden and out of site. The last thing they want is a mule getting stopped by a cop (who might be a conservative) and asking "What do you have in those boxes?" What is that person going to say? Ballots? And what if the cop asks to take a look?

I have an overpowering conviction that there is some active process when the polls are open which can show who has and has not voted. You should not be able to find out who voted for a candidate, but I will bet money that in the world of digital voting (and ALL of these battleground states had digital voting) that if you have access to the systems, you can find out who has not voted. And as an IT professional who read the Antrim County forensic analysis in detail, I can assure you that anyone could get into that system. Anyone.

My guess is that they take the voter rolls and find out who is registered to vote, and if they have voted in the last four elections. If they have not participated, those votes are prioritized, fixed on official or fake ballots, and prepared for distribution according to an algorithm. If a person is 80 years old (assuming that is a valid data element available) and has not voted by 8 PM, these are likely checked against who has already voted, and any who have not yet voted will be extracted and given to a mule to stuff into boxes.

That is the Low Hanging Fruit.

All the while, they are using the electronic voting system tallies to keep count to have an idea of how many fixed ballots are needed to give their candidate a victory. They do this on an ongoing basis, and work proceeds behind the scenes by these NGO personnel to manufacture the ballots: "Here is a list. Get ballots filled out for all the voters on this list and have them ready for the next mule to come by. She should be by in about an hour."

This list is going to be higher risk. You know at this hour, it is less likely an 80 year old is going to vote, so that is pretty safe, but you have to do a risk assessment with each batch as the easy ones disappear. Perhaps you say "get me all the people aged 70-80 who haven't voted yet. Or whatever.

This all presupposes that the different NGOs may cover different areas to minimize overlap, that the DOB of a voter is available in the voter rolls, etc.

I saw evidence in the film that the overlap issue may be a real one, and that in at least one instance, they had 1,962 ballots show up in a drop box that normally drop boxes in that region may have had 40-50 ballots in them. I had no problem visualizing a screw up in communication, where only certain mules should have gone to a particular drop box, but...every mule in the area was going to that one drop box thinking it was theirs, and as a result, it was overstuffed and showed up on someone's radar...perhaps even someone who wasn't in on the fix.

I am just guessing.

But if so, it indicates coordinated organization at national, state, and county levels. And I am not the only one who thinks this.

[lucky american]

You’ll get it tomorrow.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Email says Tues.
I am anxious to see it and share it.

[rlmorel]

It is worth every cent and more.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Joe Biden told us in Oct 2020 that Obama has assembled the most comprehensive voter fraud organization in history.

It’s ACORN after it splintered into a million pieces to make tracking what they were doing more difficult.

[Maris Crane]

Nothing makes people want to see something as:

TRYING TO KEEP IT UNDER COVER.

The Media are carrying on a COVER UP just as they claimed the Republicans did in Watergate.

Now, there will slowly more and more viewers and more disgust with the Media. Win-Win.

[thecodont]

[thecodont]

Time to clean things up!